<<Personally I don't see a difference between beauty pagents and pornography, both expoit womens sexuality and objectify them. It's an irony that one should object to the other.>>

I agree that beauty pageants and pornography are pretty much one in the same. Beauty pageants are considered to have a bit more of a 'wholesome' image at least in western society.

However I don't think that the beauty pageant objected to the pornographic film the contestant made, they just threatened to use it against the woman if she sued them on the grounds of religious discrimination. The implied message was that this woman could hardly argue convincingly in court that she was a woman of strict Christian moral principles if she willingly participated in pornographic films.

Unless like Mary Magdalene, she was previously a woman of loose moral standards that had a change of heart and was born again?

Still, she did not say "Oh, that was before I became a Christian!"
Instead, her reaction was "That's not me! Whoops! Okay I admit it is me, never mind then!"

I wonder how many Christians actually refrain from masturbating merely because of that book.