Advertisement
I know that goodbye threads annoy some but I think they can be to some degree useful - like when subscribers to a magazine unsubscribe and the magazine wants to know why.
There have been different types of moderators in the Politics tribe. There have been those who have tried hard to be even handed with varying success and those with hands off attitudes. But at least with both types there were serious efforts to be even handed. Nolen can't seem to remove himself from his personal biases whatever they are and decided to treat this tribe like his personal living room and keep or reject whomever he feels like with no concern for anything resembling evenhandedness. He has publicly misrepresented my concerns privately expressed to him, sneered down at bringing TOU violations to his attention even though he invited people to do so, has publicly misrepresented things I've said, claimed that I was goading flamers by citing posts in which I was responding to egregious flaming myself, and again blamed me for goading flaming by citing posts where I was talking about someone else entirely - it was only Nolen's completely unsubstantiated assumptions about who I was talking about, and his assumptions didn't even make any sense. And I know that I'm not the only person who has notice Nolen's pattern of blaming those the trolls have flamed as much as the trolls themselves. Inna, for one, has as well and she's left the tribe for good.
I've liked the Politics tribe, even with the occasional flaming, but I have no interest in a discussion group that is run by a tinpot dictator who enforces the rules capriciously and arbitrarily and bends over backwards to defend people whe feels politically akin to and blame those he doesn't. In a sense one can't blame Nolen too much, since he's simply acting as partisan and biased as he always has. I guess I can blame Lorenzo. He really couldn't have picked a worse moderator.
I'll stick around a bit to make sure I'm not misrepresented in this thread. Otherwise take care everyone.
There have been different types of moderators in the Politics tribe. There have been those who have tried hard to be even handed with varying success and those with hands off attitudes. But at least with both types there were serious efforts to be even handed. Nolen can't seem to remove himself from his personal biases whatever they are and decided to treat this tribe like his personal living room and keep or reject whomever he feels like with no concern for anything resembling evenhandedness. He has publicly misrepresented my concerns privately expressed to him, sneered down at bringing TOU violations to his attention even though he invited people to do so, has publicly misrepresented things I've said, claimed that I was goading flamers by citing posts in which I was responding to egregious flaming myself, and again blamed me for goading flaming by citing posts where I was talking about someone else entirely - it was only Nolen's completely unsubstantiated assumptions about who I was talking about, and his assumptions didn't even make any sense. And I know that I'm not the only person who has notice Nolen's pattern of blaming those the trolls have flamed as much as the trolls themselves. Inna, for one, has as well and she's left the tribe for good.
I've liked the Politics tribe, even with the occasional flaming, but I have no interest in a discussion group that is run by a tinpot dictator who enforces the rules capriciously and arbitrarily and bends over backwards to defend people whe feels politically akin to and blame those he doesn't. In a sense one can't blame Nolen too much, since he's simply acting as partisan and biased as he always has. I guess I can blame Lorenzo. He really couldn't have picked a worse moderator.
I'll stick around a bit to make sure I'm not misrepresented in this thread. Otherwise take care everyone.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
so sorry
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:37 AMyou do realize the similarity to a child going 'i'm going to run away from home and THEN you're going to be sorry (realize how WRONG you were), right?
-
-
Re: so sorry
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:29 AM"you do realize the similarity to a child going 'i'm going to run away from home and THEN you're going to be sorry (realize how WRONG you were), right? "
Just explaining why I'm leaving zoner. If that's useless information to you, then feel free to ignore it.
But happy to give you another opportunity to flame though.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:54 AMAw, my mum used to say that to me when I'd be bummed about something that upset me. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:56 AM
*Aw, my mum used to say that to me when I'd be bummed about something that upset me.*
yeah, mine too, only we would add, "somewhere a toilet is flushing" -
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 7:10 AMSpeaking of both toilets and passing, I just read this funny story that was posted by Stickboy in Allnighters, lady accidentally swallowed her engagement ring, excerpt:
‘This too shall pass’
The next day — Wednesday — Whipple posted the whole story along with pictures and video on her blog, Krazy Kaitlin. One of the pictures shows her posing with the X-ray along with a bag of prunes and a box of high-fiber breakfast cereal. Her friends, she said, assured her that “this too shall pass.”
