Advertisement
It’s hard to not react to fear, so many things are posted on the internet that
when people react to it, it contributes to an increased atmosphere of hostility.
much of what some researchers here collect for others to look at simply
cannot be true, yet we fall into debate over it, causing division between us
when really what we need is to dispense with such fear mongering and find
solutions to our problems, whether they be social, political (internationally
or within our own countries), economical or otherwise. So I say be more creative,
being concerned constantly for how our contributions may affect those we argue
with, and making the best effort to speak from our knowledge, experience and
hearts, being aware of in which direction we want the future to go. A house divided
against itself cannot stand.
when people react to it, it contributes to an increased atmosphere of hostility.
much of what some researchers here collect for others to look at simply
cannot be true, yet we fall into debate over it, causing division between us
when really what we need is to dispense with such fear mongering and find
solutions to our problems, whether they be social, political (internationally
or within our own countries), economical or otherwise. So I say be more creative,
being concerned constantly for how our contributions may affect those we argue
with, and making the best effort to speak from our knowledge, experience and
hearts, being aware of in which direction we want the future to go. A house divided
against itself cannot stand.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 8:58 PMYou'd make a shitty anarchist Wormhole. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 8:59 PMAmerica has been divided against herself for decades and particularly devided this past near 8 years under the Bush Administration. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:13 PMJenn-Italia, learning to reach across the aisle is a useful skill that has to be relearned every congressional session. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 11:54 AM<< earning to reach across the aisle .>
Ah, the old "across the aisle reacharound."
Where would Congress be without it? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 10:53 PMost subject: Enlightenment, thereof Post aesthetics or esthetics: b. In Kantian philosophy, the branch of metaphysics concerned with the laws of perception.
Why are you unhappy? Because 99.9 per cent Of everything you think,
And of everything you do, Is for yourself - And there isn't one.
Ask the Awakened by Wei Wu Wei
Terence James Stannus Gray (14 September 1895 – 5 January 1986), better known by the pen name Wei Wu Wei, was a 20th century Taoist philosopher and writer.
Between the years 1958 and 1974 eight books and articles in various periodicals appeared under the pseudonym "Wei Wu Wei" (a Taoist term which translates as action that is non-action). The identity of the author was not revealed at the time of publication for reasons outlined in the Preface to the first book Fingers Pointing Towards the Moon (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958). Eventually it was revealed that the author had been Terence Gray.
Terence James Stannus Gray was born in Felixstowe, Suffolk, England on 14 September 1895 into a well-established Irish family and was raised on an estate outside Cambridge, England. He received a thorough education at Ascham St Vincent's School, Eastbourne, Eton and Oxford University. Early in life he pursued an interest in Egyptology which culminated in the publication of two books on ancient Egyptian history and culture in 1923. This was followed by a period of involvement in the arts in Britain in the 1920s and 1930's as a theorist, theatrical producer, creator of radical 'dance-dramas', publisher of several related magazines and author of two related books. He was a major influence on many noted dramatists, poets and dancers of the day, including his cousin Ninette de Valois, founder of the Royal Ballet (which in fact had its origins in his own dance troupe at the Cambridge Festival Theatre which he leased from 1926-33).
He maintained his family's racehorses in England and Ireland and in 1957 his horse Zarathrustra won the Ascot Gold Cup, ridden by renowned jockey Lester Piggott in the first of his eleven wins of that race.
After he had apparently exhausted his interest in the theatre, his thoughts turned towards philosophy and metaphysics. This led to a period of travel throughout Asia, including time spent at Sri Ramana Maharshi's ashram in Tiruvannamalai, India. In 1958, at the age of 63, he saw the first of the 'Wei Wu Wei' titles published. The next 16 years saw the appearance of seven subsequent books, including his final work under the further pseudonym 'O.O.O.' in 1974. During most of this later period he maintained a residence with his wife in Monaco. He is believed to have known, among others, Lama Anagarika Govinda, Dr. Hubert Benoit, John Blofeld, Douglas Harding, Robert Linssen, Arthur Osborne, Robert Powell and Dr. D. T. Suzuki. He died in 1986 at the age of 90.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terence_Gray
www.thespiritworks.com/wei_wu...oks.htm
www.thespiritworks.com/wei-wu...hy.html
The Spirit Works
Wei Wu Wei Books BOOKS FOR DREAMERS READY TO WAKE UP
Welcome to the wonderful world of Wei Wu Wei. What there is to know about “reality” is contained in these eight books. I love them all. My copies are dog-eared due to serial reading. As soon as I finish one, it’s on to the next, until I am back to the beginning, only to do it all over again. Why do I do this? Well, his answer would be the dream features me doing that in this dream. There never was a ‘me’ to do anything. When you first read this kind of an answer in his books, your inclination, in the name of resistance, is to think he is being “clever,” or “cute,” or even “metaphorical.” As your reading progresses, however, it begins to dawn on you that he is telling the absolute truth. In his interpretation of Buddhism, there is no relativity. There is no one to sort of be a person. In fact, he makes it very clear that as long as the dreamer retains any investment in the lie it is a ‘real person,’ with a ‘real ego,’ he is no closer to the truth than the day he set sail, in the guise of a ‘seeker,’ determined to discover truth.
The truth is the dream is always what ‘right now’ is; it is always ‘on,’ and it features ‘the dreamers’ mostly using time to play the part of ‘real people’ by pretending they forgot there is no one to be anything at all, let alone a person. The dream precludes the possibility anything is any more real than content in this dream. This dream features ‘the dreamers’ occupying the full spectrum of knowing, from those who know and never forget to those who know and depict ‘not knowing’ so convincingly they are immune to the truth they are dreamers delivering a personhood charade in a dream.
This dream, the one the dreamers, posing as people, refer to as “reality” is not about people. That’s not possible. As Hui Neng said way back in the dream, “from the beginning, not a thing is.” That dreamer wasn’t kidding when he made his statement, and the Buddha wasn’t kidding when he said “all life (in the dream) is about suffering” (because no dreamer can ever be anything but what it is). The same holds true for Wei Wu Wei. The telling of the truth reflects the stages of his awakening in the dream, but by the time you reach the end of the series, he is one with the truth that this Mind-generated dream is all about ‘the dreamers’ and what they do in this dream to pretend to be ‘real people’. Lies can’t cancel truth. No trick, no matter how clever on the dreamer’s part, can turn a dreamer in a dream into any kind of a person. The dream is a cliff hanger because ‘the dreamers’ resist truth and cling to lies as if someone’s life is at stake. This is what most dreamers get to do in this dream. This is ‘the plot’ in this dream, and, because no dreamer can ever be anything but what it is, the option to ‘wake up’ is imminent. You are a dreamer stuck in the fiction you are a person, or you show signs of ‘waking up’ in this dream.
It was from his eight books that this dreamer abstracted the core of his message and put it together as a way of providing dreamers with the reminders they require to let go of who they aren’t so they can enjoy who they are. Bliss includes the acceptance of the fact there is no one to be anything at all because everything can only be content in this dream. There isn’t anyone to have an ‘ego’ to struggle with, or modify. Upstream of the lie the dreamer is a person, it is liberated from the defense of the lie the ego exists. The lie the dreamer is a person depends on the lie someone exists to have one. It is the seeing of this clearly that elicits a smile, then a laugh and finally a crescendo of humor that triggers the endless ripple of ‘understanding.’
_________________
Endurance is one of the most difficult disciplines, but it is to the one who endures that the final victory comes. - Buddha
Profile Send private message E-mail Post details
Offline Report this post Warn user Delete post
prometheuspan
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined:
Sat 24 May, 2008 17:44
Posts: 2526
Edit | Quote
#2
Sun 28 Sep, 2008 23:47
Post subject: Re: Enlightenment, thereof Post You picked an interesting choice for forum to follow up on my request to post on what used to be your signature.
Sometimes I wonder at the way that they word things and think of better ways to express them,
and other times I'm not sure that its quite correct.
What I would say is that what is is a pattern, a hologram, a great cosmic song of fractal scalar equations. I don't think that calling it a "dream" is very productive for understanding it. At least not to
science or the western mind. Every time I have ever experienced the absolute has left me deeply shaken and humbled, awakened to the vastness of what truly is and my non significance in it, renders one psychologically small, like a tiny bird or a toddler. True relating with the ALL of WHAT IS is much like looking out at the ocean or up at the stars. Do it long enough and you can't help but be reminded how
small you are. The difference is that relating to the absolute if that happens occurs via the self cleared as a sounding board; ones own consciousness as a single eyeball. Or Ear. That can't happen so long as there is a self concept or an ego, because maintaining those illusions or psychological conditions is not silence.
What is real is that we are micro manifestations of the great master pattern; and we are holographically linked to the whole of the pattern. There is no true individuality because of the myraids of ways in which all things are interconnected. Selfishness is built into human instinct, but that is truly merely the predisposition of the animal and nothing more. Beyond that urge and outside of self hood or self concept, what we truly are is merely echoes of the initial scalar fractal equation, and we are not separate from each other or from the universe at all. The earth, the sun, the moon the stars; we are it.
What one stands to gain in terms of self concept is infinity, but only if the old self concept dies. The new self concept is that each of us is a god that does not exist; a face of the whole cosmos.
Consciousness in an individual is itself holographic and holomorphic, and our personal consciousness is a drop experiencing separation from the ocean. But we are the ocean. We are suspended in it, and we experience difference from it, but consciousness is an infinite and unbound waveform that merely stops
for a planck instant upon us before continuing to ripple outward. In this sense, consciousness is a ripple
in that ocean and our bodies experience consciousness only because secondary ripples form as consciousness refracts off of the animal mind. We are stones in the water. Consciousness bounces off of us. The physical self is experiencing consciousness or self because of this, and the animal mind chooses to interpret it the opposite of how it actually is; by internalizing it narccistically. But if we can embrace the truth that consciousness is actually outside not inside, we can learn to ride those ripples or those waves; to become far vaster than the rock or the body upon which those waves are crashing.
This can create trans mortal perspective. Once a person achieves it the beginning of the journey to ixtlan starts. Once you begin to identify with who and what we really are rather than the illusion or delusion of the animal mind, all other illusions become increasingly transparent, and because the vast majority of people are fixated on illusions, they are in a sense phantasmagorical. They cannot be real,
they cannot be solid, they cannot relate to reality or experience it, and they operate out of selfishness
and egotism and pack psychology when this can only in the long run cause themselves suffering.
On the other hand, enlightenment under such a definition is itself no piece of cake or walk in the park, because suddenly everyone else is infantile and alien, and even tho you are the one whos capable of going egoless, everybody else will accuse you of egotism if you try to explain to them they they are living in a delusional reality which only you can observe.
Its a sort of catch 22. They can't hear it, they can't see it, they can't know it, but they are sure and certain that their version of reality is real and that your version is crackpotted.
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:27 PM"devided this past near 8 years under the Bush Administration. "
There never was a time that we were united. Politics by nature divides. To blame political division on one side of the political spectrum is just blind partisan bullshit
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:01 PMwow, thats been my basic premise since i have been off the shock -the-morons-out -of -stupidity -with- the- truth- about -their -government
kick. The former actually seems to be more popular.
Solving problems and getting together is just contrary to the nature of the well programmed pawns of the propaganda war.
I keep telling people we need to become collaborative problem solvers, not arguers, and, for the most part, they don't come over because apparently they find bickering with morons entertaining.
My TALK TODAY;
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Announcements
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Feedback And suggestions
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Introduce Yourself
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Admin Reports + Complaints
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Orientation, Methodology, Guidelines
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
My Talk Today
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Design Philosophy
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Aesthetics
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Predictions
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Symbology + NLP
QUANTUM THOUGHT;
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Quantum Physics The First Key to Knowing
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Cause and Effect
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Conversational Logic
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Positive Dialogue
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Quantum Thought
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Resources
ISSUES;
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Civil Rights
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Energy and Environment
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Environment + Ecology
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Mass Transit
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Economy
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Poverty
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Education
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Healthcare + Disabilities
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Immigration
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Homeland Security
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Foreign Policy
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Middle East
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Military
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Veterans
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Technology
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Senior Citizens
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Rural And Urban
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Family And Community
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Gender And Human Sexuality Issues
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Media Reform
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Washington (and Governement) ETHICS
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Religion + Spirituality
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Space Exploration + Colonization
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Law, Crime, Police, Courts
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Manufactured Distractions
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Miscellaneous Issues
SCIENCE;
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Physics
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Chemistry
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Biology + Biochemistry
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Quantum Mechanics Macro
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Quantum Mechanics Micro
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Geology + Earth Sciences
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Civil Engineering + Architecture
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Meteorology
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Psychology
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Sociology
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Anthropology
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Political Science
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
History
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
systems and Game Theory
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
OBAMA!!
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
John Mccain
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Hillary Clinton
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
John Edwards
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Dennis Kucinich
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Mike Gravel
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Ron Paul
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Ralph Nader
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Others
LOUNGE;
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Hot topics
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Laughter is the best medicine
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Just Me
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Runts + Grunts
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Embassy of Board
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Debate
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Science Fiction Parables
MODERATORS;
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Discussions
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Open Court Of WE
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Open Source Cabinet
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Open Source Congress
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
WE THE PEOPLE LOBBY
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Depth Analysis
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Textbook Collaborators
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Letters to Editors and Such
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Thought Experiments
BLOGS of the Staff
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Pan + Prometheus
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Hostess Admin
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
JP Morgan
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
Expatasapien
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewforum.php
The YELLOW SUBMARINE
---------------
My TALK TODAY; Announcements, Feedback And suggestions, Introduce Yourself, Admin Reports + Complaints, Orientation, Methodology, Guidelines
My Talk Today, Design Philosophy, Aesthetics, Predictions, Symbology + NLP,QUANTUM THOUGHT;Quantum Physics The First Key to Knowing, Cause and Effect,
Conversational Logic, Positive Dialogue, Quantum Thought, Resources, ISSUES; Civil Rights, Energy and Environment, Environment + Ecology, Mass Transit,
Economy, Poverty, Education, Healthcare + Disabilities, Immigration, Homeland Security,Foreign Policy, Middle East, Military, Veterans, Technology,
Senior Citizens, Rural And Urban, Family And Community, Gender And Human Sexuality Issues, Media Reform, Washington (and Governement) ETHICS,
Religion + Spirituality, Space Exploration + Colonization,Law, Crime, Police, Courts, Manufactured Distractions, Miscellaneous Issues
SCIENCE;, Physics, Chemistry, Biology + Biochemistry, Quantum Mechanics Macro,Quantum Mechanics Micro, Geology + Earth Sciences
Civil Engineering + Architecture, Meteorology, Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology, Political Science, History, systems and Game Theory
PEOPLE WITH PLATFORMS;OBAMA!!, John Mccain, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Ron Paul, Ralph Nader, Others
LOUNGE;, Hot topics, Laughter is the best medicine, Just Me, Runts + Grunts, Embassy of Board, Debate, Science Fiction Parables
MODERATORS;Discussions, Open Court Of WE, Open Source Cabinet, Open Source Congress, WE THE PEOPLE LOBBY, Depth Analysis,Textbook Collaborators
Letters to Editors and Such, Thought Experiments, BLOGS of the Staff;Pan + Prometheus, Hostess Admin, JP Morgan, Expatasapien, The YELLOW SUBMARINE
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:08 PMHow about instead of one house we have fifty houses with decent roads . . . for a start. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:21 PM"How about instead of one house we have fifty houses with decent roads . . . for a start."
Actually it's a saying. Infrastructure is highly important. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:27 PMPrometheus, please try to limit the length of your posts for continuity's sake.
