What will happen if we leave Iraq?

topic posted Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:18 AM by  badfish
I don't mean this as a way to push an agenda or as a chance to promote your candidate. So politics asides, what is everyones best guess as to what would happen if we leave Iraq?

Maybe things will work themselves out without our interference, but my guess is that violence and unrest would spread to neighboring countries leading to a more hostile and dangerous environment.

So what are some different guesses? Is pulling out of Iraq good or bad? Please keep this a civil discussion, I think it would be interesting to hear different opinions without the political chatter.
posted by:
badfish
Los Angeles
  • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

    Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:22 AM
    Americans will stop killing and dying and the motive force that started the war will cease. Since the war is in NO ONE'S interest but America's, expect peace to be imposed from within and above by the next Saddam to emerge from the rubble. THAT part won't take long.

    If he can get full price for Iraq's oil, the country could be rebuilt in a decade and US firms can profit big from it.
  • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

    Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:39 AM
    Nobody knows, period.

    Two things that seem almost 100% certain are that our troops there are regarded as an unwelcome occupation by the majority of Iraqis and are a constant instigation for terrorism, and that an immediate pullout would create a huge power vaccuum, chaos, and quite possibly far worse violence than we've seen yet.

    Given those two factors, it seems the best thing to do is proceed with a gradual pullout of troops that is combined with a real effort to repair Iraq's infrastructure - which most likely means employing Iraqis and not a bunch of war profiteers like Halliburton who'll just subcontract out to import the cheapest labor they can find.

    We need to make it absolutely clear that we will have no permanent bases in Iraq, and as we withdraw we will have to insure that any Americans who commit crimes against Iraqis (e.g. Blackwater) will be held accountable to Iraqi law. We also need to stop trying to interfere with Iraq's economy for the benefit of U.S. companies - e.g. our attempts to pressure the Iraqi parliament to completely privatize their oil reserves and open them up to U.S. corporations.

    Right now iraqis believe the U.S. started this war for oil, and though they are glad Saddam is gine they don't like us any better - they might have, but our policies and actions totally fucked that up right after the invasion. If we take the steps I mentioned and pull out gradually, I think the worst chaos and violence can be averted. Staying will be a constant provocation and source of instability, and our troops will continue to be killed as long as they are there, no matter what.
    • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

      Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:44 AM
      If we leave a nationalist Shiite government similar to the Iranian one would develop. President Muqtada would sign a bunch of oil deals with the Chinese and Russians, plus order a bunch of cool weapons. Iraq would integrate its economy heavily with Iran's and probably kick all US oil majors out of whatever contracts they've finagled under the occupation. Chinese and Russian military advisors would be on the ground, and US troops would be sent home entirely. President Muqtada would enjoy the cushy embassy left behind by America, complete with dairy queen and BK.

      In other words, the American empire's strategic worst nightmare, end of the game for the US in the middle east pretty much.

      So, once again, leaving is not an option for the empire. Iraq is a FAR more important piece than, say, Vietnam. The empire will fight MUCH harder to keep it.
    • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

      Thu, May 15, 2008 - 2:45 AM
      < Nobody knows, period.>

      Nonsense, Kelly. The entire region knows what will happen. I was talking to a Pakistani friend yesterday about this, and she said that everyone at least in her community knows that if we just up and leave, a civil war will break out that she's worried will turn into a regional war. No one in Pakistan who is at all Western-friendly or of the educated class wants us to leave.

      There's really no question about it. The Iranians will move in from the East to solidify their power in Iraq, the Turks will move in from the north in order to subdue the Kurds and the Saudis will arm and fund the Sunnis so that they won't be simply driven out of the country. The criminals will work to get their hands on the oil and the fundies will work to take control of the country for Allah.

      There's really no question about it. The only question is to what degree the mayhem will be. Just a short civil war until the winning party (Shia) subdues the rest of the sects? Or, a big ol' civil and then regional war? THAT is the only question.

      And, I notice that many people don't want to voice their opinions because they KNOW that in all probability things'll get bad, but don't want to admit it. That's dishonesty. Fairly ever do these people discuss their opinion of the effect of a thousand years of rivalry match with the latest era of sectarian slaughter. As if they'd all just get along. Yeah - when the Shia killed or drove out all of the Sunni....

      <Given those two factors, it seems the best thing to do is proceed with a gradual pullout of troops that is combined with a real effort to repair Iraq's infrastructure ->

      I agree. But, that "gradual pullout of troops" will have to be very gradual, as the Iranian troops are able to actually be Iranians first, and not Sunni or Shia or criminals......... That could take a while.

