Philadelphia: City of Brotherly Thugs
[col. writ. 5/8/08] (c) '08 Mumia Abu-Jamal


The scene is as common as sunlight: cops beating Black men in the streets.

This time, captured on videotape from a hovering helicopter, a malevolent swarm of cops pull occupants from a car, and then proceed to beat the paste out of the men, kicking, punching, and slamming with a club. At least 15 cops are seen in the broadcast beatdown; an average of 5 to 1.

Within moments of its broadcast came the predictable defense: cops in Philly are "stressed."

One need not even await such defenses anymore: just put a tape on speed dial, and repeat.

If ever there was irony, the three car occupants were charged with aggravated assault, and criminal conspiracy.

How much do you wanna bet that the cops, who were caught on film in the midst of aggravated assault, and as they committed the crime in common, criminal conspiracy, are never charged with these crimes -- and probably will never be arrested?

How can I dare make such a claim?

Well, I have plenty of practice.

Most folks flash back to the infamous Rodney King case, where cops in L.A. went into a whipping fit, because King tried to outrun them.

Were they too, stressed?

It also reminded me of the taped beating of Delbert Africa, a MOVE member who was beaten during the August 8th, 1978 police raid on MOVE's home.

These cops, too, were easily acquitted by explicit judicial decree.

If tape doesn't matter, what does?

In the case against three cops who rifle-butted, punched and kicked Delbert, the judge ignored the video tapes, and cited both Delbert's muscularity, and the claim of a Black TV reporter, who claimed she saw him armed --this, despite the tape showing him shirtless, empty hands opened, and naked from the waist up!

Prepare for the all but inevitable whitewash.

Look at that tape again, and you will see something that you'll see if you looked at a gang attack, for these are gangsters, pure and simple.

Only it's the Blue gang.

Welcome to Philadelphia: the city of brotherly thugs.

--(c) '08 maj


Mumia Abu-Jamal is a political prisoner in the United States, for more on his case read:

Top Ten “Fry Mumia” Myths Debunked
(Myth #1) “Five eyewitnesses saw Mumia shoot officer Faulkner.”
indybay.org/newsitems/20.../18436405.php

Also See:
Closing Our Eyes Won’t Make Racial and Ethnic Inequalities Disappear
by STEVEN ARGUE
www.indybay.org/newsitems/...8473855.php

Distributed by Liberation News, Subscribe free:
lists.riseup.net/www/info/...ation_news

Join the Cool Earth Party
tribes.tribe.net/coolearth
posted by:
Steven
SF Bay Area
  • Steven,

    You should create some more threads about Mumia. There aren't enough of them already.
    • I think this is not a post about Mumia but a post about Philadelphia..
      If people took the time to read a little further they would find out Mumia has interesting stories to tell..
      Sadly most people don't get above the level of soundbites


      "It also reminded me of the taped beating of Delbert Africa, a MOVE member who was beaten during the August 8th, 1978 police raid on MOVE's home.

      These cops, too, were easily acquitted by explicit judicial decree.

      If tape doesn't matter, what does?

      In the case against three cops who rifle-butted, punched and kicked Delbert, the judge ignored the video tapes, and cited both Delbert's muscularity, and the claim of a Black TV reporter, who claimed she saw him armed --this, despite the tape showing him shirtless, empty hands opened, and naked from the waist up!

      ............

      Look at that tape again, and you will see something that you'll see if you looked at a gang attack, for these are gangsters, pure and simple.

      Only it's the Blue gang. "
  • don't interrupt SHeik.


    Steven hasn't made his Moomia quota for the month....
    • It's "Mumia" Brent, not "Moomia".
      • we totally need more Moomia, er, Wesley Cook threads

        • Why do you insist on calling Mumia by his slave name Brent?
          • that's his name. Wesley Cook...

            He's never been a slave

            • No, his name is Mumia Abu-Jamal.

              You keep calling him by the slave name that he has rejected. That's a rude racist thing to do.

              Brent asks, "what's your slave name?"

              Unlike Mumia, my recent ancestors were not held in chattel slavery, so my name was not given to me by any slave owners.
              • He got his name from his parents, William and Edith Cook. Last I heard, they weren't slaves either

                • Brent, are you really this stupid?

                  Do I have to explain every little obvious detail to you?
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    ***pumps fist*****


                    Freeeeeee MOOOOOOMIAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!


                    that "pig" Faulker "had it coming"

                    • Faulkner was killed by Kenneth Freeman.
                      • Steven,

                        Of course he was...it was in the dining room with Colonel Mustard right?

                        • No Sheik, it was at the corner of 13th and Locust in Philadelphia.

                          Why are you being a troll?
                          • yeah, Moomia's gun was out of its holster; the bullets matched the gun that Moomia was holding.....the gun was also registered to Mumia


                            Several eyewitnesses all point to mumia as the killer. At the trial, Officer Faulkner's blood stained shirt was shown, mumia turned and smiled at Faulkner's widow.