-----------
Your thread, your rules.
I'm just proud of my list, i worked most of the day on it and a few other things.
-----------
I agree somewhat, but keep a good attitude. Let's not *believe* any of the
propaganda. It's our world to create. I was just watching the debate, and
I noticed how McCain disliked the idea of heads-of-state meeting person
to person, specifically Ahmedinejad and our next president, without preconditions.
I really think those heads of state should put aside prior differences and
try to work together to find a means to ameliorate our current world problems.
-----------
Well that would be nice, but it aint gonna happen. The only way to create a real problem solving process is for US to do it.
And that isn't happening here and it is happening on my site.
-----------
Are all those blogpost links to things you have written?
----------
Thats a list of forums, anybody can join and anybody can post. My "blog" is third or fourth from the bottom, and its a forum.
You can have a forumblog 2 if you intend to use it and devote no less than 1 hour a week to the site.
:) -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:31 PMThe rules of any thread should be to remain civil. Be aware, I said, of how your words affect people.
Keep talking. I certainly never thought it was purposeful to exclude you. All that is behind us. If we can
observe some simple day to day rules of discourse, like we would in public or face to face, then you will
inevitably get better reactions out of people. Be that peacemaker.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:19 PMPrometheus, please try to limit the length of your posts for continuity's sake.
I agree somewhat, but keep a good attitude. Let's not *believe* any of the
propaganda. It's our world to create. I was just watching the debate, and
I noticed how McCain disliked the idea of heads-of-state meeting person
to person, specifically Ahmedinejad and our next president, without preconditions.
I really think those heads of state should put aside prior differences and
try to work together to find a means to ameliorate our current world problems.
Are all those blogpost links to things you have written?
T
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:11 PMMike C., we simply must establish just what an anarchist's creed would be.
It's rather obfuscated in popular understanding. Perhaps its time has not yet come. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:16 PMmike C thats not problem solving its fantasy jerk off.
Wormhole charlie; Anarchist is just another term for fucktard rebel without a clue.
I have never encountered an anarchist who had the first clue about sociology or cause and effect, or even one who could define a form of anarchism that wasn't patently stupid and evil. The only person i can think of who seems to have anarchist tendencies who i can also say seems to be intelligent and respectable is loki, and even then i think hes one of those caveat caveat qualifier qualifer type anarchists.
then again, I could be wrong, as he could have just been playing mind fuck in those threads where i was just lurking.
You never know with loki, some days he takes a side just to push your buttons.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:20 PMYou say tomato I say tomato. Let the audience decide. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:32 PM"You say tomato I say tomato."
Looks like the same word to me.
What shall the audience decide? Who is the audience, in most cases?
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:25 PMPrometheus, please keep the expletives out of it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:28 PMThe thread wasn't really about anarchism. It was about realizing the need to see things clearly
on the internet. I'm not really sure what Mike C.'s 50 houses reference might just mean.
I chose the title because I thought it would bring in that independent Perot "fix it" type of attitude. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:32 PMwell, I'm a fix it kind of guy. Notice the suffix; mytalktoday.com/SOLUTIONS.
As in problem, problem definition, problem solving process, solutions, fix problem.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:33 PMSo which problem do *you* want to talk about?
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:34 PMThe rules of any thread should be to remain civil.
-------------
unless we are visiting the klingons, in which case you do as the klingons do.
I'm sorry, this place ....
but anyways, i will certainly make an effort to respect you on your thread...
by being civil etc.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:37 PMSo which problem do *you* want to talk about?
---------
core root. Peoples inability to act, relate, communicate or think as problem solvers.
Lots of chit chat. lost of bickering. Lots of cheap chimp entertainment.
I post really very good informational threads and...?? crickets. Nobodies trying to solve problems, they assume its obamas or mccains job to solve problems and their job to fight the propaganda war as a pawn on one side or the other.
With pawn group number three making the game really complicated as with stephen argue.
Not a clue about sociology or civili engineering and no interest in becoming educated.
Thats the core problem.
Until that one gets addressed, the lot of the rest of it is pearls to swine.
"What shall the audience decide? Who is the audience, in most cases?"
Hes referring accidentally to the trollish peanut gallery.
of which he is a card carrying member.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:49 PMTry not to denigrate. Hold someone in high opinion, they will respond with better self-esteem.
I'm glad you're around. T^here are perhaps other things we should talk about.
Learning to see each other's perspectives is a hard thing to do well.
Like in your case. You have a condition which does make you different
than other people in general. I acknowledge that. And I can see where your
strengths and difficulties lie. It's best to back one another up, if strengths
compliment each other. Everyone should be aware of not enraging each other.
Then those that get regarded as special cases just might deliver better responses.
I won't bother to call out any names, we all have done it. A label like 'troll' really doesn't mean much.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:43 PM"but anyways, i will certainly make an effort to respect you on your thread...
by being civil etc."
Stellar!
How to make amends across those party lines? One party has this side, the other the other.
Power was supposed to be shared since the beginning of our government. Checks and balances. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:46 PMThe people decide through elections, that trumps everything. . .there is no mandate of power sharing that i have ever heard of. . . -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:53 PMHow to make amends across those party lines? One party has this side, the other the other.
Power was supposed to be shared since the beginning of our government. Checks and balances.
-------
the beginning of wisdom is understanding that the conflict between the two parties is almost entirely cosmetic.
They agree on all the fundamentals of how to keep the masses ignorant and enslaved, and how to keep everybody distracted and dumbed down.
Again, you are hopping back to the impossible and untenable. You have no power and no control over the parties, you can at best effect a few of the saner people who are here around you.
The problem solving process starts when we take personal responsibility each of us to work through it as if it were up to each one of us alone as an individual.
Shucking it back off onto the two party duopoly is just avoiding that responsibility. It would be nice if mom and dad could behave like adults, but they are both evil vampires, and they both exist to suck the life out of the common folks.
Revolution is the only solution, and the only type of revolution that is meaningful is a paradigm shift.
That happens when enough truth is concentrated in a small enough space and then enough people are exposed to that source of information. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:01 PMI agree to some extent Prometheus, but let's not look at our elected representatives that way.
That has an underlying subconscious effect. The end of your passage was very good though.
We really need to clean up those earmarks McCain was talking about. Reducing government
while keeping it effective and instilling the proper regulation for the markets are some of the
most important points.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:02 PM"That happens when enough truth is concentrated in a small enough space and then enough people are exposed to that source of information."
That is the piece-de-resistance......
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:09 PMTry not to denigrate.
-----------
how long have you been hanging out in this tribe?
90 percent of the conversations here consist of nothing more than denigration table tennis.
On top of that, I'm just speaking harsh truth.
------------
Hold someone in high opinion, they will respond with better self-esteem.
--------
there are several people around whom i hold in high esteem several of whom i also have serious disagreements with.
Loki, Cdub, Jimi, Catseye, sunshine, ....
there are a few others whom i hold in medium regard but whom i have learned i must keep at arms length, because i never know what direction they are going to turn next. Djarum, Inna, and Mike C come to mind. I have had positive interactions with them and negative ones,
and it often seems that i respect them a great deal more than they respect me,... the problem is the majority of the population here is neither respectable nor honorable, and finds the idea generally of intelligent conversation itself to be morally repugnant.
-----------
I'm glad you're around. T^here are perhaps other things we should talk about.
-----------
Thanks, I'm glad you are around.
---------
Learning to see each other's perspectives is a hard thing to do well.
Like in your case. You have a condition which does make you different
than other people in general. I acknowledge that.
---------
Thanks, lets be specific. From my perspective, I am quite literally for all practical purposes an incarnate alien.
My condition means that i live psychologically distant from humanity as a whole, and that i ths have enormous perspective
from outside of the box. It also means that i have very bad social skills and a whole lot lof knowledge, which in an anti intellectual culture
is certainly a bad scene waiting to happen- over and over and over again.
I have taken the time and energy (which is quite a considerable effort) to figure out what the problems and the solutions are.
Now, The chief problem is, people don't listen. Pearls to swine.
And probably its true that i suck ass at making myself appealing or advertising, but if sanity were the defining issue, that should be irrelevant. I have solved the problems. If people want something other than disasters and meltdowns and to be pawns, then they should
accept what i have worked all of my life to create for them as a gift.
And I can see where your
strengths and difficulties lie. It's best to back one another up, if strengths
compliment each other.
-------------
I very much agree and i am certainly not saying i have all of the answers, just that i can lead the way out of the mental cages and
that the answers i do have beat anything out there on a presidential platform.
What is needed is everybody changing their perspective to problem solving process, and that doesn't include electron orbitals around my ego, and i am very aware of that.
----------
Everyone should be aware of not enraging each other.
------------
Well, on your threads i will certainly follow your requests, but as i pointed out before, you are on klingon turf and thats just how they do it here. I'm just armouring because that is what has to be done to play the game as they have defined it. Its a sick game of which i disaprove, but i'd rather play it well than loose all the time because i refuse to play at all.
------------
Then those that get regarded as special cases just might deliver better responses.
I won't bother to call out any names, we all have done it. A label like 'troll' really doesn't mean much.
----------
It means plenty in my experience;
A person who by majority has communication without content and whose primary modus operandi is personal attacks is a troll.
In this forum and on most "tribes" everybody has to adopt some amount of troll, because its troll turf.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:28 PM
The chitchat thing is the part you don't see, Prometheus. It is perhaps because of your condition.
Certain areas of the brain may be affected as to emotional response. I'm sure that gets better in time.
-----------
I understand the psychology of why they do it just fine. That took a lot of years. My corpus collosum is both flat and wide and my mirror neurons don't work for empathy since they are tasked to mental simulation instead.
So i have a fine intellectual understandign of both me and humanz. This does not change the simple fact that you can't get the humanz to talk turkey, because they are much too busy entertaining themselves with drivel. That isn't me missing something because of my condition, its me seeing something which should be self evident to everybody more clearly than anybody because of my condition.
------------
Lorenzo makes many fine contributions. Intelligent and provocative at the very least.
-----------
I have had some wonderful interactions with him and some more questionable ones.
-----------
Steven, I really feel that is the wrong attitude. Please stay and reason it out though.
It is perhaps too early to expect a third party candidate to win a national election.
We all have our opinions though. Socialism may be the route to go eventually,
depending on one's view, but there is much to take care of first.
-----------
I tried to explain this to stephen some time back ago. The awful part is that I'd rather see his candidate in office than
obama or mccain, and there are many points i agree with him on. There are days when i see stephen as somewhat heroic.
The problem is the thinking is two dimensional. There is zero chance of a third party doing anything more than throwing the election to the republicans right now.
-----------
United we succeed. Divided we fail. Reach across party lines, racial lines,
cultural lines, so on. I wish I had the time to look at everyone's contributions,
like Steven's various rooms, but we all have limited time to ante in here.
------------
Its a refined and cultured taste, and you have to sample a lot of it to find the bits that are real gems, but it would be an ideal education for oh- say cliff.
Socialism as a total system is inoperable and can't work. There has to be a delicate balance between social programs and free enterprise, and that balance must sit on the fulcrum of genuine democracy, otherwise the system falls off into fascism or socialism or both
and the iron rule of oligarchies. The current system went off the deep end i nthe direction of corporatism, the balance needed could be called socialism,. but really that is a trap, because social services are not the same as socialism.
Most socialists are totally clueless about political science or economics, stephen hasn't given me any reason to think of him as an exception.
------------
I agree to some extent Prometheus, but let's not look at our elected representatives that way.
----------
What way is practical to bring about change?
I'm sorry, but the harsh truth is important here.
----------
That has an underlying subconscious effect. The end of your passage was very good though.
We really need to clean up those earmarks McCain was talking about. Reducing government
while keeping it effective and instilling the proper regulation for the markets are some of the
most important points.
------------
Frankly neither one of the candidates has the first clue about economics, and that is one more good reason to "flood"
my economics ideas to the forum.
Getting rid of earmarks is a great idea- at the very bottom of a very long list of much better ideas which are crucial to a good economy
whereas earmarks are just a red herring talking point.
-----------
All revolutions have been bloody, to some extent or another.
---------
Yes and no. Depends on what you call a revolution. Some would say there have been dozens of science revolutions where not a drop of blood was spilled.
-----------
Many left-leaning Americans were fooled by Leninist socialism,
which just turned out to be the basic form of totalitarianism that
Prometheus is talking about. True Marxism will never really
be effective until people are really less materialistic.
---------
Nobody knows what true marxism is, if they did they would call it marxist democracy.
As it is, when cliff reads this, hes going to assume its proof all three of us are commies.
But your point is important. Can't get there from here. No point in even trying. Lets just get back to an actual democracy,
and then after we can discuss implementing some exotic ideas from other systems.
------------
Strange paradox
that the one social order that talks about relieving the public of
their material distress is the one to reduce everything to the material.
------------
It was always about shadow projection. We diabolized the communists. We always were the REAL communists.
The soviets and China never were communist. Totalitarian and Fascist yes, Communist in name only, like us pretending to be a democracy while in fact being a corporate oligarchy.
-----------
But then those needs do really need to be fixed worldwide sometime soon.
---------
Yes, and that can be done from inside of the pradigm of democracy, so we don't need to complicate things beyond resolvability for those that can't see socialism as anything other than the form of evil their republican programmers warned them about.
---------
People want to believe in something, and plain Marxism doesn't really
fit the bill.
---------
I think DEMOCRACY fits the bill, and nobody has a knee jerk reaction against it.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:53 PMThe chitchat thing is the part you don't see, Prometheus. It is perhaps because of your condition.
Certain areas of the brain may be affected as to emotional response. I'm sure that gets better in time.
Lorenzo, I was just thinking of my vote come November. I've been working out of town.
I want to take the time off, I'm sure everyone want to vote that day and make their mark
on our political process, but it is hard. I just reregistered after 8 years out. Maybe I should
get the mail-in. I would like to vote at my polling place, though.
Lorenzo makes many fine contributions. Intelligent and provocative at the very least.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 10:50 AM>>have never encountered an anarchist who had the first clue about sociology or cause and effect<<
ergo
>>Anarchist is just another term for fucktard rebel without a clue.<<
Rather than bore us both with a lot of patience and careful attempts at education, I'll just remember that you're hostile to ethical governance and, despite all your talk, a pawn of the monarchs. Simple, pat, and nicely in-keeping with the hallowed platitudes of power.
Slaves rankle under the watchful eyes of the unpaid trustees and struggle against the lies of propagandists. Why, prom: you're all three! WTG! Lying slave trustee propagandist - the death of children is your fault. Cause and effect.
Try not alienating anarchists, and put down the absurd hauteur that serves as the apologia for your fellatio-oriented political views, and MAYBE someday all those "real world solutions" you hallucinate might become incrementally less fantastic to consider.
Denigrating anarchism is an important tool for capitalists, aristocrats, and pawns of said. Why volunteer, prom? Shouldn't you get paid for propping up evil? Doing it for free seems obscene and hypocritical.
[sharpens arrowheads and eyes the propagandist trustee with calm abiding]
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:18 PMAnarchy is a game of randomball or orderball randomly selected on a lined or unlined playing field.
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:29 PM"anarchist's creed "
Isn't that oxymoronic? -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:40 PMSo now two of them.Increasing the coefficient of drag.
Hardly surprising. Ron, can you use your mind but a little to
see why that was said in context? Or do you just wish to be disruptive,
like your fellow laggard? I am not a true anarchist, unless the
powers that be decide they want to hobble civilization.
Yoni, it does not serve you to try to rely on preteen junior high insults.