On Thursday, she had happy news to report on her blog: “It arrived this morning and I have never been so excited about my bodily functions. Haha. It’s so beautiful and I love it. It was definitely well worth the wait.”
The news article (more to read):
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29462344/
Stickboy's original post:
tribes.tribe.net/allnighte...91296b7f96 -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 9:35 AMi'm taking my marbles and going home! -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 10:38 AMHow in the world can a woman swallow her wedding ring
especially if it had a diamond in it?
She's lucky it didnt slice up her esophagus on the way down or cut up "anything else" in there!
what WAS she doing with her wedding ring in her MOUTH anyway? -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:02 PMits probable don't want to know the answer to that.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:53 AMNow, don't be rushing into anything! Look, this kind of thing happens in just about every tribe with every moderator change. SOMEONE will not like the choice. SOMEONE will not get along with the moderator or something the moderator does or wants to do.
And it's not easy for the moderator either. I bet his PMs have been frequently incoming, from people complaining. I've put in my 2 cents of complaints. LOL!
When there is a change, people will go with or against it. Just like in Politics! Just like with presidents!!! The new president is sucky because he's not like the last guy. Because he's not this political party. He's not this religion. Blah blah blah.
Say, you aren't moving to Canada, are you? ;) -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 4:15 AMOMG how are we going to survive the loss of our resident closet bushco supporter
whats the world coming to ...............
this must really be.............
armageddon time
traveling music que -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 5:31 AMPersonally, I think that you should reconsider and stick around. This is a community, and your thoughtful postings here are very valuable as an addition to the usual claptrap of discourse here.
I do understand your yearning to protect your own integrity by this attempt at taking the high-road, but this is not the real world, it's a weird little island in the great ocean of the internet that needs upright citizens such as yourself.
If Nolen is not being fair, then fine. That's his choice. But, I would hope that the positive results of your being here are outweighed by the harm that you feel that he has done to this group and you personally.
This is a valuable community in our lives for whatever the hell reason that we find this valuable, and I think that in some ways, these communications enrich our lives more than they waste our time.
Well - I hope so at least.
Take a break maybe, but I hope that you choose to come back and 'win' by being more righteous, not by leaving.
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 5:46 AMEveryone's opinion and thoughts and ideas and comments have value.
Unless it's just baiting or swearing or flat out attacks, we can learn a lot from each other.
For instance, in our daily lives, we might not have the opportunity for such lively exchanges with people who hold vastly different views.
At work, it could make for a very bad work situation. Like people getting fired for telling the person in the next cubicle to "f-off". Just can't do that at work. And we probably shouldn't be doing that to each other here either.
At home, unless someone wants to sleep on the sofa or there is much door slamming, there probably aren't huge discussions taking place about politics.
People do take sides. Of their friends or family or nationality or political party. They want things to be smooth. Except life isn't smooth. Unless we all choose to try to see it from another person's point of view.
And to perhaps consider issues by what the subject matter is, and not by who posted it. It would really help if people would not create names that are meant to be insulting. Whether it's for each other, or for various politicians.
Yes, I know it's very hard not to respond when someone is on our case about something. There was a time I'd respond every time, ending up in some dadgum battle. I'm getting much better at not responding when I know that a person is choosing to go after me.
It's easier to change my reaction than it is to change that other person. LOL!
And it's much easier to point out a problem if I don't respond in kind. Because then it just looks like yet another flame war that will be near impossible to figure out who started what without reading everything ever posted on Tribe.net. I can't even read everything posted in this tribe. And I'm sure the moderator and most members aren't reading every single post here.