      <If we take the steps I mentioned and pull out gradually, I think the worst chaos and violence can be averted.>

      Generally I agree, except to say that your use of "can" probably is too hopeful. I have a hard time imagining that in the next ten years the groups there will be able to work together nicely without just resorting to their usual slaughtering of eachother.

      <Staying will be a constant provocation and source of instability, and our troops will continue to be killed as long as they are there, no matter what.>

      Tragic but true. I agree 100% Kelly that the government and society is far, far far far too weak to stand up on its own against the forces form outside AND inside that want to turn each sects/groups ideal Iraq a recipe for civil war. Anyone who thinks that they'll just get along and have a successful government if we up and leave is an idiot.

      <Doesn't matter what "will" (might) happen - all that is salient is the moral imperative for us to stop causing suffering, and the ethical imperative to leave that land, to forever quit attempting to own other lands,...>

      And you think that if we leave somehow the suffering will end? Really? You don't think that we're putting off a civil war? Really?
  • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

    Thu, May 15, 2008 - 12:49 AM
    The problem is not that the Iraqi army and security forces are weak. . .it is that the Iraqi civil society itself is weak.
    Al Maliki and his government are not a popular government and have little support. . .

    There are so many factions inside the army and security forces that creating a stable peace is going to be extremely difficult.

    Iraq has virtually none of the history, traditions or institutions that are needed to enable the emergence of a civil society. Trying to shove western style democracy down their throats is like trying to grow a plant without soil. If you look at the history of post Soviet Russia, you see a similar dynamic. . .Yeltsin was a weak leader and Russian civil society went into turmoil. The strong leadership of Putin was necessary to get crime and the economy under control.

    A great mistake was made when the US failed to have a plan for after the invasion. It would have been entirely possible to have left the Baathist party and army in place while eliminating the worst elements of the Hussein regime.

    If the US had done that and quickly pulled back from settled areas there might have been a chance for success. It would have required a transition to a strong central government that wouldn't allow for instability. The Iraqi government might have been headed by an army officer who had some following in the ranks, who could have been kept on a short leash.

    That could have been a transition period while a whole generation of young Iraqis were sent to school to receive a good general practical education, including an emphasis on democratic studies. It could be built into the system that these graduates who would now become teachers, civil servants, business managers, etc etc. would have a meaningful place in Iraqi society, through preferential hiring, business start-up loans, etc.

    There's a lot more that could have been done, but instead the US atomized the Iraqi infrastructure. . .not just the electric and water supply grids, etc. . but the civil infrastructure. There is nothing that can be done at this point to restore that civil infrastructure.

    It might be that France or Sweden could do it. . .but we can't. We have blown all the tremendous political capital that we accrued after liberation ( and lost it quite rapidly ).

    The best case would be to ask our democratic allies to join in a summit to develop a plan for developing the civil infrastructure, while implementing a structured departure from first combat operations, and second urban deployment. What the US and its democratic allies would be working on should be clearly communicated to the Iraqi public.

    But leaving the troops there as they are now is foolhardy. There should be a phased withdrawal, first from combat operations, then from urban deployment and finally with a ready reaction presence at perhaps two or three strategically located bases that are not located near to densely populated areas. . .one in the kurdish region near the turkish border, and one near the kuwaiti border.
    • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

      Thu, May 15, 2008 - 1:31 AM
      >The problem is not that the Iraqi army and security forces are weak. . .it is that the Iraqi civil society itself is weak.

      Horseshit. Why do you take the same point of view as neocons?
      • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

        Thu, May 15, 2008 - 1:34 AM
        >We ain't leaving till the last drop of oil is gone so its a moot topic.

        Horseshit. Why do you take the same point of view as neocons?
        • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

          Thu, May 15, 2008 - 1:56 AM
          Dude you disputing we're there for oil and bases?!?!?

          You are spouting the same old imperialist bullshit. Pick up a book, read up on imperialism of days past about savages not being able to run their own affairs. You will realize you are repeating bullshit almost LINE FOR LINE.
  • Re: What will happen if we leave Iraq?

    Thu, May 15, 2008 - 2:23 AM
    Doesn't matter what "will" (might) happen - all that is salient is the moral imperative for us to stop causing suffering, and the ethical imperative to leave that land, to forever quit attempting to own other lands, to improve ourselves individually and nurture one another societally and communally, to extend only peaceful aid, internally and externally.

    Anything else is crime and atrocity.

Recent topics in "! * POLITICS * !"