Though it does reflect on your stunted emotional growth.
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:44 PM
"There never was a time that we were united. Politics by nature divides. To blame political division on one side of the political spectrum is just blind partisan bullshit"
huh. I agree with Ron. Somebody call an ambulance.
"anarchist's creed "
Isn't that oxymoronic?
---------
yes, spoken by a true oxi moron.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:50 PMprom writes, "even the USA is technically a socialist corporatist oligarchy."
In the U.S. the capitalist class controls the economy and the government, at its core the police, courts, prisons, and military. The U.S. is a capitalist country, period.
There is nothing socialist about the United States.
And all capitalist countries are "corporatist" oligarchies.
------------
What you obviously fail to understand is that the definition of socialism is the government operating as an agency on behalf of non government agencies in terms of funding. Since the USA corporate oligarchy is in fact doing that, by the government giving all the money and power to the corporations, that is technically socialism. If its not the brand of socialism you were thinking of or trying to promote, thats not my fault or my problem. I certainly see the difference.
"Socialism refers to a broad set of economic theories of social organization advocating state or collective ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and the creation of an egalitarian society.[1][2] Modern socialism originated in the late nineteenth-century working class political movement. Karl Marx posited that socialism would be achieved via class struggle and a proletarian revolution, it being the transitional stage between capitalism and communism.[3][4]
All socialists share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth into a small section of society who control capital, and creates an unequal society. All socialists advocate the creation of an egalitarian society, in which wealth and power are distributed more evenly, although there..."
wikipedia -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:58 PMAn understanding and use of utilitarianism, for instance, would easily solve Prom's problem with flooding and allow his message to be more palatable to the audience he is and isn't looking for.
---------
Utilitarianism says you are all swine, and nothing i can do period ever can make any of you appreciate the value of a pearl.
You can be a utilitarian all you like, but I'm a bit more flexible than that.
There is no way to make a message which is complicated palatable for people who are loathe to think in terms larger than a single paragraph.
The problem isn't me, its cognitive dissonance and shit fer brains egotist narcisist anarchist trolls like yoni and etc who drive all conversations stupid.
Hes got a great set of excuses to give nobody any respect. The problem is, hes much less respectable because respect is a two way street. The other problem is, all he accomplishes is making people dumble down to his pathetic level.
You, on the other hand, are in some ways much more guilty of the same thing. "Universal truth" your tribe is not. Its garbage. Hilarious
and amusing, but universal no, and truth no. So all you are doing is playing bait and switch, and creating excuses to keep your mind a big flabby couch potato.
Dive dive dive all you like down to the lowest common denominator, And I'll keep tugging upwards to where the problems and the solutions are. You can call that flooding or accuse me of not understanding utility, but the truth is that I'm simply fighting a loosing battle against your choice to be an idiot. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:00 PMand why do they heckle?
-----------
to fluff their own egos in assurance while at the same time cowing and sheepleherding each other to remain zombies.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:07 PMhow many good looking women do you know will refuse a free drink or any of the benefits that go along with being attractive? how many physically intimidating men are going to back down from a confrontation when they know they are in the wrong? understand? at every level of our existence we exploit our advantages and fall into a pecking order whether it is a soulless fraternity or an art collective. and socialism inevitably fails because inevitably, the hierarchy will form. people with more power will like that power and use that power to ensure they stay in power. then the collective advantages intended for all will start to be less fairly distributed and the distortions will begin to undermine everything.
----------
What he is describing here is finally approaching intelligence and could be reframed as the iron law of oligarchies. (too bad hes so intentionally ignorant, he might be pleased to know somebody else thought this through even deeper than he did.)
And he is right. Modern sociology and political science now understands that democracy is a precarious balance between social services and free enterprise. If that balance falls off in either direction, the iron law of oligarchies takes over, and the civilization drifts either into capitalist fascism or socialist fascism, and, incidentally, and interestingly enough, as I tried to explain to the half ignorant socialist, one always ends up manifesting its polar twin. Socialism decays into corporate oligarchy always, and corporate oligarchy decays into corporate socialism always.
Iron law of oligarchy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The iron law of oligarchy is a political theory, first developed by the German syndicalist sociologist Robert Michels in his 1911 book, Political Parties. It states that all forms of organization, regardless of how democratic or autocratic they may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop into oligarchies. The reasons for this are the technical indispensability of leadership, the tendency of the leaders to organize themselves and to consolidate their interests; the gratitude of the led towards the leaders, and the general immobility and passivity of the masses.
Contents
[hide]
* 1 History
* 2 Reasons
* 3 Consequences
* 4 Examples and exceptions
* 5 Criticism
* 6 References
* 7 Further reading
* 8 See also
* 9 External links
[edit] History
Robert Michels was disturbed to find that, paradoxically, the socialist parties of Europe, despite their democratic ideology and provisions for mass participation, seemed to be dominated by their leaders, just like the traditional conservative parties.
Studying political parties, he concluded that the problem lay in the very nature of organizations. Modern democracy allowed the formation of organizations such as political parties, but as such organizations grew in complexity, they paradoxically became less and less democratic. Michels formulated the "Iron Law of Oligarchy": "Who says organization, says oligarchy."[1][2]
At the time Michels formulated his Law, he was an anarcho-syndicalist.[2] He later became an important ideologue of Mussolini's fascist regime in Italy.
[edit] Reasons
Michels stressed several factors that underlie the "Iron Law of Oligarchy." Darcy K. Leach summarized them briefly as: "Bureaucracy happens. If bureaucracy happens, power rises. Power corrupts."[2]
Any large organization, Michels pointed out, is faced with problems of coordination that can be solved only by creating a bureaucracy. A bureaucracy, by design, is hierarchically organized to achieve efficiency — many decisions have to be made daily that cannot efficiently be made by large numbers of people. The effective functioning of an organization therefore requires the concentration of much power in the hands of a few. Those few, in turn - the oligarchy - will then use all means necessary to preserve and further increase their power.[2][1]
This process is further compounded as delegation is necessary in any large organization, as thousands - sometimes even hundreds of thousands - of members cannot make decisions using participatory democracy; this has been dictated by the lack of technological means that would allow large number of people to meet and debate, and also the issues related to the crowd psychology as Michels argued people feel the need to be led. The delegation however leads to specialization: the development of bases of knowledge, skills, and resources among a leadership, which further serves to alienate the leadership from the 'mass and rank' and entrenches the leadership in office.
Bureaucratization and specialization are the driving processes behind the Law. These create a specialized group of administrators in a hierarchical organization. Which, in turn, leads to the rationalization and routinization of authority and decision-making, a process first and perhaps best described by Max Weber, later JK Galbraith, and to a lesser and more cynical extent, by the Peter Principle.
The organizational characteristics that promote oligarchy are reinforced by certain characteristics of both leaders and members of organizations. People achieve leadership positions precisely because they have unusual political skill; they are adept at getting their way and persuading others of the correctness of their views (see charismatic authority). Once they hold high office, their power and prestige is further increased. Leaders have access to, and control over, information and facilities that are not available to the rank-and-file. They control the information that flows down the channels of communication. Leaders are also strongly motivated to persuade the organization of the rightness of their views, and they use all of their skills, power and authority to do so.[1]
By design of the organization, rank and file are less informed than their "superiors." Finally, from birth, people are taught to obey those in positions of authority. Therefore the rank and file tend to look to leaders for policy directives and are generally prepared to allow leaders to exercise their judgment on most matters.
Leaders also have control over very powerful negative and positive sanctions to promote the behavior that they desire. They have the power to grant or deny raises, assign workloads, fire, demote and — that most gratifying of all sanctions — the power to promote. Most important, they tend to promote junior officials who share their opinions, with the result that the oligarchy becomes self-perpetuating. Therefore the very nature of large-scale organization makes oligarchy within these organizations inevitable. Bureaucracy, by design, promotes the centralization of power in the hands of those at the top of the organization.[1]
[edit] Consequences
The "iron law of oligarchy" states that all forms of organization, regardless of how democratic or autocratic they may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop oligarchic tendencies, thus making true democracy practically and theoretically impossible, especially in large groups and complex organizations. The relative structural fluidity in a small-scale democracy succumbs to "social viscosity" in a large-scale organization. According to the "iron law," democracy and large-scale organization are incompatible.
[edit] Examples and exceptions
An example that Michels used in his book was Germany's Social Democratic Party.[2]
The size and complexity of a group or organization is important to the Iron Law as well. During the 1970s and early 1980s, the Green Party of Germany made a conscious effort to try and break the Iron Law.[3] Anyone could be or could remove a party official. There were no permanent offices or officers. Even the smallest, most routine decisions could be put up for discussion and to a vote. When the party was small, these anti-oligarchic measures enjoyed some success. But as the organization grew larger and the party became more successful, the need to effectively compete in elections, raise funds, run large rallies and demonstrations and work with other political parties once elected, led the Greens to adapt more conventional structures and practices.
One of the most well known exceptions to the iron law of oligarchy was the now defunct International Typographical Union, described by Seymour Martin Lipset in his 1956 book, Union Democracy.[4]
Lipset suggests a number of factors that existed in the ITU that are allegedly responsible for countering this tendency toward bureaucratic oligarchy. The first and perhaps most important has to do with the way the union was founded. Unlike many other unions (e.g., the CIO's United Steel Workers of America, USWA, and numerous other craft unions) which were organized from the top down, the ITU had a number of large, strong, local unions who valued their autonomy, which existed long before the international was formed. This local autonomy was strengthened by the economy of the printing industry which operated in largely local and regional markets, with little competition from other geographical areas. Large locals continued to jealously guard this autonomy against encroachments by international officers. Second, the existence of factions helped place a check on the oligarchic tendencies that existed at the national headquarters. Leaders that are unchecked tend to develop large salaries and a more affluent lifestyle that makes them unwilling to go back to their previous jobs. With a powerful out faction ready to expose profligacy, no leaders dared create sumptuous personal remuneration. These two factors are quite compelling.
Lipset and his collaborators also cite a number of other factors which are specific to craft unions in general and the printing crafts in particular, including the homogeneity of the membership, with respect to their work and lifestyles, their identification with their craft, their more middle class lifestyle and pay. For this latter point he draws upon Aristotle who argued that a democratic polity was most likely where there was a large, stable middle class, and the extremes of wealth and poverty were not great. Finally, the authors note the irregular work hours which led shopmates to spend more of their leisure time together. These latter factors are less persuasive, since they do not apply to many industrial forms of organization, where the greatest amount of trade union democracy has developed in recent times.(taken from:Lipset's Union Democracy After 40 Years)
[edit] Criticism
Critics have challenged the iron law of oligarchy and its underlying assumptions. Orthodox Marxists dispute whether increasing bureaucracy means increased power for the bureaucrats. Others questioned whether power 'corrupts' and leadership becomes unaccountable to the masses. Some have also claimed that small organizations with little bureaucracy should be able to avoid the iron law, which Michels claimed is unavoidable for all organizations.[2]
[edit] References
1. ^ a b c d Frank W. Elwell, Max Weber's Home Page "A site for undergraduates" at Rogers State University]. Last accessed on 27 May 2006
2. ^ a b c d e f Darcy K. Leach, The Iron Law of What Again? Conceptualizing Oligarchy Across Organizational Forms, Sociological Theory, Volume 23, Number 3, September 2005 , pp. 312-337(26). IngentaConnect
3. ^ Whatever happened to the German Greens? - Red Pepper
4. ^ Citation Classics Commentary on Union DemocracyPDF (254 KiB), Seymour Martin Lipset, 20/1988. Last accessed on 16th September 2006
* Robert Michels und das eherne Gesetz der Oligarchie by Gustav Wagner in "Wer wählt, hat seine Stimme abgegeben" Graswurzel Revolution pp. 28
[edit] Further reading
* Michels, Robert. 1915. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Translated into English by Eden Paul and Cedar Paul. New York: The Free Press. From the 1911 German source.
[edit] See also
* Coordinatorism
[edit] External links
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:10 PMYou're obviously assigning no value to the people that have the skills you lack, Prom. It's classic narcissism.
-----------
You are obviously a halfwit whos not paying attention. I assign great value to other peoples skills which I lack, otherwise i'd have a blog, not a BBS.
Calling an aspie narcisstic is laughable. My ego disolves at my will. Yours is a big fat square block which makes you into a block head. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:20 PMI think they call that projection. Just a gut feeling.
<<<You are obviously a halfwit>>>
I'm keeping the other half reserved as a hedge.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:41 PM"Modern sociology and political science now understands that democracy is a precarious balance between social services and free enterprise. If that balance falls off in either direction, the iron law of oligarchies takes over, and the civilization drifts either into capitalist fascism or socialist fascism, and, incidentally, and interestingly enough, as I tried to explain to the half ignorant socialist, one always ends up manifesting its polar twin. Socialism decays into corporate oligarchy always, and corporate oligarchy decays into corporate socialism always."
I think you have something there. I'm excerpting it so that people can more easily find it.
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:01 PMYou're obviously assigning no value to the people that have the skills you lack, Prom. It's classic narcissism.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:19 PMProm, the flooding is for the repetitive stuff you post that we *don't* want to read.
I find your rants highly humorous. More of that. Less of the spiels on ethics,
the local buzzards don't get it, and it bores me. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:21 PM
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:05 PM
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 10:53 AM>>"anarchist's creed "
Isn't that oxymoronic?<<
Only if you're ignorant of the term's meaning.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:11 PMWormhole Charley says:
"so many things are posted on the internet that
when people react to it, it contributes to an increased atmosphere of hostility."
and
"what we need is to dispense with such fear mongering and find
solutions to our problems, whether they be social, political (internationally
or within our own countries), economical or otherwise."
I do agree.
I have thus far found this tribe to be interesting and refreshing. Because here I see people that will debate, brawl, and sometimes get along or apologize.
There IS value in comments. Even the most attacking type of comments represents someone, somewhere. It might be a stereotype played up online, or a reflection of the inner person. Either way, we still have to deal with comments like these in the world. We have people who will agree, disagree, battle, just insult, funny people, serious people, extremely knowledgeable people and those just beginning on their foray in political topics.
Someone's going to like you for the very reason someone else dislikes you. That is life. It's too easy to fall into a pattern over time where people stop listening, stop trying, and just attack each other all the time. You see it in political candidates and you see it political partys and you see it in people.
I feel like I am standing in the middle of a merry go round, and all these issues have opposites or opposition. So the zebra is always opposite the giraffe. The hippo opposite side from the elephant. But we're all on the same ride! -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:24 PMdjarum, very interesting metaphor. Opposition isn't the only means of accomplishing anything, though.
Triangulation or other means also work. As long as it's friendly. Civil, I mean. Mostly civil. Very well
written post, just exactly what I was hoping for. Creative.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:49 PMUnited we fail.
Vote Socialist
www.socialequality.com/
Liberation News
lists.riseup.net/www/info/...ation_news -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 9:57 PMSteven, I really feel that is the wrong attitude. Please stay and reason it out though.
It is perhaps too early to expect a third party candidate to win a national election.
We all have our opinions though. Socialism may be the route to go eventually,
depending on one's view, but there is much to take care of first.
United we succeed. Divided we fail. Reach across party lines, racial lines,
cultural lines, so on. I wish I had the time to look at everyone's contributions,
like Steven's various rooms, but we all have limited time to ante in here. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:11 PM
When there is unity between the Democrats and Republicans it is unity against the interests of the majority in favor of the interests of the ruling wealthy minority (plutocracy).
When there is disagreement among them there is less of a chance they will take more action against us, so there is less of a chance that they will screw us over.