Yes, when I thought something was very unfair in this tribe previously, I left too. Took a breather. I do that with many tribes. I can end up feeling drained if I put too much energy or focus into one area. It takes on importance that it doesn't really have.
Ron, are you in the Do It Yourself tribe? There's always something new to learn there. Some interesting photos in the photo gallery.
do-it-yourself.tribe.net/
Another neat tribe is Patti's Recipe tribe. People post all kinds of things there, and links too.
recipeexchange.tribe.net/
This is fun, the Non Traditional Housing tribe:
nontraditionalhousing.tribe.net/
Astronomy is great, mostly it's Serge posting really good articles to read:
astro.tribe.net/
Clear your mind of what is going on here by reading and enjoying some other good tribes. If all else fails, go to Safeway, get their Peppermint Herbal Tea, make a mug of tea, and then take two tea bags and toss them into the bathtub and soak in minty bliss while sipping yummy peppermint. Add in some plain Epsom Salts too. To the bath water, not the mug of tea. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 6:49 AM"Running away from issues" is the poorest way to handle one's life problems.
*nuff said* -
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:10 AM>>>>>>>"Running away from issues" is the poorest way to handle one's life problems. <<<<<<
Perhaps you overestimate the importance of tribe to Ron. It's one thing to work hard for a degree, or a marriage, or to launch a business or learn to play the piano, but joining a tribe entails no such commitment. If politics has become more trouble than it's worth to him, why *not* leave?
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:26 AM""Running away from issues" is the poorest way to handle one's life problems. "
It's not issues that I've had enough of Jennitalia -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:38 AMI understand and support Ron's decision even if I don't entirely agree with it.
Please don't try to suck him back in like we're some kind of cult.
He can participate or not participate as ha chooses, and I think he's doing a good thing by explaining why he'll not be participating. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:57 AMthe perspectives of a diverse set of people is important here,,,
some of the words people have put here gave me more food for thought
and i appreciate it,,,,I left the mideast tribe because of four people who took over,,,and now there is
little diversity,,,and the ones who are active beyond those four would be interesting to actually
have a dialogue with the others except no one bothered with offering solutions,,,
Here at least there is discourse,,,and some teasing and some dumb ass calling,
tho thats part of being here and its often diverse,,,even cliff has some great recipes every
once in a while,,, -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 11:19 AM>the perspectives of a diverse set of people is important here,,,
Exactly.
How can I attack people's arguments if anyone I disagree with takes my disagreement as a sign that they are not welcome?
Some people disappear because they see an attack on their ideas as an attack on their identity, and that's lame.
But, if I understand correctly, Ron is leaving because attacks on his identity have been used in place of attacks on his ideas. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:09 PM"But, if I understand correctly, Ron is leaving because attacks on his identity have been used in place of attacks on his ideas. "
Not just that. Anyone who posts a lot around here is inevitably going to be personally attacked. Most of the time one can deal with it by trying to avoid getting pulled into a flame war and just continuing to post relevant posts and maybe talk to the person calmly. But if there are persistent, rude trolls (e.g. Loki) who are obsessed with flaming you, the only alternative to just accepting the interminable stench of their incessant flaming is to bring it to the attention of the moderator. Unfortunately, Nolen has brought his own personal biases of who he sympathizes with and doesn't sympathize with into the equation, and bent over backwards to rationalize the noxious behavior of certain trolls and equally blame those the trolls have gratuitously flamed as much as the trolls themselves. Such absurd bias in moderation is not tolerable to me.
By the way, aside from myself and Inna, Cliff is also gone (though I'm sure that pleases some). He told me that he's leaving because Nolen was flexing his power and giving him a hard time (including threatening him with expulsion) for being too hard on Obama (e.g. complaining about Cliff's repeated attack threads on Obama and an anti Obama picture Cliff posted), which is the first time I've heard of anyone being driven out by the moderator of a politics tribe for being too critical of a president. That's Cliff's position at least. I'm not directly privy to the exchanges between Cliff and Nolen, but given that Nolen once accused me of trolling for having the audacity to suggest that an Obama speech was boring, I wouldn't be surprised at him being heavy handed in reacting to "too much" criticism of Obama. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:01 PMJust shooting in that Nolen has been pretty straightforward about using PMs to yell at me and demand that I stop doing what you, Inna, Cliff, &c. do every day.