                            the so-called confession of Arnold Beverly was so patently ridiculous, Mumia's own lawyers wouldn't touch it.
                            • Brent claims: “Several eyewitnesses all point to mumia as the killer. At the trial, Officer Faulkner's blood stained shirt was shown, mumia turned and smiled at Faulkner's widow.”

                              This is not true. The prosecution depends on two key witnesses, Robert Chobert and Cynthia White, the only witnesses who claimed they saw Mumia shoot Faulkner.

                              In 1995, Chobert admitted that he never saw the shooting. (G.M. Newman 9/25/01 Affidavit) Chobert was not parked behind Faulkner’s police car, a fact confirmed by freelance photographer Pedro Polakoff’s recently unearthed crime scene photos, which the prosecution had suppressed for nearly 25 years. Taken only minutes after the shooting, the photos show no car parked behind Faulkner’s vehicle.

                              Cynthia White was not even there during the shooting. Prosecution witnesses Chobert, Scanlan and Magilton, as well as defense witness Veronica Jones, who knew White, all testified at trial that White was not on the corner where she claimed to see the shooting. (Chobert: N.T.6/19/82:227-28; Scanlan: N.T.6/25/82:58; Magilton: N.T.6/25/82:86; Jones: N.T.6/29/82:129-30) William Singletary testified that White came up to him after the shooting to ask him what happened. (8/31/90 Deposition 25). In addition, Cynthia White admitted to Yvette Williams that she was lying out of fear from the police and her pimp. (1/28/02 Declaration: Yvette Williams)

                              Brent claims: “yeah, Moomia's gun was out of its holster; the bullets matched the gun that Moomia was holding.....the gun was also registered to Mumia”

                              Mumia had a gun registered to him that he used to defend himself as a night cab driver.

                              There is no credible evidence that Mumia's gun was found next to him, and there was no evidence that Mumia's gun had been fired. No tests were done to see if Mumia’s gun had been fired. Those tests were never done because the police knew it had not been fired.

                              Despite claims by the police that they found the gun immediately, radio recordings proved they were still looking for it 14 minutes after they arrived. Some of the cops thought that the gun had left with the shooter on foot. Fourteen minutes was plenty of time to get the gun from Mumia’s cab, especially with Inspector Giordono on the scene, a corrupt cop that was in charge of repressive operations against MOVE and the Black Panther Party.

                              The officer who found the gun also lied about how he handled the gun. Different cops had completely contradictory stories about how and when the gun was found. The Plakinoff photos, illegally suppressed by the prosecution for 25 years, show the gun being held in such a way that would have destroyed any fingerprints, this despite police lies to the contrary. Instead of putting the gun into evidence with the mobile crime unit, as is standard procedure, the police drove around with it for two hours before they delivered it to the station.

                              Brent claims: “the so-called confession of Arnold Beverly was so patently ridiculous, Mumia's own lawyers wouldn't touch it.”

                              Brent knows this is not true. Judge Dembe threw Arnold Beverly’s confession out, making the ridiculous assertion that it was not filed in a timely way. Mumia’s attorney’s did, however, try to file Arnold Beverly’s confession to a capital murder.

                              While Beverly’s confession does fit some evidence and the eyewitness accounts of one or two men fitting his discription running from the scene, the evidence that Kenneth Freeman shot Faulkner is overwhelming. This includes both physical evidence an ID found on the dead cop sillegally suppressed by the prosecution for 13 years, and numerous eyewitness accounts.
                              • I forgot to answer this one:

                                Brent also claims, "At the trial, Officer Faulkner's blood stained shirt was shown, mumia turned and smiled at Faulkner's widow.”

                                This is not true. Court records show that Mumia was not even in court that day.
                                • <<This is not true. Court records show that Mumia was not even in court that day.>>


                                  Mumiacs try and use this one a lot. As a matter of fact the shirt was shown in court twice. The first time Mjmia wasn't in the courtroom, the second time he was and this is when he flashed his smile at Mrs. Faulkner.

                                  Steven would know this if he read the court transcripts instead of Mumia propaganda.
                                  • I have read the court transcripts, have you Brent?

                                    So you claim this shirt was shown twice, once without Mumia present, and another time when Mumia was in court. Since you are so familiar with the trial transcripts, why don't you prove it by giving us the day and other relevant information so we can see it for ourselves?
                      • <<Faulkner was killed by Kenneth Freeman. >>



                        right, sure. He must have used Mumia's gun and gave it to back mumia and ran off, riiiiight....




                        • Brent says, "right, sure. He must have used Mumia's gun and gave it to back mumia and ran off, riiiiight...."

                          There is no evidence that Mumia's gun was used in the shooting.
                          • sure steven. His gun that was out of its holster with the chamber emptied.

                            and the bullets matched those calibre in Faulkner's body....
                            • Brent claims, "and the bullets matched those calibre [sic] in Faulkner's body...."