Democrats and Republicans united? In these situations we (the non-ruling wealthy majority) always fail. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:26 PMSteven, that wealth is failing. They took too much out as draws, benefits, and exit packages.
It really is the consolidation of the party ideologies into a block that creates part of the problem,
if they allowed individual voices to make sense within the whole, consensus and rationality
would rule. We do need those banking institutions, we cannot desert them, but they must
be properly regulated. Modern society requires commerce. Usury has to be allowed for a while
yet. It happens because there is no more manifest destiny, so to speak (though I acknowledge
that that 'destiny' relied on taking from other peoples), and in all reality we need to start to look at
retrieving some resources from nearby space. Insofar as energy for the next 100, 200 years.
Get off coal and oil in a slow process, modify our living conditions to allow for greater environmental
clean-up, create those sustainable energy alternatives, then reach for space, like JFK advised.
As a race. There are stepping stones available. We just have to order our governments logically,
get off the junk of tribal and international warfare, take care of our responsibilities as far as our
poorer neighbor nations, then make headway into space. It's a full feast out there. We just have to
come together to make it happen. Warring over old broken bones just won't accomplish anything.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:30 PM> It is perhaps too early to expect a third party candidate to win a national election.
With the current election system it will never happen - so to change this is one of the things necessary for a real change in this country.
I'd be really curious how many workers, farmers, physicians are representing the people in the House or in the Senate ... not to speak from the White House ...
This is something absolutely normal in Europe ... and you don't need any private money to get elected ...
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:08 PMAll revolutions have been bloody, to some extent or another.
Many left-leaning Americans were fooled by Leninist socialism,
which just turned out to be the basic form of totalitarianism that
Prometheus is talking about. True Marxism will never really
be effective until people are really less materialistic. Strange paradox
that the one social order that talks about relieving the public of
their material distress is the one to reduce everything to the material.
But then those needs do really need to be fixed worldwide sometime soon.
People want to believe in something, and plain Marxism doesn't really
fit the bill. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:13 PMAnd above all, don't see the political opposition as evil. Stop that.
I know there are all kinds of paranoid propaganda on the web,
but most of it is just from a desire to make sense of world history.
A lot of it is way out on a limb. Even farcical. But is an attempt to make
sense of what has gone before. A weird jambalaya, definitely.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:19 PM
When people know that the material wealth they produce only enriches others, that they will only have less and less under this system while those on top will only have more and more, that wars are being fought for the windfall profits of the corporate elite, and that the entire planet is quickly being destroyed for corporate profit, at that point socialism makes sense. Socialism needs to be democratic and has yet to be tried.
Liberation News
lists.riseup.net/www/info/...ation_news -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:32 PMThat's why we have to share what's here, Steven. Factories, maquiladoras and such churn
out all kinds of knickknacks, most of which is as temporary as the morning newspaper.
Much of what we collect is for vanity alone. Basic needs first. For everyone. But through multiple
modalities: government, church, charities, so on. Once everyone's basic needs are met and
they are functioning members of society across the world, then the world as a whole can progress. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:42 PM
>> Once everyone's basic needs are met and
they are functioning members of society across the world, then the world as a whole can progress. <<
most people are complete morons. fuck em. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:45 PM
Yoni says in a modern version of let them eat cake, "most people are complete morons. fuck em."
No Yoni, fuck you.
The majority is being screwed by a tiny minority, a minority Yoni supports, but when we wake up and get organized, this system is finished. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:48 PMSteven, don't start. Yoni is a person just like you. Forget whatever went before,
don't start degrading the thread. Be the better person always. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:50 PMWhat you say to each other is very important.
Read the first post again to get a sense for it.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:51 PM
"Be the better person always."
I am. At first I was nice to Yoni. But I've never seen Yoni be anything but a stupid insulting prick who throws ignorant attacks against me in favor of the unjust status quo. And here, once again, he shows his total hatred and contempt for the people. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:02 PM
>> But I've never seen Yoni be anything but a stupid insulting prick who throws ignorant attacks against me in favor of the unjust status quo. <<
i.e. I hurt his feelings when I made him look like an idiot. and it was all for his own good. it is healthy for stupid losers to know they are out of their depth.
you want to make the world a better place. shove the idiotic stalinist shit up your ass and review your calculus and linear algebra. spend a little time learning SQL or a scripting language... and if you ever gain proficiency, encourage other people to do the same.
but no. Steven just epitomizes the bitter shut-in desperately clutching at some grander than life identity in order to compensate for life circumstances. and from my perspective, humoring that kind of failure is tantamount to cheering it on. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:14 PM
"i.e. I hurt his feelings when I made him look like an idiot."
It is I who has made Yoni look like an idiot. I just tire of Yoni wasting my time with his moronic uneducated statements.
Case in point. He claims I'm a Stalinist. This is another blatant lie from Yoni.
Why bother with such a blatant unashamed raving rightwing liar? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:18 PM
god forbid. wouldn't want to waste the time of an unemployed twerp like you.
and you realize none of this would have happened if you hadn't tried to bluff a background in biochemistry. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:24 PM
I'm not unemployed and I have never bluffed anything.
Who the fuck are you to keep on making up such slanders?
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:23 PM>> Who the fuck are you to keep on making up such slanders? <<
your father.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:47 PMYoni, please don't say that. Do you regard certain racial groups as more liable to
react to education better than others? Have you ever read that old book 'The Bell Curve',
I think it was called? Long-instilled ideas about racial stereotypes can cause bitter
feelings between races, and I think you will agree that everyone reacts equally well
to education whatever their ethnic type. Learning disabilities don't even hold most
back, if effort is made by teachers. And physical deficiencies don't even hold back
in this day and age. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:50 PMYoni, please don't say that.
---------
U were somehow extremely fortunate in that all of the original posters to your thread were sincere thoughtful folks.
U can TRY to reason with Yoni, but again, we are back to the usefulness of the word "troll".
He doesn't care about your good intentions, he only wants to shut you down, because he hates intelligent discussions because
it reminds him of something he believes himself to be incapable of.
It makes more sense to ignore him. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:54 PMRead the first post again to get a sense for it.
---------
it is an honorable and wonderful goal which unfortunately can't be achieved with folks who have chosen to live life as culture warriors.
You can try it, but there is a reason why stephen and i both more or less blow him off with a nice swat to the face; Showing ones nice side to a klingon only convinces them you are weak.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:03 PM -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:10 PM#
nope. laziness holds people back. and ignorance and hostility. so fuck it. the moron in a Trailblazer tailgating the old lady in the slow lane... you know the guy with the pissing Calvin. or the moron with the Raider's decal ready to pull a gun because someone beat him out of a parking space. or the impulsive moron that feels entitled to a bailout after betting it all on a house thinking that he was only going to own for a couple years and sell because the price of real estate always goes up...
the world is full of that. and then there are smart people that bust their asses to learn and be better. they matter. morons don't.
-------------
So shut the fuck up and commit hari kari already.
------
"yeah, it's always someone's fault that socialism ends up not working."
Capitalism has always been the biggest failure in the world.
As for socialism not working, like I said, it has never been tried.
-------------
Hes right. Its never been tried. On the other hand, I don't have to jump off the cliff to understand I'd go splat at the bottom.
---------
>> But I've never seen Yoni be anything but a stupid insulting prick who throws ignorant attacks against me in favor of the unjust status quo. <<
i.e. I hurt his feelings when I made him look like an idiot. and it was all for his own good. it is healthy for stupid losers to know they are out of their depth.
-------------
You don't have the intelligence to make him look like an idiot, all you can do is fluff your ego and pretend.
-----------
you want to make the world a better place. shove the idiotic stalinist shit up your ass and review your calculus and linear algebra. spend a little time learning SQL or a scripting language... and if you ever gain proficiency, encourage other people to do the same.
---------
You are a fucktard who can't even pay attention. What did we just say? Stalin and Lenin Murdered socialism, and the socialists.
We are talking about MARX.
-------
but no. Steven just epitomizes the bitter shut-in desperately clutching at some grander than life identity in order to compensate for life circumstances. and from my perspective, humoring that kind of failure is tantamount to cheering it on.
--------------
From your perspective where? at the bottom of satans outhouse?
You have no perspective, you are a fucktard troll whos got no business on an intellectual conversation thread. So piss off.
------------
>> because he hates intelligent discussions <<
yeah. that must be it.
-----------
prove me wrong. Say something meaningful and collaborative.
I'll bet you can't.
----------
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:03 PM>> because he hates intelligent discussions <<
yeah. that must be it. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:12 PMI think it is time to say something constructive to each other.
I've got nothing against any of you. We all have our own perspectives.
I have read Yoni's words and found something in them, quite a few times.
I can say that of many people. If we are honest with one another, we can
find areas to agree in. I even found Cliff to be a good conversationalist
in PM's. Find common ground and give up all that invective. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:18 PMdid you check out the purple dialogue links i posted? They might be helpful for you in this quest.
:)
Stephen and I are both adult enough to agree and disagree and still have a conversation. Some people are not.
Cliff is in my mind a bit of an idiot, but hes only a troll when hes off his meds. Yoni has never in my experience had anything to offer BUT invective, and his perspective is truly pathetic and the bottom of the barrel. The only way to move forward is for those of us capable of doing so
to abandon and ignore the troll, best after making it clear that its unwelcome.
Heres some more interesting materials for your peace making mission.
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewtopic.php
www.cnvc.org/node/369
www.cnvc.org/en/what-nvc/nvc-mod ... onents-nvc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonv...munication
Nonviolent communication (NVC) is a process developed by Marshall Rosenberg and others which people use to communicate with greater compassion and clarity.[1] It focuses on two things: honest self-expression — exposing what matters to oneself in a way that's likely to inspire compassion in others, and empathy — listening with deep compassion. Formal NVC self-expression includes four elements: observations (distinguished from interpretations/evaluations), feelings (emotions separate from thoughts), needs (deep motives) and requests (clear, present, doable and without demand). [2]
Those who use nonviolent communication (also called "compassionate communication") describe all actions as motivated by an attempt to meet human needs. However, in meeting those needs, they seek to avoid the use of fear, guilt, shame, blame, coercion or threats. The ideal of NVC is to get one's own needs met while also meeting others' needs. A key principle of nonviolent communication that supports this is the capacity to express oneself without use of good/bad, right/wrong judgment, hence the emphasis on expressing feelings and needs, instead of criticisms or judgments.
Contents
[hide]
* 1 Definition
* 2 Focuses
* 3 Processes
o 3.1 Honest self-expression
o 3.2 Empathy
* 4 Formal vs. colloquial
* 5 Nonviolence
* 6 Programs
* 7 See also
* 8 Notes
* 9 References
* 10 External links
[edit] Definition
Rosenberg gave the following definition of nonviolent communication at Lausanne, Switzerland, in September, 2003:
"Language, thoughts, communication skills and means of influence that serve my desire to do three things:
* to liberate myself from cultural learning that is in conflict with how I want to live my life.
* to empower myself to connect with myself and others in a way that makes compassionate giving natural.
* to empower myself to create structures that support compassionate giving."
[edit] Focuses
In NVC, priority is given to creating a high quality of connection between people, and to oneself. It is observed that without connection, effective communication cannot occur.
Maintaining a focus on needs is a central premise. Needs, as the term is used in NVC, are underlying motivations that are universal, in that we all experience the same needs, even if at different times and to different degrees. Thus, needs serve as a basis for understanding each other's motivations at a level at which it is easy to be sympathetic to those motivations. Needs are distinguished from strategies, which are specific plans to try to meet needs. If people interact only with an awareness of strategies, it is easy for people's strategies to come into conflict. Operating from an awareness of needs increases flexibility, insofar as there are typically many strategies that could lead to a given need being met. NVC practitioners also tend to find that it can be deeply satisfying to be aware of needs; perhaps this is because needs offer meaning.
Ultimately, the various processes and attitudes suggested by NVC are strategies designed to "serve life" — to increase the joy and well-being of all. Quality connections and a focus on meeting everyone's needs serve these ends.
[edit] Processes
The three core processes of NVC are self-empathy, empathy for another, and honest self-expression.
[edit] Honest self-expression
The self-expression process described in the model consists of four steps:
1. To observe without evaluation, judgement, or analysis;
2. To look for feelings behind words that are expressed;
3. To look for unmet needs, connected to these feelings; evaluating which needs are not (yet) being met instead of evaluating actions in "right" and "wrong";
4. Make a request how another person could enrich life. Essential in this is that the other person is to be left free to honour or decline the request.
In this recipe, offering an observation serves to give the listener a reference as to the subject. Offering a feeling (uncontaminated by interpretation and blame) tends to increase connection. Offering a need provides connection and meaning. Finally, a request offers clarity as to what the speaker wants.
It is observed that demands (for which there is only one "acceptable" response) do not meet the recipient's need for autonomy and tend to produce either submission or rebellion. Typically, neither of these responses is enjoyable for both parties. Both responses foster resentment and strain the relationship. In contrast, it is felt that the consistent use of requests (for which no answer will trigger retaliation of any kind) leads to people experiencing the joy of giving. People will often say "yes" to a request out the desire to contribute to one another, which NVC practitioners maintain is a stronger and more universal motivation than is commonly recognized.
If a request yields a "no," the suggestion is to interpret that as information that a need exists that the requester was not aware of and may want to investigate. The need that originally motivated the request is more likely to be met through a strategy that respects all needs.
[edit] Empathy
Empathy, as practiced in NVC, is a somewhat subtle concept involving understanding the essential core of an individual's experience and a kindly "energy" of connection and "presence." The explicit empathy process offered by NVC is often itself referred to as "giving empathy." It is more accurately a procedure that supports the development of true empathy. This process involves guessing the feelings and needs of another (empathy for another), or sensing one's own feelings and needs (self-empathy). The empathy process for another may be conducted out loud, as an interaction with that person, or silently, as an inner approach to awareness of that person's experience.
Empathy brings about understanding of the needs of the one "receiving" empathy, and also relieves emotional charge. Emotional charge is often uncomfortable and is a barrier to being able to hear others clearly and respond in a flexible fashion. Thus, empathy may be used to relieve distress and increase understanding and readiness for hearing.
[edit] Formal vs. colloquial
When using NVC to communicate, one may use either formal or colloquial NVC. In formal NVC, one explicitly uses the steps of the processes for empathy and honest self-expression, and may overtly use words such as "feel" and "need." This may be well-received and effective, or may be experienced as odd and stilted. As an alternative, one may use colloquial or "street" NVC, in which the language is naturalized and may be considered NVC regardless of form so long as it springs from an awareness of needs and an intention to connect.
Formal NVC is primarily used in teaching NVC and among NVC practitioners. Mastering formal NVC is recommended as a prerequisite to full effectiveness in speaking colloquial NVC.
[edit] Nonviolence
The name "nonviolent communication" refers to Gandhi's philosophy of ahimsa or nonviolence. However, unlike Gandhi, Rosenberg endorses the use of protective force—the use of force to keep injury from occurring, so long as it is not punitive, i.e., force applied with the intention to punish or harm someone for a past deed. Rosenberg says the desire to punish and the use of punitive measures only exist in cultures that have moralistic good/evil worldviews. He points out that anthropologists have discovered cultures in many parts of the world in which the idea of someone being "bad" makes no sense. He says such cultures tend to be peaceful and do not rely on punitive force to correct maladaptive or harmful behaviors.