Should I have made a thread whining about it? Would that have helped you see that you *aren't* really all that special in the scheme of things?
"wah Loki flames me". Ha~! Only a self-obsessed nutter would actually take the handful of quick notes I lay on your altar each day as an 'obsession' but I suppose these things are magnified when they're... all you have....
;( poor Ron
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:04 PM<<He told me that he's leaving because Nolen was flexing his power and giving him a hard time (including threatening him with expulsion) for being too hard on Obama (e.g. complaining about Cliff's repeated attack threads on Obama and an anti Obama picture Cliff posted)>>
Translation, I told Cliff to stop flooding the board and told him that pictures which imply that children are performing fellatio on adults are unacceptable. For the record, I did threaten him with expulsion for the later.
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 8:39 PMBeing Flamed by Loki is some what of a tribe honor, or should I say hazing? Anyway all the cool kids get it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 9:02 PMNo it's not. I got it and I'm not a cool kid.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 9:58 PMInna appears to have left tribe:
smartpolitics.tribe.net/thread...45f82d7
It currently shows her as being unsubscribed. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 12:57 AMNot surprising. Her trend towards becoming more and more radical meant that even here in Lefty-heaven Tribe, it was too far to the right for her.
Plus...to be honest, when's the last time that she contributed anything but telling someone to "Fuck Off"? She used to be pretty much the most level head and was very widely respected by all sides, but...I am not sure what happened to her, so I am not surprised that she became too radical to stay here. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 1:37 AMI am more radical than Inna, but I think I do a better job of getting along in general.
I dont want to say anything else bad about her though now that she is gone. Id like to do my part to let it die than keep it going. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:15 PMi'm more radical than all of you! i eat my breakfast on a copy of das kapital! -
-
Re: Later everyone
Thu, April 2, 2009 - 12:28 AMInna just seems very very leftist. When I think of radical, I usually think of Anarchists and Socialists and radical environmentalists like Derrik Jensen. Sometimes I might include hardcore Libertarians in this category. Inna doesnt seem like she is out there with the ELF or planning for the next anti-globalization summit. She is more of a green/liberal democrat. She is actually just left of center by tribe.net standards.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:00 PMOh; that's so ridiculous. You're one of the baitingest posters on the board.
If you don't like getting flamed, then stop flaming people. Pretty simple. I offered you that arrangement explicitly - and you ignored it.
So, head for the hills, puffy, if suddenly you're all tender, but don't think you'll be missed all *that* much. You're one of the few people on this forum I'd say is actually more regularly insulting than I am - neither of us make it on to the "Cliff" scale of measurements, but you're certainly an avid practitioner of many shades of insult, goading, flaming, bitching, sniping, and &c..
Taking this pose is quite a step down from your lofty perch, old bean - sure you want to leave right after the thread that states "booooo hoooooo you don't worship me enough"?
How very droll and yet curiously apt: the mod that doesn't wipe your little ass for you is just not acceptable. Your sort only really cares for fora in which you get special treatment.
Well, that being the case, I'm sure there are a number of RW blogs and like anti-progress fora for you to go be superior in. Enjoy~! The net is your oyster. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:03 PM
Ron is the one of the only sane right-wing people here. He will be missed.
-troy -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 12:58 PMMaybe you and he can get a new tribe going that offers the chance for Ron to pontificate in a forum that will not decry his regular reliance on ad hominem arguments, straw man arguments, deceitful appeals to his own authority, and so forth!
I'll join~! :) I'll even pretend he's not a smug, unpleasant, pompous windbag having very little contact with the outside-world, just to help roll things along. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:00 PMand I'd like to thank Loki for once again providing concrete examples of the problems I've been talking about.
