politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/200...-20/

LOGAN, West Virginia (CNN) – Political campaigns usually look to lower expectations – but one of Hillary Clinton’s supporters took the opposite tack Monday, setting the bar for a West Virginia primary win at an unprecedented high at an enthusiastic campaign event.

“You think this crowd’s noisy?” said West Virginia Senate Majority Leader Harry Truman Chafin. “Just wait ‘til we win like 80-20.”

“We’ve got to give her a vote tomorrow of 80-20 or 90-10,” he added moments later.

A campaign spokesman quickly tried to downplay Chafin’s remaks, saying “We appreciate his exuberance, but we're pretty sure this race is going to be much closer than that.”

Polls suggest Clinton will win West Virginia very easily — recent polls have shown her beating the Illinois senator by as much as 40 percentage points.

But Chafin isn’t the only one raising expectations.

Last week President Bill Clinton told a campaign crowd that ”all this stuff you are hearing about is an attempt to discourage you. That's what this is, pure and simple, hoping, 'Well, Hillary can get 80 percent of the vote in West Virginia', and if only 100,000 people show up it is not enough. But if 600,000 people show up, and you say, 'We want a president', then you will see the earth move.

There are 28 pledged delegates in play in West Virginia Tuesday, so a victory margin of 60-80 percent would allow Barack Obama to maintain a significant part of his 172 delegate lead, though it could slow his momentum.

Clinton herself didn’t completely shy away from the expectations game, calling Tuesday’s primary “a crucial turning point in this election.” She argued that voters’ primary objective should be to choose the candidate best suited to beat John McCain in the fall.

“I wouldn’t be doing this if I didn’t believe I could be the best president for West Virginia and America and that I was the stronger candidate to take on John McCain in the fall and make sure we have a Democrat in the White House,” she said.

Obama himself seemed happy to agree with the most optimistic Clinton campaign assessments. “I think President Clinton said that they are going to get 80 percent of the vote,” he told reporters in South Charleston Monday afternoon. “We’ll take him at his word.”


Im sorry but WV is incredibly racist and ignorant and that is why he will get beaten this badly. What will a defeat this badly mean to the public perception?
posted by:
Home
California
  • >> Home: Im sorry but WV is incredibly racist and ignorant and that is why he will get beaten this badly. What will a defeat this badly mean to the public perception? <<

    Anyone who has ever spent any time in places like New York, California, Maryland, Illinois, etc - knows that racism is very much alive and well in those states as well. Obama can't blame everything on racism - it certainly won't work as a general election strategy.

    It is just total bullshit to say that people are voting for Clinton because of racism. This kind of mindless knee-jerk racist-baiting is the kind of thing that pushes a lot of people far away from Obama - who wants anything to do with that crap?
    • <<Obama can't blame everything on racism

      That is a disengenuous statement being that Obama has not blamed anything on racism.
      • >> That is a disengenuous statement being that Obama has not blamed anything on racism. <<

        The context makes it crystal clear that I was responding to specific statement made by a specific person (Home). That person was offering an excuse as to why Obama will get trounced in WV - saying that it was due to racism. I responded that Obama cannot blame everything on racism.

        If I had been responding to a specific statement made by Barack Obama I would have quoted that and made it quite clear what precisely I was responding to. It's really not that difficult to understand.
        • What you were responding to does not negate the fact that it was a disengenuous statement to say "Obama cannot blame everything on racism." You even followed it up by indicating Obama can't run his campaign that way in the general, the inferrence being that this is what he is doing in the primaries.

          But of course we can agree to disagree... : )

          Cheers....
          • Gee, i thought it was Clinton accreditting her success to racism. You know, trumpeting her success among white uneducated people - stuff like that.
            • >> Kelly: Gee, i thought it was Clinton accreditting her success to racism. <<

              This is a plain outright lie. Clinton has pointed out the fact that Obama's appeal drops off dramatically outside the African American community. That in no way means that the people who don't support Obama are racist - it only means that he just doesn't have nearly as much appeal outside that one community as he does inside of it.

              Nowhere has Clinton ever "accredited her success to racism". To repeat - this is an outright lie on your part, Kelly.

Recent topics in "! * POLITICS * !"