[edit] Programs
Rosenberg has used the concept of nonviolent communication in peace programs in conflict zones including Rwanda, Burundi, Nigeria, Malaysia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Colombia, the Middle East, Serbia, Croatia, and Ireland. The approach also has been used in projects of Restorative Justice; bringing prisoners, victims of crime, police and other interested parties together for healing and reconciliation. NVC is recognized by the government of Israel and several NVC training schools have been founded there.[3] The theory has much in common with concepts used in mediation and conflict resolution and is used by some mediators in their work.
[edit] See also
* Alternatives to Violence Project
* Teaching for social justice
* Restorative justice
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:24 PM"Socialism must overthrow capitalism, and, for the workers to rule as advocated by Marx, it must be democratic. This has never been tried. "
Sigh. You're hanging on to a pipe dream.......
-----------
pan- in the middle- again.
Its unfair to say hes hanging on to a pipe dream and in any case, he can't hear you when in the next breath you demonstrate you don't understand it.
I agree with you in general principle and have stated so.
----------
You can say that socialism has never been tried, and you might be right. Maybe the kind that Marx wrote about has never been really put in to place. But governments HAVE tried,
---------
No. Listen very carefully. No government on earth has EVER tried to implement marxism. all the propaganda that you think you know to be fact is by vast majority republican lies. In fact, no government on earth has ever even tried to implement communism either.
The soviets were an oligarchy. China is an oligarchy. Thats not socialism and its not communism.
please, don't make me post long winded diatribes on political science and forms of government.
-------------
and once you get past the theory of it....put into practice it's horrible.
---------
No, oligarchy and totalitarianism are horrible. Socialism has never been tried.
From systems theory or from formal political science, socialism in the much less formal sense has spontaneously occured accidentally
in assorted forms of oligarchy, including our own government. But as an entire governmental system, it has never been tried. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:27 PMWell, I'm turning in soon.
----------
me 2. Thanks for a great thread start and a wonderful sense of direction. Its still in doubt whether this forum can accomodate you. I rather doubt it.
MY place on the other hand is already working with no trolls and collaboratively, so you may just want to pm all your friends and come on over.
:)
good night. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:28 PMWho the fuck are you to keep on making up such slanders?
----------
i think troll is referring to me.
i can barely remember, it seems yoni thought that merely washing food would get rid of e coli, or some such nonsense.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:33 PM>> i can barely remember, it seems yoni thought that merely washing food would get rid of e coli, or some such nonsense. <<
really? I'd love to see that.
it's always amusing when a complete nincompoop foists his preconceived notions on me. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:35 PMYoni, start contributing positively.
Make me laugh or leave. Got it? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:37 PM
>> Make me laugh or leave. <<
not exactly my top priority. so sorry. I'm here at the moderator's discretion. if you don't like my presence, bring it up with him.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:37 PMSlinging stupid insults only makes me look at you as if you are a rotten corpse floating in turgid waters. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:43 PM
>> Slinging stupid insults only makes me look at you as if you are a rotten corpse floating in turgid waters. <<
wow! so... how do you think the Patriots are going to do this year? -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:47 PM"wow! so... how do you think the Patriots are going to do this year?"
C'mon, use that prefrontal cortex. The Patriots just lost their long time QB, correct?
So I imagine not as well as usual (unless the stand-in suddenly remembers
just how he did his schtick in HS.) -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:48 PMWho am I talking to, Al Bundy?
Do you have your hand in your pants?
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:45 PMNow, can one see why being positive is the best policy? Is there a reason to go around
constantly trying to stir up trouble and hate? What kind of person believes it is proper
to dump all their negative feelings around others to make them deal with it? Someone
who basically needs a 'backscratch'. Someone unwilling to stare deep into their own
darkside, as so therefore unconsciously displays it fully to everyone through constant
bad behavior, as if asking to be 'counseled'. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:49 PM
oh please. the discourse is dominated by blog/News junkies that do nothing more than regurgitate other people's words. you have a handful of self-important failures looking to carve out an identity by clutching to some political stereotype. and below that you have the alt.news weirdos salivating over the conspiracy of the month.
to treat this with an ounce of respect would be patronizing. I'm sure that is what most people want and that seems to me to be sad and desperate. better to be honest about my disdain and enjoy the moronic spectacle for what it is. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:51 PMThat's it, get down in the arena yourself, Senator...
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:59 PM"oh please. the discourse is dominated by blog/News junkies that do nothing more than regurgitate other people's words."
I agree. I hate that crap. Unless it really is to the point, or has some real quirks to talk about or socially negotiate,
I don't find it much worth my while. Why read some long post served up by someone who can't summon the
thoughtful words to defend it? Besides, my OP implies I highly dislike how that is all that ever goes on around here.
Compared to every other tribe on tribe !* Politics *! is sucking down a huge wad of bandwidth, while only
practising regurgitation. I tend to fall out of the nest before opening my mouth to that momma.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:56 PM
nope. laziness holds people back. and ignorance and hostility. so fuck it. the moron in a Trailblazer tailgating the old lady in the slow lane... you know the guy with the pissing Calvin. or the moron with the Raider's decal ready to pull a gun because someone beat him out of a parking space. or the impulsive moron that feels entitled to a bailout after betting it all on a house thinking that he was only going to own for a couple years and sell because the price of real estate always goes up...
the world is full of that. and then there are smart people that bust their asses to learn and be better. they matter. morons don't.
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:43 PM
Wormwhole says, "That's why we have to share what's here"
Under the capitalism of the Democrats and Republicans representing the ruling rich will not only not share what the have stolen out of our labor, they will take 700 billion in the taxes for the economic crisis that flowed naturally from their system, to line their pockets, and they will take trillions more in windfall profits from the wars they created. Parasites. Period.
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:30 PM"Many left-leaning Americans were fooled by Leninist socialism, :"
Strange coincidence that you should mention that......I just started reading this book:
www.nysun.com/arts/banish...iadis/82839/
Really good so far...... -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:36 PM
Stalin betrayed the Russian Revolution.
Socialism has yet to be tried. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:43 PMStalin wasn't really the first. Russia is a big place to try such. It tends to devolve into
Empire again, in so many ways. Things were supposed to change. Leave the empire-
building to the ancients. We need democracy, civility and a break from worldwide unrest.
And enough caring to get it done. Remove the stumbling-blocks...
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:49 PM"Stalin betrayed the Russian Revolution. "
yeah, it's always someone's fault that socialism ends up not working. thanks for that, Steven. You should read this if you haven't already:
books.google.com/books
It's really good. Not anti communist propaganda......just a history of the revolution. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:57 PM
"yeah, it's always someone's fault that socialism ends up not working."
Capitalism has always been the biggest failure in the world.
As for socialism not working, like I said, it has never been tried. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:05 PM"As for socialism not working, like I said, it has never been tried. "
Sigh. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:11 PM
"Sigh"
That's not a response. Socialism has never been tried.
Socialism must overthrow capitalism, and, for the workers to rule as advocated by Marx, it must be democratic. This has never been tried.
lists.riseup.net/www/info/...ation_news -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:15 PMSteven, many European countries have a combo democratic-capitalist-socialist set up.
We just have to fashion one that works for us. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:20 PMWell, I'm turning in soon. All I have to say is, quit emphasizing the negative.
If you do only that, that is the only thing you will discuss. I'll check back in
tomorrow. Thanks to all for the contributions. Feel free to steer this towards
positive, issue-related discussion. Perhaps it would be beneficial to discuss
just what the two parties stand for these days, and how their platforms should
be realized to the public. Enough soundbytes and culture-warring. Figure out
where people stand for legitimate reasons, them work on seeing each other's
perspective. Between those is the middle ground. Use it.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:29 PM
"Steven, many European countries have a combo democratic-capitalist-socialist set up."
"capitalist-socialist" is a contradiction in terms
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:18 PM"Socialism must overthrow capitalism, and, for the workers to rule as advocated by Marx, it must be democratic. This has never been tried. "
Sigh. You're hanging on to a pipe dream.......You can say that socialism has never been tried, and you might be right. Maybe the kind that Marx wrote about has never been really put in to place. But governments HAVE tried, and once you get past the theory of it....put into practice it's horrible. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:21 PM>> You can say that socialism has never been tried, and you might be right. <<
yeah. human nature just keeps fucking up all the experiments. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:24 PM"yeah. human nature just keeps fucking up all the experiments. "
And how!!!!
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 11:32 PM
"yeah. human nature just keeps fucking up all the experiments."
Every so-called socialist revolution has been led by Stalinist parties under the Stalinist model. It is Stalinism and capitalism that has fucked-up, not "human nature" and socialism. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 2:36 PMcapitalist/socialist as whole government format is certainly contradictory, but again, even the USA is technically a socialist corporatist oligarchy.
Its too bad steven that you can't seem to understand the basics of poli sci and why this is so.
Its also too bad that wormhole charlies great attempt for a positive dialogue got so little traction.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 2:44 PM
prom writes, "even the USA is technically a socialist corporatist oligarchy."
In the U.S. the capitalist class controls the economy and the government, at its core the police, courts, prisons, and military. The U.S. is a capitalist country, period.
There is nothing socialist about the United States.
And all capitalist countries are "corporatist" oligarchies.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:32 PM"In the U.S. the capitalist class controls the economy and the government,
at its core the police, courts, prisons, and military. The U.S. is a capitalist country, period."
Steven, be thankful there *are* courts, some countries don't have them.
Wait, I'm being told we are circumventing that obligation to our citizens in
favor of 'extraordinary rendition'.
I've read a few histories of communist Russia and I see little difference,
just a more dehumanized version. Here it's about absorbing wealth from
the proles through legal means, there is was about 'Brazil'-like hierarchies
that became tyrants between the people and their common values.
Don't make me quote Kafka or something. I read a biography of a female
poet who was put in the prison system just for her viewpoint, and disseminating
'radical' political tracts, when in all truth it was just literature (which may have had
some submerged antagonisms). The black market in CCCR became the only means
to get anything done. In many ways the CEO's here making the giant sucking sound
are doing the same thing but after a different manner. Can't take out the bottom of
the pyramid without some dire consequences. Look at Russia in the 90's.
Look at all the instant deregulated billionaires. It's basically the same thing here. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:34 PMWhat should you response be to these tactics?
Consume far, far less.... of everything you can.
Diversify. Be self-contained. But don't encourage
violence. Divide and Conquer, said Machiavelli.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 11:10 PM
"Steven, be thankful there *are* courts, some countries don't have them."
I am not thankful for American courts. They are perpetrators of vast injustices. From the mass incarceration of the poor with around a million people in prison, to racist and political frame-ups, there is no justice in America's capitalist courts.
And you are correct that there generally is no real justice under Stalinist regimes, but on that issue those societies really didn't change from the feudal, capitalist, fascist, and U.S. backed dictatorships that those various Stalinist led revolutions overthrew. Actual socialism, which Stalinism is not, is based on the democratic control of the majority over the government and economy. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Mon, September 29, 2008 - 3:07 AMI am not thankful for American courts.
-----------
me neither
-------------
They are perpetrators of vast injustices.
------------
thats understating it.
----------
From the mass incarceration of the poor with around a million people in prison, to racist and political frame-ups, there is no justice in America's capitalist courts.
-------------
unless you have the money to afford the Lawyers, in which case justice can be bought in most cases.
----------------
And you are correct that there generally is no real justice under Stalinist regimes, but on that issue those societies really didn't change from the feudal, capitalist, fascist, and U.S. backed dictatorships that those various Stalinist led revolutions overthrew. Actual socialism, which Stalinism is not, is based on the democratic control of the majority over the government and economy.
-------------
Actual socialism is two slightly different but highly related things.
1. Any situation in which the government puts its hand into or doles out money.
A. IE, Taxes, Public roads, Public utilities, School, and mass transit are all things for instance which we have integrated some amount
of socialism into. In such cases socialism is one aspect of a more complicated larger system, with elements of other forms of government combined. The USA governments ACTUAL current government is by definition plutocracy, oligarchy, capitalism, and socialism
via the government relationship with corporate entities. Realize that the government affords corporations not only personhood rights, but other rights individuals are not afforded. The governments current relationship with corporations, eps oil, petroleum, logging, and mining rights is entirely socialist.
2. A whole system of government based on the aforementioned principle; which
A has never been tried and
B; Is theoretically impossible, because it fails the test of systems theory, it can't hold a society together and must always decay very rapidly
into some form of fascism.
Now, I guess it must be time for the basic basic stuff i shouldn't have to go grab from wikipedia.
Forms of government
Part of the Politics series
List of forms of government
* Anarchism
* Aristocracy
* Authoritarianism
* Autocracy
* Communist state
* Corporatocracy
* Democracy
Direct democracy
Representative democracy
* Despotism
* Dictatorship
Military dictatorship
* Feudalism
* Kritocracy
* Logocracy
* Meritocracy
* Minarchism
* Mobocracy
* Monarchy
Absolute monarchy
Constitutional monarchy
* Night watchman state
* Noocracy
* Ochlocracy
* Oligarchy
* Omniarchy
* Plutocracy
* Republic
Mixed government
Constitutional republic
Parliamentary republic
Socialist republic
Capitalist republic
* Socialism
* Stratocracy
* Technocracy
* Theocracy
* Theodemocracy
* Timocracy
* Totalitarianism
* Tribe
Chiefdom
Before we go any further, steven, you need to read up on your poli sci, because you don't realize how bad you are emberassing yourself.
Everybody with brains understands that pure form socialism is a juvenile fantasy and why. So go look the rest up on your own and don't make me drive home the point of how stupid you are being about this by posting the entire rest of it.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Mon, September 29, 2008 - 3:09 AMAttributes of government
Beyond official typologies it is important to think about regime types by looking at the general attributes of the forms of government [2]:
* Traditional/premodern (clan/kinship-based, chiefdom) or modern (bureaucracies)
* Personalistic or impersonal
* Autocracy (totalitarianism or authoritarianism), oligarchy, or democracy
* Elective or hereditary
* Direct or indirect elections (United States Electoral College)
* Secular, state religion with religious toleration, theocratic
* Republic or monarchy
* Constitutional monarchy or absolute monarchy
* Majority government or coalition government
* Single-member district or proportional representation
* Party system: Non-partisan, single-party; dominant-party; two-party; multi-party
* Separation of powers (executive, legislative, or judicial) or no separation of powers
* Parliamentary, presidential, or semi-presidential
* Single or multiple executive (Switzerland has seven executives of the Swiss Federal Council, France has a dual executive of the Prime Minister and President; the United States has a single executive, the President)
* Composition of the legislative power (rubber stamp or active)
* Unicameralism or bicameralism (much more rarely, tricameralism and tetracameralism)
* Number of coalitions or party-appointed legislators in assemblies
* Confederation, federation, or unitary
* Voting system:
o Plurality ("first past the post")
o Majoritarian (50 percent plus one), including two-round (runoff) elections
o Supermajoritarian (from 55 to 75 percent) - Senate cloture rules, entrenched clauses, absolute majorities
o Unanimity - (100 percent) - corporate governance for board of directors
* Type of economic system
* Prevalent ideologies and cultures
* Strong institutional capacity or weak capacity
* Legitimate or illegitimate (Communist Romania)
* De facto (effective control) or De jure (nominal control) of government
* Sovereign, semi-sovereign, not sovereign
* Racial segregation (Rhodesia) or desegregation
[edit] Other empirical and conceptual problems
On the surface, identifying a form of government appears to be easy. Most would say that the United States is a democratic republic while the former Soviet Union was a totalitarian state. However, as Kopstein and Lichbach (2005:4) argue, defining regimes is tricky. Defining a form of government is especially problematic when trying to identify those elements that are essential to that form. There appears to be a disparity between being able to identify a form of government and identifying the necessary characteristics of that form. For example, in trying to identify the essential characteristics of a democracy, one might say "elections." However, both citizens of the former Soviet Union and citizens of the United States voted for candidates to public office in their respective states. The problem with such a comparison is that most people are not likely to accept it because it does not comport with their sense of reality. Since most people are not going to accept an evaluation that makes the former Soviet Union as democratic as the United States, the usefulness of the concept is undermined. In political science, it has long been a goal to create a typology or taxonomy of polities, as typologies of political systems are not obvious [3]. It is especially important in the political science fields of comparative politics and international relations. One important example of a book which attempts to do so is Robert Dahl's Polyarchy (Yale University Press (1971)).