By the way, in a recent development, Yooni has informed me that she's leaving as well because of Nolen's troll tolerance. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:40 PM<<By the way, in a recent development, Yooni has informed me that she's leaving as well because of Nolen's troll tolerance.>>
So what, exactly, is the cause of action against Nolen? Is it his iron-fisted control of debate? Or is it his anything-goes attitude towards trolls? -
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:51 PMBoth~!!!
And if you ask anymore questions we will be having curried parrot for diner
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:56 PMThere's no cause. Asking people to behave with more maturity and self-control is not really a "cause of action" kind of event. Yes, telling Cliff to stop what Nolen considered "flooding" (if that was actually true) is not really appropriate since all the threads were politics-related and people were free to ignore those posts. That said, I'd rather have someone err on the side of foementing reasonable discourse than allow the group to devolve into an insult-fest.
So, Inna's gone? Well, big deal. When's the last time that she contributed more than just saying "Fuck Off" or "Fuck You" to people? She used to be the most-admired person around, so I'm not sure what happened to her, to tell you the truth.
Cliff was a good addition, and it's too bad that he's gone, to tell you the truth.
Ron - same as Cliff, except he made sense.
Anyway. Setting a baseline standard of expectation on trollish behavior is a good move in my opinion. The flooding threat? Well, that's going to far for sure, but all the other calls seem reasonable with the possible exception of his issue with Ron, which makes no sense to me. But...I doubt anyone's reading this anyway so I'm not sure how important that opinion is anyway.
I'm going to go talk to myself in the corner. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 2:04 PMI don't think Cliff is gone. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 11:00 PMhe's like a bad penny.
take two quaaludes, he'll love us in the morning.
-
-
-
-
Re: how *much* Later? soon? when?
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 1:59 PMYou're always welcome, buddy~! =)
See? People can learn to get along, and even help one another. -
-
Re: how *much* Later? soon? when?
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 2:46 PMYes, goodbye threads annoy people.
Enough said already. Goodbye already.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 3:35 PMSo, will we then see you in one of the Politics reject tribes? Chatting it up with Sal?
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 4:45 PMI'm very sorry to hear this.
I was beginning to enjoy arguing with you, which is certainly one of the great bonuses of this type of forum.
Only you know when you've had enough. It's easy for me to walk away from these kind of things and my job gives me a rhino's hide, but I can't be the one to tell you your limit on pure stone dumbness.
<< one can't blame Nolen too much, since he's simply acting as partisan and biased as he always has.I guess I can blame Lorenzo. He really couldn't have picked a worse moderator. >>
I had the exact opposite experience with Nolen, including him bending over backward to accommodate a member with views 1) diametrically opposed to his own and 2) objectively batshit.
In any event, I'm sad to see you go. You are only one of two Tribe antagonists (the other was Satan of Tribe) who ever clicked to the fact that I really *don't* take this insult bullshit personally and that puts you both head and shoulders above the rest intellectually. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 7:06 PMI've enjoyed your postings Ron. You have always handled yourself well, even when I've disagreed with you. There's plenty of disruptive dicks on this board, and you were not one of them.
Cliff was capable of totally wigging out, and I won't miss him much. Nor Inna, but to me, Ron M is a loss of a different perspective on a board mostly filled with in-fighting lefties.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Later everyone
Tue, March 31, 2009 - 9:01 PMSooo, you're not going to leave, right? You're going to stick around! Yay! Good. -
-
Re: Later everyone
Wed, April 1, 2009 - 9:15 PMcan someone decide if nolen tolerates trolls too much or not enough? the indecision is killing me!
-
-
Re: Later everyone
Thu, April 2, 2009 - 1:13 AMif nolen is taking out the ron trash, i say about fukin time.
-
-
Re: Later everyone
Thu, April 2, 2009 - 1:17 AMif nolen is taking out the cliff trash, then my esteem of nolen just doubled.
-