Hopefully this will get nipped in the bud, but this is how it starts....

Monitoring Employees In A Secure Area
www.chiefengineer.org/content...2849.htm

The Chief Engineer,
February 2, 2007

Cincinnati video surveillance company CityWatcher.com now requires employees
to use VeriChip human implantable microchips to enter a secure data center,
Network Administrator Khary Williams told Liz McIntyre. McIntyre, co-author
of "Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every
Move with RFID," contacted CityWatcher after it announced it had integrated
the VeriChip VeriGuard product into its access control system.

The VeriChip is a glass encapsulated RFID tag that is injected into the
flesh of the triceps area of the arm to uniquely number and identify
individuals. The tag can be read through a person's clothing, silently and
invisibly, by radio waves from a few inches away. The highly controversial
device is being marketed as a way to access secure areas, link to medical
records, and serve as a payment instrument when associated with a credit
card.

According to Williams, a local doctor has already implanted two of
CityWatcher's employees with the VeriChip devices. "I will eventually"
receive an implant, too, he added. In the meantime, Williams accesses the
data center with a VeriChip implant housed in a heart-shaped plastic casing
that hangs from his keychain. He told McIntyre he had no qualms about
undergoing the implantation procedure himself, and said he would receive an
implant as soon as time permits.

" It worries us that a government contractor that specializes in
surveillance projects would be the first to publicly incorporate this
technology in the workplace," said McIntyre. CityWatcher provides video
surveillance, monitoring, and video storage for government and businesses,
with cameras set up on public streets throughout Cincinnati.

The company hopes the VeriChip will beef up its proximity or "prox" card
security system that controls access to the room where the video footage is
stored, said Gary Retherford of Six Sigma Security, Inc., the company that
provided the VeriChip technology. "The prox card is a system that can be
compromised," said Retherford, referring to the card's well-known
vulnerability to hackers. He explained that chipping employees "was a move
to increase the layer of security ... It was attractive because it could be
integrated with the existing system."

Ironically, implantable tags may not provide CityWatcher with that
additional safety, after all. Security researcher Jonathan Westhues
demonstrated how the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned by a hacker, who
could theoretically duplicate an individual's VeriChip implant to access a
secure area. Westhues, author of a chapter titled "Hacking the Prox Card"
for Simson Garfinkel's recent "RFID: Applications, Security, and Privacy,"
said the VeriChip "is not good for anything" and has absolutely no security.

" No one I spoke with at Six Sigma Security or at CityWatcher knew that the
VeriChip had been hacked," McIntyre observed. "They were also surprised to
hear of VeriChip's downsides as a medical device. It was clear they weren't
aware of some of the controversy surrounding the implant."

Although CityWatcher reportedly does not require its employees to take an
implant to keep their jobs, Katherine Albrecht, "Spychips" co-author and
outspoken critic of the VeriChip, says the chipping sets an unsettling
precedent. "It's wrong to link a person's paycheck with getting an implant,"
she said. "Once people begin 'voluntarily' getting chipped to perform their
job duties, it won't be long before pressure gets applied to those who
refuse."

Albrecht predicts that news of the security flaws will combine with public
squeamishness to make the VeriChip a hard product to sell, however.
"Obviously, nobody wants their employer coming at them with a giant
hypodermic needle. But when people realize it takes a scalpel and surgery to
remove the device if it gets hacked, they'll really think twice," she said.
"An implant is disgusting enough going in, but getting it out again is a
bloody mess."


Copyright © 2007, Chicagoland Chief Engineer All Rights Reserved
posted by:
Deborah
SF Bay Area

  • is this for real??

    this is simply frightening.

    welcome to the brave new world!

    thanks for posting this, Deborah.
    i had no idea this was already happening.
    • I have no doubt it is the future if "they" can get away with it.

      I want to stress that fear of this use should not prevent people from getting their pets chipped. Please do it as it will allow your pet to be traced back to you or the rescue you got pet from should pet be picked up as loose, lost or feral.

      Sorry, just had to stress that. It came up the other day from some possible adopters at the rescue I work at (in relation to this scary politicalt scenario).
      • I need to remind myself when I go in this afternoon a flyer I saw that I was going to google the website when I got back THAT day. Few months back now. Something about vets and rescues and pet owners might be forced to change from the current AVID system to I half think VeriChip. It was actually some bill before congress I think. I take things in at a busy moment and half remember them later, sorry.

  • <<Hopefully this will get nipped in the bud>>

    by whom?? Government??


    no, i'm afraid this is how it starts....

    • ><<Hopefully this will get nipped in the bud>>

      >by whom?? Government??

      In some cases, yes. Georgia is thinking about enacting a ban on implanting people with RFIDs
      www.ajc.com/metro/conten...gprivate.html

      and Wisconsin has already done so
      www.computerworld.com/action/article.do

      But generally, I think it's going to be up to people knowing about the issue and then saying "no".

      >no, i'm afraid this is how it starts....

      I'm not disagreeing with you.

      I've not seen anything yet though that suggests that "hundreds of thousands of people" have been implanted this way, but I know there is a move to do so.