One approach is to further elaborate on the nature of the characteristics found within each regime. In the example of the US and the Soviet Union, both did conduct elections, and yet one important difference between these two regimes is that the USSR had a single-party system, with all other parties being outlawed. In contrast, the United States effectively has a bipartisan system with political parties being regulated, but not forbidden. A system generally seen as a representative democracy (for instance Canada, India and the United States) may also include measures providing for: a degree of direct democracy in the form of referendums and for deliberative democracy in the form of the extensive processes required for constitutional amendment.
Another complication is that a number of political systems originate as socio-economic movements and are then carried into governments by specific parties naming themselves after those movements. Experience with those movements in power, and the strong ties they may have to particular forms of government, can cause them to be considered as forms of government in themselves. Some examples are as follows:
* Perhaps the most widely cited example of such a phenomenon is the communist movement. This is an example of where the resulting political systems may diverge from the original socio-economic ideologies from which they developed. This may mean that adherents of the ideologies are actually opposed to the political systems commonly associated with them. For example, activists describing themselves as Trotskyists or communists are often opposed to the communist states of the 20th century.
* Islamism is also often included on a list of movements that have deep implications for the form of government. Indeed, many nations in the Islamic world use the term Islamic in the name of the state. However, these governments in practice exploit a range of different mechanisms of power (for example debt and appeals to nationalism). This means that there is no single form of government that could be described as “Islamic” government. Islam as a political movement is therefore better seen as a loose grouping of related political practices rather than a single, coherent political movement.
* The basic principles of many other popular movements have deep implications for the form of government those movements support and would introduce if they came to power. For example, bioregional democracy is a pillar of green politics.
[edit] See also
* Civics
* Comparative government
* List of countries by system of government
* List of forms of government
* List of European Union member states by political system
[edit] References
1. ^ assets.cambridge.org/052184/...erpt.pdf Kopstein and Lichbach, 2005
2. ^ Regime Types
3. ^ Lewellen, Ted C. Political Anthropology: An Introduction Third Edition. Praeger Publishers; 3rd edition (November 30, 2003)
[edit] Further reading -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Mon, September 29, 2008 - 11:07 PM>> * Traditional/premodern (clan/kinship-based, chiefdom) or modern (bureaucracies)
* Personalistic or impersonal
* Autocracy (totalitarianism or authoritarianism), oligarchy, or democracy <<
I see Scribbly is still rearranging his inner sock drawer. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Wed, October 1, 2008 - 3:00 PMright yoni. like these pairs?
----------------
18. Geothermal Power
a. Geothermal power is energy derived from the heat of the earth.
b. that heat is on average several miles beneath the surface.
c. However, there is a lot of variance in how deep that heat is, and every state has regions where that heat is within a few hundred meters of the surface.
d. Geothermal power like wind power becomes cheaper per materials cost the larger the plant is.
e. Geothermal power has very high potential yields, and is in fact competitive with nuclear power in terms of sheer yield.
f. Geothermal power plants could in theory be built with higher energy yields than nuclear power plants. However, this is not advised or advisable, due to
potential tectonic stresses such high energy plants could create.
g. in the range around 100th or even 1 tenth the yield energy of a nuclear power station, geothermal power stations could be built which would have
virtually no impact on tectonic stresses.
h. Tectonic stress is an important variable. Frequently geothermal power is most accessible along fault lines. However, these should be ignored for
caldera like situations where the system is not contributing or in danger due to tectonic stresses.
i. There are many different ways of configuring a geothermal power station, and only one which this author supports. This is called double circuit closed system geothermal power.
j. double circuit simply means that the water drops on one circuit and the steam comes up on the other.
k. closed circuit means that no water is ever lost in the system, because even the heating element chamber is a well engineered container
L. Geothermal power can in theory meet all of our energy needs
M. of the resources available to us, it does this with the cheapest over all cost, the smallest possible ecological footprint, and the highest level of
permanency.
N. Geothermal power is not a good solution in situations where a small amount of power is needed for small communities or remote estates. It has a high material cost and start up cost to drill the well.
O. Geothermal power is theoretically available almost everywhere on the surface of the earth.
P. current oil wells now go as deep as 7, 8, 9 miles deep.
Q. Enough Geothermal power is accessible within 200 meters depth to meet all of our energy needs.
R. where larger power sources are wanted in places where that heat is deeper, it is still true that geothermal heat in most places is not
deeper than 4 miles.
S. In some rare situations where the crust is thick, geothermal power might be as deep as 20 miles.
Don't drill there, import the energy from 150 miles away somewhere.
19. Hydrogen power;
a. Hydrogen power is an up and coming technology which we can expect to see having good strong applications 20 or 30 years from now.
b. Hydrogen power is very promising, but currently, its still mostly a way to store energy, not create it.
c. The two main exceptions to this are using corrosive rare earth metals to get reactions, and using phased electrical energy to short out the binding force.
d. The problem with the former is that the rare earth metal is itself a form of fuel, and that creating it, and "burning" it with water both create toxic
substances as side effects.
e. the problem with the latter is containment of the field and what happens when organic matter is exposed to high energy bursts of electricity.
f. To the knowledge of this author, water based solutions which continue to use a combustion engine are frauds.
g. When Hydrogen becomes a used technology, it will probably be for very large equipment and uses, such as trains, planes, and large boats
20. Hydrolic or Hydro Electric power.
a. This energy is created by damming a river and using falling water to drive a turbine.
b. this is incredibly damaging to the ecology.
c. Yields are fairly high per materials cost, but, still, hydro electric materials costs are comparable to geothermal power, which doesn't destroy an entire
ecosystem per power plant.
d. Hydro electric power does not exist in anywhere near sufficient quantities to meet all of our energy needs.
e. This author finds hydro-electric power to be a bad idea all the way around, not even as useful as nuclear power.
21. Nuclear power
a. Nuclear power (currently) is derived from using rare earth metals in reactions which turn some fraction of those fuels directly into energy.
b. The radioactive fuels must be mined, and this results currently in the deaths (and serious health problems) of many Miners.
c. Nuclear power currently creates hyper toxic and radio active wastes, which cost money to tend and babysit, and which in an accident
of ignorance 10 thousand years from now could wipe out an entire continents worth of our descendants.
d. Nuclear power is in many senses still a futuristic technology with much promise and much potential.
e. Thus nuclear power should be studied and refined in the laboratory.
f. The focus of such studies should be in finding ways to use non radioactive fuels,
finding ways to create dissipating forms of radiation only, and finding ways to eliminate the problem of wastes.
g. Nuclear power is very high yield, but it has exorbitant costs, especially over the long term.
h. Compared to Geothermal power, nuclear power is extremely expensive, gets more expensive instead of less expensive over time, is extremely
dangerous, and perhaps most importantly, sooner or later we will run out of nuclear fuels, and still be forced to move on to geothermal power.
i. Nuclear power will be most useful for purposes of exploring our solar system and our galaxy.
j. There is no good reason to use nuclear power for domestic use considering the other much better alternatives.
22. Zero point energy
a. Zero point energy is derived from quantum phase state fluctuations where energy is created in contradiction to the "laws" of conservation of mass and
energy.
b. Zero point energy is a futuristic technology which may become realistic within the next 100 years.
c. Final stage proof of concept zero point energy research should be conducted at least as distant from the earth as the oort cloud, due to the unforseeable
nature of potential dangers.
d. In theory, zero point energy could create a self sustaining quantum phase reaction which could create nearly unlimited energy in spaces literally too small to be seen by the naked eye.
e. Early stage research into zero point energy is the entire field of quantum mechanics, specifically Singularities, branes, and quantum holographics.
23. Summary of findings.
a. Geothermal, Solar, Wind, Tidal, and Hydrogen Technologies together provide a clear and easy path towards green and sustainable energy.
b. Geothermal energy specifically is the solution which a realistic green energy infrastructure should be rooted in.
c. It is reasonable to project a total holistic solution in which 80 percent of our energy comes from geothermal, 10 percent from Solar, 5 percent from
Wind, and 5 percent from Tidal.
d. It is also worth mentioning that electric cars are a current and viable technology.
e. This is all of it simply a sumary of known and provable science fact. The only reason why most people don't know all of this is that oil companies
and rich evil jerks have spent billions of dollars to flood the public with propaganda and misinformation.
f. The other strategy of the evil empire jerks is to promote energy resources such as biofuels or nuclear power which create a situation of extreme expense so that they can continue to exploit our need for energy in order to make money. A Geothermally based energy infrastructure would provide
extremely cheap energy (especially over the long term) and this would be the death of the energy industry.
_________________
The opposite of bravery is not cowardice but conformity.
Where is it written that all of our dreams must be small ones? -B5-
"Theres a place out beyond right and wrong; I'll meet you there" RUMI
prometheuspan
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined:
Sat 24 May, 2008 17:44
Posts: 2548
thefraserdomain.typepad.com/ener ... teste.html
www.gordonmoyes.com/2007/01/10/c ... n-nuclear/
www.answers.com/topic/geothermal ... technology
www.greentechmedia.com/articles/ ... r-918.html
www.technologyreview.com/Energy/17236/
solveclimate.com/blog/20080227/g ... dant-cheap
www.altenergystocks.com/archives ... power.html
peakenergy.blogspot.com/2008/05/ ... power.html
seekingalpha.com/article/76811-g ... ources-101
www.smu.edu/geothermal/2...2004NAmap.htm
www1.eere.energy.gov/geother...map.html
geoheat.oit.edu/images/usmap1.gif
pesn.com/2007/01/22/9500449_MIT_ ... 4_hj70.jpg
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... map_US.png
thefraserdomain.typepad.com/ener ... es_map.gif
www.utpb.edu/ceed/renewableenerg ... rmal_1.jpg
images.google.com/imgres ... l%26sa%3DN
New Tectonic Source of Geothermal Energy?
volcan42.jpg Geochemists from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Arizona State University have discovered a new tool for identifying potential geothermal energy resources. The discovery came from comparing helium isotopes in samples gathered from wells, springs, and vents across the northern Basin and Range of western North America. High helium ratios are common in volcanic regions. When the investigators found high ratios in places far from volcanism, they knew that hot fluids must be permeating Earth's inner layers by other means. The samples collected on the surface gave the researchers a window into the structure of the rocks far below, with no need to drill.
"A good geothermal energy source has three basic requirements: a high thermal gradient—which means accessible hot rock—plus a rechargeable reservoir fluid, usually water, and finally, deep permeable pathways for the fluid to circulate through the hot rock," says Mack Kennedy. "We believe we have found a way to map and quantify zones of permeability deep in the lower crust that result not from volcanic activity but from tectonic activity, the movement of pieces of the Earth's crust."
Geothermal is considered by many to be the best renewable energy source besides solar. Accessible geothermal energy in the United States, excluding Alaska and Hawaii, is estimated at 90 quadrillion kilowatt-hours, 3,000 times more than the country's total annual energy consumption. Determining helium ratios from surface measurements is a practical way to locate promising sources.
Julia Whitty is Mother Jones' environmental correspondent. You can read from her new book, The Fragile Edge, and other writings, here.
1. What happened to our economy?
Several things. I will try to go in the order in which i think these things are the most influential.
A. The War In Iraq. Trillions of Dollars we won't be spending on anything constructive. The big hole in the leaky boat.
Every Dollar we spend on war is a dollar not spent on sustainability, stable economy, healthcare, education, or etc.
B. The Corporate Oligarchy. Our economy has actually been very abused for nearly 100 years by the Ultra-rich, who seem to think that
our national economy should be their personal play pen. Trickle down economics are voodoo economics and do not work. When you take
economic pressure off of the rich, those pressures just end up falling to the middle class and the poor. What happened to the economy is that the
Ultra-rich gutted America to make themselves richer at the expense of the rest of us. Its STILL working for THEM.
They are getting rich. Fortune 500 companies are still doing just fine. Its the middle Class and the poor who are suffering.
This effect by itself was somewhat balanced in the economy of the Clinton era. Clinton is not my favorite guy, but he did balance the budget.
Bush on the other hand in every way, shape, and form, increased federal spending, decreased spending on the middle class and the poor,
and consolidated power and money in the hands of the Rich. Our economy tanked because of TRICKLE UP. They robbed most of America, and
that effect is now being felt by even those who did the robbing.
C. Global Dependency. Something easy to miss unless you are a systems theorist. The most stable systems are those which are self sufficient redundantly. The best way to run the country is with each state and each city doing all it can to be self sufficient. That way when there is stress in onw place, it does not carry to elsewhere, and if one part of the system breaks down, other areas can help to compensate. The corporate oligarchy
has intentionally reversed this simple wisdom as part of their agenda to promote and sustain poverty. By keeping us dependent on the global economy, we can't say no to the terms and conditions that they impose.
D. Automatically disvaluing currency. Its easy to read the constitution and to see that it says that the governments of the states are responsible to print their own currencies. What we have is a system in blatant violation of the constitution which gives the power to print money over to a private corporation. The fed bank is no more a federal agency than fed ex. The problem is very simple. They print the money, and the USA buys it, on credit, with interest. Every day we go into more debt over the currency itself, in a vicious circle. Clearly, the long term effect of this is that the money being printed ends up having less and less value. Thats market wisdom trying to tell us to put the Fed Bank out of our collective misery.
E. Corporations leaving the USA... well, makes sense, they are done looting it. The main reason why they leave is simply that they are
looking for new governments to loot. USA citizenry is starting to wise up, and al lof the money has already been drained. They sucked out our blood,
and you can't get more blood from a dry corpse thats been flocked on by vampires.
Avoiding taxes is one small peice of a larger issue; a Big Corporation can BE ITS OWN GOVERNMENT in third world countries. They don't have to
pay taxes, they don't have to deal with unions, they don't have to pay a living wage, they don't have to keep humane working conditions... Its a long list. Low wage markets is just another thing on that list.
So our economy tanked for these main reasons;
1. The Iraq war
2. Old systemic failures which are still present right now, ie; Corporate Oligarchy.
3. The money system itself is inherently flawed for the purpose of making bankers rich.
At the expense of the poor over the short term, and at the expense of the whole economy long term.
4. Corporations are leaving the USA for more fertile grazing lands.
5. We keep buying stuff from overseas, rather than make it ourselves.
Each of these issues here is vastly over simplified and many details coudl be put on these basics.
I have only about the equivalent of a Bachelors in Economics, So i should confess that i'm no Expert.
(On the other hand, i'd do better at running the economy than the bushies have... but then i do know my systems theory.)
I hope that answers these questions to the satisfaction of those asking them, and that they will join us here in exploring these and other issues.
Thanks!
:mrorange:
_________________
THE COMING ECONOMIC MELTDOWN
topic posted Today, 12:17 AM by offlineprometheusPAN delete entire topic
*
For well over 50 years the USA has run its economy based on assorted forms of debt bubbles and ephemeral "trading". The top 10 percent make their money not by doing anything valuable for the economy, but by being parasites on wall street. The housing bubbles, the mortgage bubbles, the loan bubbles, the banking bubbles, all are phantasms created out of thin air by waving a magic wand.