                              Even if this was true, which has not been proven, it would not mean that the bullets came from Mumia's gun. The prosecution has never been able to provide an adequate explanation of why the coronor first said the bullet was from a .44 and then the prosecution changed their explanation to say it was a .38. In the original trial Mumia's defense were not given enough money by Judge "I'll help you fry the nigger" Sabo, so the defense ballistics expert quit the job and the defense were never able to check the ballistics evidence with an expert for themselves. In an unprecedented move, Judge Sabo turned the ballistics evidence over to the police after the trial. After the bullet was turned over to the police, a fragment of it went missing, and it is entirely possible that the fragment was lost when the police switched the evidence.

                              Even if the police were playing fair with this evidence, which they didn’t do with anything else in this case, they still provided no proof that Mumia’s gun had been fired, nor any proof that the bullets in Faulkner came from Mumia’s gun.

                              According to eyewitness accounts, Kenneth Freeman was carrying a .38 that night and that is what Freeman used to shoot Faulkner with.

                              Brent also claims, "His gun that was out of its holster with the chamber emptied."

                              Mumia had a gun registered to him that he used to defend himself as a night cab driver.

                              There is no credible evidence that Mumia's gun was found next to him, and there was no evidence that Mumia's gun had been fired. No tests were done to see if Mumia’s gun had been fired. Those tests were never done because the police knew it had not been fired.

                              Despite claims by the police that they found the gun immediately, radio recordings proved they were still looking for it 14 minutes after they arrived. Some of the cops thought that the gun had left with the shooter on foot. Fourteen minutes was plenty of time to get the gun from Mumia’s cab, especially with Inspector Giordono in charge and on the scene, he was a corrupt cop who was in charge of repressive operations against MOVE and the Black Panther Party. Giordono also claimed that he heard Mumia confess on the ride to the hospital, but this fake confession was dropped when another cop present denied it happened.

                              The officer who found the gun also lied about how he handled the gun. Different cops had completely contradictory stories about how and when the gun was found. The Plakinoff photos, illegally suppressed by the prosecution for 25 years, show the gun being held in such a way that would have destroyed any fingerprints, this despite police lies to the contrary. Instead of putting the gun into evidence with the mobile crime unit, as is standard procedure, the police drove around with it for two hours before they delivered it to the station.
                              • <<The prosecution has never been able to provide an adequate explanation of why the coronor first said the bullet was from a .44 and then the prosecution changed their explanation to say it was a .38>>


                                ah, yes they have explained it. You just keep ignoring it

                                When asked to provide proof to support this allegation, Jamal's supporters point to a handwritten note made by Assistant Medical Examiner, Dr. Paul Hoyer. Dr. Hoyer's note said, "shot 44 Cal".

                                Dr. Hoyer testified at the 1995 PCRA Hearing and explained that his 1981 note merely reflected his speculation at what caliber the bullet might be, made when he first saw the wound and before he started the autopsy. The note was written on a piece of scrap paper, and was not a part of (and was never intended to be a part of) his professional findings.

                                Official ballistics tests done on the fatal bullet verify that Officer Faulkner was killed by a .38 caliber bullet, not a .44 caliber bullet. The fatal .38 slug was a Federal brand Special +P bullet with a hollow base (the hollow base in a +P bullet was distinctive to Federal ammunition at that time). It is the exact type (+P with a hollow base), brand (Federal), and caliber (.38) of bullet found in Jamal's gun. Additionally, tests have proven that the bullet that killed Officer Faulkner was fired from a weapon with the same rifling characteristics as Jamal's .38 Caliber revolver. Further, Jamal's own ballistics expert, George Fassnacht, conceded in his 1995 PCRA testimony that the fatal bullet was not .44 caliber, and that it was most "likely" a .38.

                                Dr. James Hoyer's handwritten notation on a piece of scrap paper certainly does not constitute such evidence. Dr. Hoyer, a medical doctor who has had no formal ballistics training, has never claimed that he was able to determine the caliber of the bullet. He plainly testified in 1995 that what he wrote was a "guess." Furthermore, Dr. Hoyer testified that, after writing this guess, he had measured the bullet with a standard ruler. Although he acknowledged that this was not the accepted scientific method by which to gage the caliber of a bullet, his rough measurement was consistent with the slug being .38 caliber, and not a .44. Finally, Dr. Hoyer testified that, at the time he made his .44 caliber guess -- while looking at the horrendous wound to Officer Faulkner's head -- he was unaware that the killer had been using high-velocity +P ammunition. Had he known this, he would not have assumed that the slug was of an unusually large caliber.

                                • Like I said, the prosecution has never been able to provide an adequate explanation of why the coroner first said the bullet was from a .44 and then the prosecution changed their explanation to say it was a .38. But since Kenneth Freeman was carrying a .38 that he used to shoot Faulkner, and since Arnold Beverly says he used a .22 and a .38, the point really is moot anyway.