Advertisement

batman's bain

topic posted Wed, July 18, 2012 - 8:22 AM by  Gerbil
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2...campaign
RUSH: Have you heard this new movie, the Batman movie, what is it, The Dark Knight Lights Up or whatever the name is. That's right, Dark Knight Rises. Lights Up, same thing. Do you know the name of the villain in this movie? Bane. The villain in The Dark Knight Rises is named Bane, B-a-n-e. What is the name of the venture capital firm that Romney ran and around which there's now this make-believe controversy? Bain. The movie has been in the works for a long time. The release date's been known, summer 2012 for a long time. Do you think that it is accidental that the name of the really vicious fire breathing four eyed whatever it is villain in this movie is named Bane?
posted by:
Gerbil
Chicago
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: batman's bain

    Wed, July 18, 2012 - 5:50 PM
    Limbaugh is only an entertainer -- just like Oliver Stone...
    • This post was deleted by Gerbil
    • Re: batman's bain

      Wed, July 18, 2012 - 7:17 PM
      Ya, people get all worked up about Limbaugh and other radio hosts like O'Reilly, but they're just entertainers who are playing to the fact that what they say gets people all riled up.
      • Re: batman's bain

        Fri, July 20, 2012 - 6:51 AM
        www.esquire.com/blogs/poli...ne-10785943

        when you reach more than 15+ million listeners a week and are seen as a major leader of the conservative movement, you become more than just an entertainer. cedric is an entertainer. rush is much more than that.
        • Re: batman's bain

          Fri, July 20, 2012 - 5:13 PM
          "when you reach more than 15+ million listeners a week and are seen as a major leader of the conservative movement, you become more than just an entertainer. cedric is an entertainer. rush is much more than that."

          Rush is no roll model or tries to be just like any other entertainer, that's the ugly side of showbiz. Remember "Radio america"? a few years ago? They were that new AM radio station that tried to be the liberal answer to Rush and O'Reilly - they tried to be straight shooters and weren't controversial and as a result not enough people talked or listened to them and they went out of business. NPR would probably be out of business too if they were a for profit business.
          • This post was deleted by Gerbil
          • Re: batman's bain

            Sat, July 21, 2012 - 1:07 PM
            <Rush is no roll model>

            irrelevant. the fact is that he has millions of listeners who LISTEN to what he says as TRUTH. who gives a shit if he's a role model or not. he's a voice that influences MILLIONS of americans.
            • Re: batman's bain

              Mon, July 23, 2012 - 6:53 PM
              I'd like to cut the Government spending that pays to broadcast his "show" worldwide across Armed Services Radio. Does this not inflate drastically his actual viewership? What would the REAL numbers be of his regular audience if not for the Government fat?
  • Re: batman's bain

    Wed, July 18, 2012 - 10:30 PM
    <Do you think that it is accidental that the name of the really vicious fire breathing four eyed whatever it is villain in this movie is named Bane?>
    No.

    bane   [beyn]
    noun
    1. a person or thing that ruins or spoils:
    Gambling was the bane of his existence.
    2. a deadly poison (often used in combination, as in the names of poisonous plants):
    wolfsbane; henbane.
    3. death; destruction; ruin.
    4. Obsolete . that which causes death or destroys life:
    entrapped and drowned beneath the watery bane.
    dictionary.reference.com/browse/bane
  • Re: batman's bain

    Wed, August 1, 2012 - 2:17 AM
    Bane has been the name of a Batman villain long before Romney was widely known. If anything, the movie is a right wing attack on violent anarchists and Occupy types.
    • Re: batman's bain

      Wed, August 1, 2012 - 8:36 AM
      crookedtimber.org/2012/07/2...-ceremony/
      Dark Knight Rises and The Olympic Opening Ceremony
      by John Holbo on July 28, 2012

      Following up Henry’s post, my Dark Knight Rises take is this. The Nolan brothers are determined to make some kind of serious, dark, brooding, non-fascistic moral sense of Batman, and that’s just flat-out impossible. Can’t tell it that way without the basic story logic boxing you into a place you don’t want to be (as Henry says, there’s too much baked in the cake). If what the world needs is masked vigilantes behaving in this crazy way, then fascism needs a serious look-in as a political philosophy. But what we should really conclude is not that the moral sense of the film is fascist – or even aristocratic. Rather, we should conclude that the film makes no moral sense whatsoever. It conveys no moral message. It’s morally illegible. Lots of explosions and fighting. That’s it.

      You just can’t call a film fascist – or even aristocratic – when the makers are at such evident pains not to have that be the moral of the story. A related point: lots of complaints about swipes at the Occupy folks. But surely the Nolans are trying to be evenhanded, to an almost pathetic degree: you could say that the film makes a point of showing that it’s evil 1%-ers – the finance guys trying to take over Wayne Enterprises – who let Bane get control of Gotham. They think they are using him, for their dishonest stock market rigging shenanigans, but he’s using them. Bane brings out the worst in the 1% and the 99%. Not that this makes it the case that the movie has anything minimally sensible to say about 1%/99% relations – we all need to unite against nihilism!

      The whole thing makes no more moral sense than that 100-foot tall Voldemort I just saw fight with a bunch of Mary Poppinses. What did you think of that? I thought it was extremely bizarre and I didn’t like it. I enjoyed Dark Knight Rises a lot more. I enjoyed it a lot, actually. But it’s no Batman: The Brave and the Bold animated series. Superhero stories should only ever be about the fact that superhero stories make no sense – if they have to be about something. The Avengers wasn’t really about anything, for example. That was an appropriate message for a film like that.

Recent topics in "! * POLITICS * !"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Obama's penis is te problem ? C 0 May 21, 2013
How to ? C 4 May 17, 2013
Occupy Building 7 - November 19-20 Harmen 278 May 17, 2013
The Climate Wars... Harmen 164 May 14, 2013