What had to happen sooner or later is for those bubbles to pop. Thanks to the bush admin, too many of those bubbles have now popped nearly simultaneously, and the house of cards is going to fall. It will happen in excruciating slow motion, like a train wreck; rail car after rail car
being hopped off the tracks. But it will happen, and there is little or nothing that can now be done to stop it.
The domino effect has begun. With misery and trickle up, the great financial institutions which saw the little guy as the sucker are now being brought down by the millions of defaulted littled guys who have lost it all- or almost all.
This trend will not stop and it will not let up just because the fed bails them out. In fact the USA government is itself just one more financial institution which must fail because it too is based on bubbles.
There is really only one chance to avoid something much worse than the great depression, and that is to do the following things,
immediately;
1. Transform over to a geothermal/solar/wind centered energy economy.
2. Begin localization of resource creation and use
3. Begin permaculturing our communities
4. Invest in a genuine green energy mass transit program
5. RE-regulate the assorted economic institutions.
6. make taxes FAIR rather than insanely slanted to favor the rich.
If these solutions are not employed, (along with other more minor solutions) Then cause and effect and systemic law dictates that the economy MUST fail, and in a way that will force us to rename the "Great depression" the 'lesser depression."
As long as you folks stay over here where the answers are not put in front of you, all you can do is at best be witnesses to this as it happens, and eventually, tribe will fail and the record of your assorted conversations will disintegrate into the ethers.
Unless we start investing right now in real solutions, real problem solving process, and a community created for the purpose of paradigmal revolution, all you are doing is spinning your wheels while rome catches fire.
It will take a long tiem for that fire to spread and catch, but it will, and eventually there will be no way to stop it from burning out civilization to the ground.
Gas is not going to get cheaper, its going up because we have already hit peak oil. The earth only has so much oil in it and we have taken out of it more than half of what it has to offer. Simultaneously, emerging economies are competing for that oil, and so that means that there is even less of it to go around.
If you think things are bad now, what will they be like in 2 years when gas is 15 dollars / gallon? How much will you pay for a loaf of bread
when transporting it to the grocery store costs three times more than it does now?
The USA is about to fail spectacularly, just as Russia did while reagan was in office. And due in no small part to reagan and other republicans.
If you cannot be wise enough to help me stop this from happening, then at least i owe it to you all to warn you to stock up a years worth of food and water.
There is in theory still just enough time to prevent this from happening if we can actually band together and be problem solvers rather than chit chatters. Having made such a pitch before, I can only assume it won't work this time either, but, at least I will have the grim satisfaction of knowing i did all that I personally could for you all; even tho you all really didn't do much of anything to help me.
_________________
Again, but since it is important.
No bailout of the banks can do anything to stop the economy from crashing. All it can do is slow
or postpone that crash.
To think of it another way, think of it as an infinite entropy hot potato. Now we cover up the hot potato with a nice shiny shell, one of those clam shells. And we whoosh the hot potato around on the table underneath those shells until nobody can tell where the hot potato is. So people go back to business and etc, saying to themselves "there is no hot potato." Which is actually just about as insane as it gets.
The hot potato is still on the table, its just being re-arranged. All that is going on is a shell game in which the location of the hot potato becomes in question. In this particular case, we know exactly where the hot potato actually ends up tho- sucking more taxes out of the American people, IE; the hot potato ends up being a weight around the neck of the common man/woman.
And that is a problem because the original hot potato was bad enough, but as we moved this hot potato around and robbed peter to pay paul, the hot potato actually grew in size because
we are bailing out the evil chimps rather than letting them fall.
At best, this postpones the hard crash till after the election. At worst, it postpones it a week or three and then the hot potato gets so hot it burns through the shell.
(Not to mention so big that the shell can no longer stay flush to the table.)
The root problem is deregulation which allowed the drift of rich getting richer and poor getting poorer to shift at a new multiple of the old rate. for the sake of argument, lets call it 100 times
more. So the rich got richer 100 times faster and more frequently and the poor got poorer 100 times faster and more quickly, because the entire banking establishments fundamental purpose of being a vehicle by which to transfer money from poor to rich was no longer controlled or regulated. Evil does what it can get away with, and, thanks to bush deregulation, it could get away with murder.
This leaves 10 million or 50 million Americans recently slid over the red line from middle class into poverty. And with that much drag coeficient on the economy, and with no more blood left
to suck, the vampire institutions are failing, which is actually a good thing, because all they ever were was vampires to begin with.
We should let them fail. We most certainly should not give the president unilateral power to take our tax money and toss it away to banks, without any oversight, without court process,
or etc. (The wording of the current bailout bill says that nobody gets any power at all in this other than the president.)
I subscribe to "Newsmax" which is a fundie ponzi scheme news outlet for republican suckers.
Its a way to keep a finger on the pulse of the insane crap that these people create in order to
have their insane delusional version of reality.
What is interesting here is that as usual, they mix a lot of truth in with their corrupt and evil
games. In this case, they are trying to make money off of scaring their subscribers shitless.
Which is pretty much all the republicans do anyways; scare you and then offer you an elephant gun so you can go shoot bunnies.
_________________ -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Thu, October 16, 2008 - 4:37 AMso, steven? you ready to grow up yet?
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, October 17, 2008 - 10:32 AMokay, bumpin again for steven.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:23 PM"Its also too bad that wormhole charlies great attempt for a positive dialogue got so little traction."
Want I should resurrect that feeling?
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:35 PM
>> It is Stalinism and capitalism that has fucked-up, not "human nature" and socialism. <<
the same argument could be made that we've never had true capitalism. we all know that you'll never be satisfied with the results until you get an outcome you like. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:50 PMWhat do you mean by true capitalism?
Define the term, please. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 4:54 PM>> What do you mean by true capitalism? <<
the absence of government control/intervention in the daily operations of business and industry. it is nice to ponder it in theory, but it will never exist. just as true socialism, completely dependent upon some nonexistent sense of brotherhood of man will never exist.
and that is the painful reality that types like Steven will never accept. every time you move from theory to applied you need to factor in the inherent nature of man. and when you vest that much intrusive power into the hands of a single entity, someone eventually will exploit it and ruin it. plain old common sense. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:04 PMWhat do you feel is the inherent nature of man? And back that up, please.
I'm imagining you mean giving into one's weaknesses, like greed, gluttony and such.
IOW, wanting everything for oneself. Yes I do see many that operate in that manner,
but it is not the inherent nature of man.
And regulation is needed, unless you alwys want hyperinflation on the most basic
commodities, like food, energy, or clothing. I know how cheaply the clothing is made
in those southeast-asian countries, how those women are worked to death for pennies.
If you want to go back to complete tribal warfare with swords and knives, just say so.
I liked that. Manly. But I think you like the scurrilousness of the 'market'. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:15 PM
I'll go down this rabbit hole only so far. so I'll point out the obvious and if that isn't good enough for you I can live with that.
all you need do is look to the prison system, the prison guard unions, the longshoremen union to find complete self-interest exploiting this pretense of solidarity. power is vested in the hands of people and people use it to their advantage.
how many good looking women do you know will refuse a free drink or any of the benefits that go along with being attractive? how many physically intimidating men are going to back down from a confrontation when they know they are in the wrong? understand? at every level of our existence we exploit our advantages and fall into a pecking order whether it is a soulless fraternity or an art collective. and socialism inevitably fails because inevitably, the hierarchy will form. people with more power will like that power and use that power to ensure they stay in power. then the collective advantages intended for all will start to be less fairly distributed and the distortions will begin to undermine everything. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:17 PMDUDE, I've been working in a prison! SHIT YOU NOT! -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:22 PMShall I tell you about the felons' cells?
Well, many have the obligatory pin-up pages,
some have the calendars with the big X's in them,
some have the whole walls *covered* with bible verses.
And those guys are no men to mess with.
I'm remembering something I told to Seth at one point...
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:20 PMTell me who desires the 'pecking order'?
I think Prometheus might have a classification for that.
Comes down to the reptilian brain, or something.
Where is Jonny/Greg, I need a real troll to feed on. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:25 PM>> Tell me who desires the 'pecking order'? <<
tell me why common sense needs to be explained.
>> Where is Jonny/Greg, I need a real troll to feed on. <<
* rolls eyes * I hope you're in your twenties. god forbid you're 30+ posting that kind of crap. if so it's time for the dungeon master to put down his twenty-sided die. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:41 PMpecking orders are for animals. Are you a hen clucking in the farmyard?
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:23 PM"soulless fraternity"
please describe further.
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:24 PMPeople in power refuse humility, and overindulge in greed.
That is why they inevitably become corrupted. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:26 PM>> That is why they inevitably become corrupted. <<
and if lightning strikes and you came to power, somehow you'd be immune to this? please. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:42 PMI just told you that I don't want power. Democracy, remember?
Our nation was founded upon it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:44 PMI swear the local trolls are like moths to the flame.
I guess that is a different manner of trying to argue over who
gets to be top dog in the top five moderators.
I'm a roamer like you guys though.
I only moderate when I feel like it. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:46 PMJeff must be next, followed closely by Cliff.
I guess we can have sessions on the weekends, guys.
Hope that makes you feel special. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:50 PMMaybe I'll post the entirety of that thread with Jeff now for laughs...
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 7:49 PMYoni says:
"people with more power will like that power and use that power to ensure they stay in power. then the collective advantages intended for all will start to be less fairly distributed and the distortions will begin to undermine everything."
I've seen it. It happens all the time. It starts in pre-school. Probably related to some kind of survival instinct. Kittens or puppies nursing, sometimes they try to push the other one off a nipple, so that they can have their food, now. Many nursing animals do that. The runt of the litter remains the runt, unless it dies, or gets extra mean. Never mind the fact that if they took turns, they would all get full and not waste energy on fighting each other.
Birds, they all appear at once to fight over the seed at the same time, waste energy trying to prove who is the biggest and the baddest to glut-out on the food. Then they all disappear at the same time, leaving a big dish of plenty food.
That hierarchy can cut down on future fighting. One dominance is established, the group can act to preserve the hierarchy, and there are positive advantages to having a group with a leader. In nature, a strong leader insures good genetics. In that a physically strong mate may pass on those big muscle genes, making the children stronger too.
People are just animals. Really. We evolved from the primordial ooze that everything else did.
Squirrels tuck away food for the future. Many other animals do it too. Bury a bone. Birds that hide food. So do people, they squirrel away resources for the future. But how many resources are really necessary? Millions of dollars for one person's job is silly considering that many others can barely survive. It's tragic, really.
But it is NOT true that all people exploit power. Power does make some uncomfortable. I've been both pretty and homely. I did not like the reactions of people when I was prettier. At all. I don't like the attention. I don't like being singled out for preferential treatment based on something as trivial and fleeting as the physical appearance.
I do believe in specializing. I do believe that people can work better in a group where there are many leaders...of different things. Someone who excels at mechanical things should be in charge of mechanical things. Duh. Not me. No matter what I look like. Or what my background is. Or which political party I might side with. It's the person who knows the most and can do the best job.
There are people for every kind of job. People that can do a good job in that field. Every job is crucial. If the business HAS business, the workers are providing a service for whomever uses/frequents that business. The workers have value. And the top leader of any business is completely worthless without those workers.
---
Memphis, 1968, Sanitation Workers Strike:
www.afscme.org/about/1548.cfm
Wednesday, Feb. 14 - The Mayor delivers a back-to-work ultimatum for 7 a.m. Feb. 15. Police escort the few garbage trucks in operation. Negotiations between the city and the union break off. Newspapers say more than 10,000 tons of garbage is piled up.
---
Oakland, 2002, Dock Workers Lockout:
dbacon.igc.org/Unions/21Lockout.htm
The lockout leaves millions of dollars in cargo sitting on docks up and down the west coast, or on ships motionless at anchor. Some, like the two huge freighters sitting at the Oakland Hanjin wharf, are only partially unloaded. The spanking-new terminal here just began operations a few months ago. Its ten container cranes, some of the world's largest, were the celebration of the San Francisco waterfront when they sailed under the Golden Gate Bridge into the bay, delicately carried on specially-built ships across the Pacific from China. Now the cranes stand like huge still birds with beaks in the air, oblivious to the ships below stacked with the containers they were meant to handle.
---
It doesn't matter at that point who has what power. Or how greedy they are. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, comes to a virtual standstill. Yes, it can be used to advantage, which is what you say. To get MORE than the fair share.
I would guess that most people are not all that happy or satisfied. With the "grass always greener" in someone's yard, not their own. More money, more products to buy, bigger houses, fancier cars, more shoes.
What if people were satisfied with what they have right now?
I don't mean homeless people or starving people or sickly people. I mean people that have a job which pays the bills to provide food, water, shelter, clothing, the basic needs. To live simply is easier. To use what you have for as long as it works is a good thing.
Animals are supposed to be less intelligent and act more on instinct than we humans are. But they can be trained to get along.
urbanlegends.about.com/librar...ets.htm
Why can't we do that? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 11:34 PMI think you have something there. I'm excerpting it so that people can more easily find it.
------------
Thanks. Amusing video, i managed to watch almost 20 seconds of it.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 11:42 PMWhy can't we do that?
-----------
Ego. ID. Animals don't have conflicts between themselves inside of their own psyches which they project at other people like NTs do.
Yoni, Cliff, And to a much lesser extent Mike C all get sucked into pack psychology games precisely because of projection of their own id.
Tigers may be killers, but it isn't about projecting an internal psychological conflict.
www.youtube.com/watch
www.youtube.com/watch
www.youtube.com/watch
www.youtube.com/watch -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 11:55 PM"Yoni, Cliff, And to a much lesser extent Mike C all get sucked into pack psychology games precisely because of projection of their own id."
Could you please stop playing that old harp, its strings have been broken for ages... -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 12:13 AMwould you care to be specific with your complaint? Which harp? Whats is your objection?
Do you think the point is wrong or do you just find the shots below the belt?
I'm working pretty hard for your thread here, Heres more info i just went and found since djarum asked.
tribes.tribe.net/conflictr...f76738d56f
"I'm keeping the other half reserved as a hedge. "
You certainly are the likable sort when your sense of humor kicks in.
lol
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 1:15 AMProm, I'm completely ensconced in troll mode right now.
At least you have humor receptors now. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 1:17 AMThe pack psychology bit. Dump it. This is a free-for-all.
If someone wants a current definition of anarchy, the Beast's name is ! * Politics * ! -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:06 AMProm, I'm completely ensconced in troll mode right now.
-----------
in that case, you know where to find me when the cheap thrills have left you feeling cheap.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:22 AMIt's not a cheap as it sometimes looks. Besides, I deliver asides here and there.
Seriously, I inject humor into everything I do, ruthlessly. And I really take to people
who do the same. Don't be so stodgy. -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:31 AM
Gosh, this has been one of the nicer threads. Most of the people are getting along.
Until this occurred
------------
my feelings exactly. I took you seriously charlie, and in return, I got pie faced.
Well, oaky dokey then, I'll try to keep in mind you are a clown.
----------
It's not a cheap as it sometimes looks.
-----------
You don't know what it looks like from my end.
---------
Besides, I deliver asides here and there.
-----------
Its always good to deliver a good aside.
----------
Seriously, I inject humor into everything I do, ruthlessly.
----------
I don't know why you are wasting your time here then, satans funhouse of playful sadism or mike Cs universal truth tribe
are beckoning...
