mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

topic posted Fri, January 12, 2007 - 8:31 AM by  Gerbil
Share/Save/Bookmark
torrentfreak.com/mpaa-caug...-torrents/
---
MPAA Caught Uploading Fake Torrents

It is no secret that the MPAA and other anti-piracy organizations track down alleged pirates by uploading fake torrents. Up until now it was always unclear where those files came from, and how to identify them.

The MPAA and other anti-piracy watchdogs try to trap people into downloading fake torrents, so they can collect IP addresses, and send copyright infringement letters to ISPs. They hire a company to put up fake copies of popular movies, music albums, and TV series. They even use pirate like filenames such as “Battlestar Galactica S03E07 REPACK DSR XviD-ORENJi” and “Miami Vice[2006]DvDrip[Eng]-aXXo“.

One of the btjunkie admins has found a unique way to identify trackers that host these fake files, which makes it easy to efficiently remove them.

Virtually all the servers that spread these fake files are located in Southern California and Las Vegas. The administrators of these servers follow patterns that make it easy to identify them. The content of the trackers and seed amounts make them stand out. There are more unique characteristics, but we wont reveal all the tricks because they could take counter measures. Here are some examples of servers that host and track fake torrents:

Tracker 1, Tracker 2, Tracker 3 & Tracker 4. (Screenshots: One & Two)

All the information was provided to me by one of the admins of btjunkie, who works together on this with other torrent site admins. He says that the MPAA and friends use a variety of tactics. The tracker will either stall everyone at around 90% or the content will just be a blank monochrome screen.

“I really think this is being done by professionals with a budget, that’s a lot of servers to setup and it takes some expertise to setup in the manner that they did it,” says the btjunkie admin. “I don’t think I really need to say who would spend money on something like this.”

Here are some good examples of how these fake torrents clutter up the search results. Virtually all of those X marked torrents are coming from the ip-ranges we mentioned, and are fake files. The good thing is that Torrentportal’s report system is well used by their users.

The server boxes that host these torrents fall in serveral ip-ranges, and are not yet blocked by blocklist software like peerguardian. Here are a few of the ranges that were discovered recently. You can easily add these to the blocklist of your torrent client (if it supports one), filewall, or blocklist manager.
66.172.60.XXX, 66.177.58.XXX, 66.180.205.XXX, 209.204.61.XXX, 216.151.155.XXX

The anti-piracy servers use hostnames like 101tracker.dhcp.biz, aplustorrents.qhigh.com, bitnova.squirly.info, bittorment.ocry.com, and pirate-trakkrz.leet.la. All these hostnames can be traced back to the same IP Ranges, these ranges contain possibly hundreds of fake trackers, so feel free to block them:

A list of infohashes of fake torrents can be found over here.

Note that it’s not only MPAA material that is hosted on these fake trackers. It is more likely that the servers are owned and operated by an organization that logs IP addresses for several copyright owners and or anti-piracy organizations.

Update: according to one of out readers these ip-ranges belong to “Media Defender“, a company that is hired by copyright owners, to log IP-addresses. This reader, who worked for Media Defender until recently, confirmed that some of the torrents that were mentioned, are indeed on the MPAA’s list.
posted by:
Gerbil
Chicago
  • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

    Fri, January 12, 2007 - 10:11 AM
    Is there a bad guy or a good guy in there?
    • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

      Fri, January 12, 2007 - 10:15 AM
      does there need to be one of either?
      • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

        Fri, January 12, 2007 - 10:42 AM
        Maybe.
        Ya got people who have created and produced a thing who reasonably expect to be compensated when it changes hands.
        Ya got people who think it's OK those dudes are making too much money anyway ( or something like that)
        Ya got the law that says you can't just help yourself to other psople's stuff.
        and now
        ya got people trying to find the IDs of the people who are trying to help themselves for free.

        Someone in there has to be wrong.

        • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

          Fri, January 12, 2007 - 10:47 AM
          i agree with kage. the fight against piracy won't be won with strength.

          the dynamic of audio/video/etc being released has changed and there's no way to return it back to the way it was. instead of fighting each other, they should work together.
          • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

            Fri, January 12, 2007 - 10:51 AM
            >>>>>>the dynamic of audio/video/etc being released has changed and there's no way to return it back to the way it was. instead of fighting each other, they should work together.<<<<



            there you go. Excellent answer.

            And thanks for posting this thread.
        • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

          Fri, January 12, 2007 - 10:56 AM
          Its the middleman that's the problem.

          The companies stiff the artists AND the consumers by a massive amount.

          The net is allowing people to bypass the middleman completely, its just bad that the artist gets hurt too.

          This is why a lot of up and coming media producers cut out the middle man and go straight to the public at a fraction of the cost.
          • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

            Fri, January 12, 2007 - 12:33 PM
            ***********he net is allowing people to bypass the middleman completely, its just bad that the artist gets hurt too. ***********
            It is "just bad" ?? ?? ?
            I submit that it is the great and terrible evil here that the artist is getting the shit end of the stick. It is not something that ought to be reduced to "just."

            Whats sadder is the Artists are not behind the anti piracy efforts it's the big money industry corporations that are all over it.

            And it's "just bad" that the artist has to take a fucking.?


            • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

              Fri, January 12, 2007 - 12:37 PM
              <Whats sadder is the Artists are not behind the anti piracy efforts>

              the artists are smart enough to not get involved because it will only make the consumer of their work hostile towards them.

              what's better? a happy consumer? or a hostile consumer?
            • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

              Fri, January 12, 2007 - 12:40 PM
              Sorry Cliff,

              Artists sometimes get fucked over out of ignorance.

              Rage against the machine had the right idea when using things like Napster before they got bought and made corp.

              Post your art up as a sample and see what your fans think.

              If they like what they hear THEY WILL buy the cd.

              This is a noted fact.

              Here is another example, wordperfect would not have become as big as they were if they did not give out the first copies of wordperfect for free.


              Getting back to the record companies and film industries, they dropped the ball. They could have been way ahead of apple with the itunes if they weren't so greedy and made the investment with software engineers to protect their products.

              Apple did it. and it wasn't hard to do.
            • Re: mpaa caught uploading fake torrents

              Fri, January 12, 2007 - 1:23 PM
              STRIKE ONE -- recording artists get 10% of profits on average, while the record stores get 50%.

              STRIKE TWO -- record companies, who make up the figureheads at the RIAA, decide what you listen to on tv and on the radio because they have the marketing power that has accumulated over the years, which is why today's popular music is plastic and sterile and you have to really dig to hear something original. what was once a somewhat inventive rennaisance of paying attention to what people like, is now a corrupt game of manipulating record sales. so now you have cases like with prince, who gives away "free" copies of his album at his concerts, but the cost is actually included in the ticket price so that every copy given out is a record sale. how many do you think of these kids paying $80 to ticketmaster (another rackett) to see the prince concert have already bought his new album?

              STRIKE THREE -- if the mp3 hadn't come along, we'd still be spending $15-18 per crappy album (see above) and climbing. thanks to the mp3 format, we can not only buy a song at $0.99 per track, but there is competition among providers to maximize these sales so they have deals for free mp3's and limited subscriptions.


              the record industry has had this kind of thing coming for a loooong time. an argument on the side of the artist and THEREFORE the record company ("there is no show without the business") is an argument for gypping customers into buying crappy music, since the record companies have made it so that both the artist AND the consumer have increasingly little influence.

Recent topics in "! * POLITICS * !"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Communists at heart? Erik 8 Today, 9:18 PM
Palin Guessgame is Over: 9 Today, 9:14 PM
Independence is not enough. . Lorenzo 5 Today, 9:08 PM
tribe morons preoccupied with bullshit TL 30 Today, 8:52 PM