GOP "prospects worst since watergate""

topic posted Wed, May 14, 2008 - 9:08 PM by  Cornel
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
"The political atmosphere facing House Republicans this November is the worst since Watergate and is far more toxic than it was in 2006."
VA Democrat Tom Davis

Question: will the Dems select their worst candidate since Jimmy Carter?

Carter got got 49 electoral votes (running as an incumbent!!) in 1980 - while Reagan got 489.
posted by:
Cornel
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: GOP "prospects worst since watergate""

    Wed, May 14, 2008 - 9:16 PM
    LOL...an OTHER anti obama post by you....this time in disguise .

    congratulations....you just joined seth on the Ignore list.
    • Re: GOP "prospects worst since watergate""

      Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:15 AM
      1976-

      Carter- 297
      Ford- 240

      Let's not maul history, Corny. Democrats should be happy for such "weakness."
      • Re: GOP "prospects worst since watergate""

        Thu, May 15, 2008 - 6:57 AM
        >> Rockstar: Let's not maul history, Corny. Democrats should be happy for such "weakness." <<

        The Democrats could have picked just about anyone and beaten Ford in 1976 - and that is precisely what they did. Carter's weakness was revealed when he ran for re-election - when Watergate had faded at least somewhat from people's memories.

        And this is precisely my point. When the Republicans are on the ropes, this is no time to put a lightweight like Obama in the White House.
  • Re: GOP "prospects worst since watergate""

    Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:24 AM
    Carter is a brilliant, awesome guy and was a great president - for example, it was he who created the EPA, and brokered the peace between Egypt and Israel.

    He got clobbered in 1980 because the public was pissed about rising inflation and the energy crisis (just like the Rethugs have to deal with today), because John Anderson drew away a chunk of the young progressive vote, and because Reagan came along and appealed to people's worst instincts in such a friendly, neighborly way.

    Carter did make the horrible mistake of supporting the Shah up until the end - he felt honor-bound to uphold those longtime diplomatic commitments from what I understand, even though the Shah was a brutal dictatorial shitbag. Carter should have said to hell with propping up John Foster Dulles's monstrous creations and condemned him when he began killing Iranian protesters. If he'd done so, the Iranaian hostage crisis would never have happened and we'd be living in a very very different world.

Recent topics in "! * POLITICS * !"