-----------
And I really take to people
who do the same.
-----------
You and mike C then, fer sure, destined to be friends.
---------
Don't be so stodgy.
----------
I'm an idiot savante with 3 out of 8 types of intelligence in the 180 range, and 3 out of eight in the 90s. That includes on the low end interpersonal intelligence and, sadly, my sense of humor.
I'm vulcan. Sorry charlie, i can't help but be stodgy.
If you need a vulcan, you know where to find one.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:43 AMCan I trade you in for Loki? Will your feelings be hurt?
Honestly, I don't *want* to know what it looks like from your end...
I'm over here, remember? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:45 AMCan I trade you in for Loki? Will your feelings be hurt?
--------
Brainiac chaotic good klingons are hard to come by. Why would that bother me, hes at least got a sense of humor.?
---------
Honestly, I don't *want* to know what it looks like from your end...
-----------
Thats usually how it goes....
----------
I'm over here, remember?
-----------
how could i forget?
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:50 AMOK, you put on my face and I'll put on yours. Satisfied? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:52 AMno, confuzzled.
please proceed with your previously scheduled beehive pillaging, I'll just wander off and maybe come back to lurk.
thanks for the nice chat .... and the pie.
:)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:20 AMWormhole Charley says:
"This is a free-for-all."
It is? Are you sure? Have you looked at some of the older posts?
Gosh, this has been one of the nicer threads. Most of the people are getting along.
Until this occurred...
www.youtube.com/watch -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 2:26 AMOMG you hit the sweet spot!
When approaching the hive to steal honey, prepare fire to smoke 'em out harmlessly. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 3:24 AMWormhole Charley says:
"When approaching the hive to steal honey, prepare fire to smoke 'em out harmlessly."
What are you, Marlin Perkins?
It doesn't matter what the topic is, or where the discussion is held, people will still attack each other, like in the comments for the National Geographic video on a Leopard, Hyena, and Lioness here:
www.youtube.com/watch
LOL at "Hm, you sound like a Leopard fanboy to me... typical behaviour." Other than what they are talking about, the format is the same as it often is here..."I'm right, you're wrong." ... "No, I'm right, and you're an imbecile for ever thinking you could be right"
---
xxwhatevahxx (1 week ago)
Absolutely not, i love Leopards to.. but we cant escape the fact that a Prime Female Spotted Hyena can weigh up to around 210 LBS compared to a Leopards 140-190 LBS... and Hyenas have a BiteForce of up to 1200 LBS combined with BoneCrushing Teeth compared to a Leopards 500 LBS of biteforce... THATS A LOT OF DIFFERENCE... such a Matriarch would absolutely destroy any Leopard.
---
bigmonkeyman44 (1 week ago)
the leopard is stronger than a hyena and faster and smarter.....they can kill hyena....hyena is too slow to get a bite on a leopard.
---
xxwhatevahxx (1 week ago)
You have to be kidding right? Do you know how many Leopard deaths by Hyenas there is? You better open up your eyes and your Stubborness... Leopards are not stronger and smarter, but yes they are Faster.
Hm, you sound like a Leopard fanboy to me... typical behaviour. What you need to understand is that you shouldnt taking this like a SPORT... like "Mike Tyson vs Jack the Ripper" who would win?? Its stupid! These are Predators for gods sake! Two both very unique and beautiful predators.
---
bigmonkeyman44 (1 week ago)
I SWEAR TO FUCKIN GOD...YOU HAVE TO BE MENTALLY RETARDED IF YOU THINK A HYENA CAN KILL A ADULT LEOPARD....seriously shut the fuck up...the hyena doesnt have a stronger bite than a leopard.
---
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 11:54 PMJust the joke of the moment. I fully grant that the onion is not easy to peel...
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:17 PMThe tradition of the chivalric "knight in shining armor" can be traced back to the Arabs, with notable pre-Islamic figures like the Bedouin knight Antar The Lion (580 CE). He is believed to be the model of this tradition. [3] Charles Reginald Haines noted traits "such as loyalty, courtesy, munificence...are found in eminent degree among the Arabs." Medieval Spain, which he calls the "cradle of chivalry", could bear that pre-modern title, due to the direct impact of Arab civilization in al-Andalus. "Piety, courtesy, prowess in war, the gift of eloquence, the art of poetry, skill on horseback, dexterity with sword, lance, and bow" was expected of the elite Moorish knight. [4] Richard Francis Burton, when characterizing this strain of thought in the writings of Europe as a whole, maintained "were it not evident that the spiritualising of sexuality by imagination is universal among the highest orders of mankind", he continues, "I should attribute the origins of love to the influences of the Arabs' poetry and chivalry upon European ideas rather than to medieval Christianity." [5] The frequent clashes between the Christians and Muslims preceding the Christian Crusades leave no doubt that orders of the knighthood and the tradition of courtly love were transmitted into Europe by way of the Muslim occupation.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chivalry
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:44 PMTrue capitalism would be utilitarianism I suppose. It would be economics based on mutual use. Assigning a value on labor based on what each person is capable of and assigning a higher value on labor that has to be done and yet no one wants to do.
An understanding and use of utilitarianism, for instance, would easily solve Prom's problem with flooding and allow his message to be more palatable to the audience he is and isn't looking for. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:48 PM"An understanding and use of utilitarianism, for instance, would easily solve Prom's problem with flooding and allow his message to be more palatable to the audience he is and isn't looking for."
flooders.tribe.net/ -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:51 PMBack to the 'audience'. Who is the audience, and why do they heckle?
What are they heckling? Can they even see the performance for the overly-bright stage-lights? -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 5:57 PM<<<why do they heckle?>>>
Why look for one answer? -
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, September 27, 2008 - 6:01 PMWhy ask why? Try Bud Dry.
Butt-wipe-er. Ribbit!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:39 PMThis is how it should be, friends. Jason, thanks for being there... -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:41 PM
#
in response to: Re: Divided We Fail
Stalin betrayed the Russian Revolution.
Socialism has yet to be tried.
------------
absolutely true in one sense, and false in the other in that our own system of government IS corporate Socialism.
------ -
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:44 PM>> absolutely true in one sense, and false in the other in that our own system of government IS corporate Socialism. <<
I see complete idiocy managed to end the binary mindset.
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Fri, September 26, 2008 - 10:45 PM"This is a very sad book, the story of thousands of Americans who, during the Depression, lured by sham Soviet propaganda and pro-Soviet falsehoods spread by the likes of George Bernard Shaw and the corrupt New York Times Moscow correspondent, Walter Duranty, migrated to the USSR in search of jobs and a role in the "building of socialism." It was, in the words of the author, "the least heralded migration in American history" and a period when "for the first time in her short history more people were leaving the United States than were arriving." Most of these expatriates, not intellectuals but simple working men, were quickly disenchanted and wanted to return home, only to find that Moscow considered them Soviet citizens and barred them from leaving. Ignored by the American government, many of them ended in the gulag. In Tim Tzouliadis's "The Forsaken" (Penguin Press, 436 pages, $29.95), their dismal story is told with great skill and indignation usually missing from Western accounts of communist Russia."
"Basic needs first. For everyone. But through multiple
modalities: government, church, charities, so on. Once everyone's basic needs are met and
they are functioning members of society across the world, then the world as a whole can progress. "
I agree. Maslow and the modern pyramid of needs is a key and very important reality model for real problem solving.
mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewtopic.php
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sun, September 28, 2008 - 3:40 AMdivision can create instability
but it can also create stability
most division in the US has so far re-enforced the status quo
So I don't think being divided will cause us to fall as a nation really, there is a lot of crisis fear mongering going on about a crisis or many crisises converging on us at this time. They are real, but people being afraid and divided on the crisis only leaves the actual decision making to a few elites behind closed doors who have access to all of the details while outside those closed doors people bicker as to what the real details even are. The divisions will however serve the purpose of having only the tiniest minority of people with lots of money getting their way at the expense of everyone else in a democracy, consistently.
A midget can beat a two headed giant in a fight if he can just get the giant's two heads to argue violently and bash it's heads with the club until it falls unconscious, consider how this analogy is related to partisanship.
-
Re: Divided We Fail
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 9:53 AMt’s hard to not react to fear, so many things are posted on the internet that
when people react to it, it contributes to an increased atmosphere of hostility.
much of what some researchers here collect for others to look at simply
cannot be true, yet we fall into debate over it, causing division between us
when really what we need is to dispense with such fear mongering and find
solutions to our problems, whether they be social, political (internationally
or within our own countries), economical or otherwise. So I say be more creative,
being concerned constantly for how our contributions may affect those we argue
with, and making the best effort to speak from our knowledge, experience and
hearts, being aware of in which direction we want the future to go. A house divided
against itself cannot stand. -
-
Re: Together, apart - You Simply Fail, by Choice
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 10:57 AMSometimes acrimony is simpler even than fear; it can sometimes be traced to simple annoyance at insipidity, unwarranted arrogance, and/or repetitious insults.
Pretending that some rehabilitation of the Dem/Repub power structure offers promise seems utterly silly, to me. When someone suggests that my credibility rests on recognizing the right of aristocrats to rule, I find I lose respect for that person, and suddenly the abuses in their rhetoric that I've traditionally forgiven glare out and become persuasive.
It's depressing how effective the simple tactic of 'the manufactured negative' is on people who actually do perceive themselves as intellectual. Disney politics. Belief that Dem or Repub has any interest in rehabilitating the political machine is unsupportable. Belief that these political parties represent instrumentality that can be used to elevate American citizens is unsupportable.
Yet, shills for *power itself* seem drunk on condescension. I reject your views without a second thought. When you champion the elimination of freedom via false dichotomy, you declare yourself the enemy of human beings, and rely only on the fallacy of ridicule to justify it. You are the worst kind of dupe - self-satisfied, conceited, distracted by narcissism, freely lauding history's antagonists - apparently in the belief that you'll benefit somehow from the suppression of ethical governance. Shame on you, prometheus. -
-
Re: Together, apart - You Simply Fail, by Choice
Sat, October 18, 2008 - 7:10 PM
Rather than bore us both with a lot of patience and careful attempts at education, I'll just remember that you're hostile to ethical governance and,
---------
I'm not hostile to ethical governance, i'm hostile to things that don't work, mostly due to being fantasical retreats from reality.
If i had to pick an anarchist i like, it would be you. I've used you as the example caveat on a number of occasions now, in fact.
---------
despite all your talk, a pawn of the monarchs. Simple, pat, and nicely in-keeping with the hallowed platitudes of power.
----------
Thats about as much a leap as jason trying to tell me that post modernists are all worshippers of ignorant opinion.
The logic doesn't follow. Calling me a pawn of the monarchs is pretty silly, i'm the thorniest thing in their side, and its easy to see it.
----------
Slaves rankle under the watchful eyes of the unpaid trustees and struggle against the lies of propagandists. Why, prom: you're all three!
------------
No, i'm an educated pragmatic realist who knows that anarchy, like socialism, is a juvenile escapist fantasy that can't work.
-----------
WTG! Lying slave trustee propagandist - the death of children is your fault. Cause and effect.
-----------
Again, no, now you are just getting silly.
-----------
Try not alienating anarchists,
-----------
Its hard to do. Anarchism is an impossible and unworkable system. The only person who i ever met who was a self described anarchist
who also showed intelligence is you. Then we have people like Ron, or Brent, or Grim.
----------
and put down the absurd hauteur that serves as the apologia for your fellatio-oriented political views,
------------
Theres no hauter, just acute perspective, knowledge, and problem solving process, in the face of overhwhelmingly ignorant, lazy, and childish muggles.
--------
and MAYBE someday all those "real world solutions" you hallucinate might become incrementally less fantastic to consider.
---------
I'm not hallucinating, they are real world solutions. And your inability to consider them is mostly due to being an infotainment junkie.
Your spot on most of the time, but all of it goes to waste because like jason, you can't see the big picture and you have serious obsessions with false paradigms.
---------
Denigrating anarchism is an important tool for capitalists, aristocrats, and pawns of said. Why volunteer, prom? Shouldn't you get paid for propping up evil? Doing it for free seems obscene and hypocritical.
----------
You seem to make the assumption that anarchism has some redeeming value. It doesn't.
society will always require rules in order to keep people from dropping into pack psychology and animal instincts.
---------
[sharpens arrowheads and eyes the propagandist trustee with calm abiding
------------
this could get interesting.
----------
Pretending that some rehabilitation of the Dem/Repub power structure offers promise seems utterly silly, to me.
--------
I agree. So lets replace it with something even more fantastic which can't work.
(read; irony.)
------
When someone suggests that my credibility rests on recognizing the right of aristocrats to rule,
----------
Are you still talking to me or projecting past me or talking to somebody else, i got lost.
?
-----------
I find I lose respect for that person, and suddenly the abuses in their rhetoric that I've traditionally forgiven glare out and become persuasive.
-----------
Its probably time we work some through for you. I don't claim to be perfect, but i do know enough to know anarchy is a bogus political system hatched by juvenile delusionists who don't understand sociology 101.
--------
It's depressing how effective the simple tactic of 'the manufactured negative' is on people who actually do perceive themselves as intellectual.
-----------
Its amazing how people can get trapped inside of paradigms, and attached to them.
------------
Disney politics. Belief that Dem or Repub has any interest in rehabilitating the political machine is unsupportable. Belief that these political parties represent instrumentality that can be used to elevate American citizens is unsupportable.
----------
I agree. But what you seem to think the right course of action is is to beat people over the head with the bludgeon crafted from
your wit, your sharper than average mind, and your long practice against trolls.
-----------
Yet, shills for *power itself* seem drunk on condescension. I reject your views without a second thought.
-----------
This is hardly news, tho you made a passable effort to humor me in the past.
---------
When you champion the elimination of freedom via false dichotomy,
-----------
I am the guy knocking down false dichotomies. And I am the guy working for a freedom and trying to create a sky you still can;t even wake up to see.
----------
you declare yourself the enemy of human beings,
----------
Thats rich, considering that i'm the guy working to fix the problems and all you really have for solutions is an impossible pet paradigm you probably picked up from a death metal band.
----------
and rely only on the fallacy of ridicule to justify it.
--------
Bullshit. I came in to tribe being the sweetest nice guy this place had ever seen and quickly learned that wasn't what this place was about.
I sharpened my teeth over at tou watchdog and then i changed up my tactics. I have a steep learning curve. Nobody regrets the fact that this is a battle more than i do. But that doesn't make me dumb enough to accept defeat on principle.
-----------
You are the worst kind of dupe -
------------
You are going to wake up any moment now and realize that you know better.
-----------
self-satisfied,
-----------
define that for me, would you? It lacks sting in that it means virtually nothing.
---------
conceited,
---------
I have pure self knowledge. You can call that conceit, but i'm the one who can dissolve my ego and you are just another muggle trapped inside the stage of the proximal stimulus.
----------
distracted by narcissism,
------------
Again, i'm an aspie. My brain doesn't do narcisism, those neurons and the mirror neurons do mental simulation instead.
----------
freely lauding history's antagonists - apparently in the belief that you'll benefit somehow from the suppression of ethical governance.
----------
Ethical governance is a great idea. So lets talk about ethics. Pretending that anarchism is ethical is a bit silly when anarchy would cause people to abandon ethics and morality in favor of guns and mob violence.
------------
Shame on you, prometheus.
------------
No loki, and i won't even mirror it back at you, because i don't really see any shame in your position, just attachment to a wrong paradigm.
-
-
Re: Together, apart - You Simply Fail, by Choice
Sun, October 19, 2008 - 7:37 AMbump
-
-
-