      VeriChip wants to test implantable chips on people in the military
      www.informationweek.com/showAr...UNN2JVN

      And I've read in numerous places that VeriChip wants to tag Alzheimers patients and prisoners/parolees.

      And that's pretty much how it goes -- start with the marginalized groups or with groups that can't easily refuse (like in the military), add other medical reasons (what if you're in an emergency room and can't speak?), tag your kids (think of the children), and then it's pretty much a done deal.
  • will someone from the right please defend this? i am totally fascinated by the prospect of public acceptance!
    • That is my question! Who thinks, "okay why not?" and has a chip shot into their arm? Like the doctor in the article, is he so wrapped up in the cool new trick mindset that he actually thinks its a good thing?
      I have seen over and over again how much people can be like sheep, but I would hope that this would make them stop and say too far.
      • To me there is not a slippery slope in chipping animals for wildlife tracking and studies etc, and to make sure that Fido comes back to you if he jumps the fence.

        To me it's just flat out wrong to start on humans because of the civil liberties implications. That overrules all this talk even about it being used on children and employees abroad for personal safety etc. There are not civil liberties for the animals--pets or wild--that we should be protecting and making sure survive (as in using chipping to track endangered species).
        • Unsu...
           
          Hundreds of thousands of people already have these. It's just a matter of time before it is required of everyone. Chipping pets is great. But if you can see how that's a good thing then surely you can see how it's an even better thing for your children AND yourself?!!! The technology is perfected. Not only can it store information but it can also control your thoughts. Brave new world indeed. 1984. Etc.... Thought crime is not just a concept. It is a current reality! Supposedly after 08/08 it will be required. You will not be able to work or buy anything without it . Cashless society realized. Recognize! There is a huge thing with the dmv now which I can't remember wtf I was gonna bring up now. DAMN!!!!! Ruht Row!!!
      • That is my question! Who thinks, "okay why not?" and has a chip shot into their arm? Like the doctor in the article, is he so wrapped up in the cool new trick mindset that he actually thinks its a good thing?
        I have seen over and over again how much people can be like sheep, but I would hope that this would make them stop and say too far.
        >>>>>>>>>>>>.


        My wife and I along with other Freestaters helped start this organization.

        www.granitestateid.com/
        and we are members of this one too.
        www.nocards.org/

        Check out Katherine Albrecht she is a good friend of my wife and is an awesome NH lady.
        Check out her website and her book as well.

        www.spychips.com/
  • This is how it starts...then it will be a matter not just of employment, but of health insurance...eventually you will be unable to collect medical WITHOUT it. Then it will be kids...pedophile-paranoid parents who see pervs in every corner will implant their children. Then the elementary schools will do it to keep track of the kids, and a whole generation will grow up accustomed to the idea of being tracked..then the Social Security office will demand it and their whole generation will concede.

    There has to be a way to subvert these things.....
  • Company says RFID product would help troops, firefighters

    AP
    www.cantonrep.com/index.php
    Sunday, February 4, 2007

    A defense contractor is finding new uses for old technology _ ID tags that emit radio signals to help identify military allies and firefighters in burning buildings.

    Radio Frequency Identification technology has been around since the 1940s, but it is catching on as companies such as Spectra Research find new uses for it.

    Spectra is currently developing a tag it hopes will eliminate friendly fire deaths on the battlefield and find firefighters in peril inside burning structures, said Jerry Capozzi, Spectra's president.

    The company is developing the technology for the U.S. Army and Air Force, he said.

    "We are always looking for new technology to provide the best force protection for the American soldiers," Army spokesman Lt. Col. William Wiggins said.

    The tags, once developed, will be patches about the size of a checkerboard square and will easily fit in helmets, uniforms, equipment and armored vehicles.

    Fighter pilots and troops on the ground will scan an area with radar to see if friendly forces are there.

    Hand-held radar devices can detect the signals from more than 500 yards on the ground and more than 60 miles from the air, Capozzi said. The systems will be ready for the military in about two years, he said.

    The company has yet to determine the cost of each tag.

    Fire departments could us the tags to locate firefighters in burning buildings with electronic systems that hinder radio communications. Company officials approached fire departments about the product, but they declined because of concerns about costs, Capozzi said.

    Other uses could be helping department stores track and inventory their products. Spectral also wants to develop a tag to track animals, especially endangered species. Those also would have a military application because troops could use them during training exercises in areas where endangered animals may be, Capozzi said.
    • <Other uses could be helping department stores track and inventory their products. Spectral also wants to develop a tag to track animals, especially endangered species.>

      With this I have no problem, these animals are not in danger of losing civil liberties and this is one use which would assist in trying to save them from extinction.

      Any use on humans who are not fully able to consent, or are coerced by any means into getting implants (because of implied threats of loss of something or bribery in gaining something that should in no way be tied to have a chip inplant) should be illegal.

      I can't though see why anyone should be legally prohibited from being chipped if it's fully informed and consentual implantation and not made a requirement for getting something else. I am perfectly fine with people have things done to them under those conditions that would otherwise creep me out.

Recent topics in "! * POLITICS * !"