Advertisement
biologically of his children, neither was Debbie Rowe the mother, according to this article. .
www.tmz.com/2009/06/30/m...ren-in-vitro/
www.tmz.com/2009/06/30/m...ren-in-vitro/
posted by:
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 9:46 AMNow I'm suddenly very thankful that I never donated sperm. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 9:57 AM<Now I'm suddenly very thankful that I never donated sperm. >
Or is that, thankful that they rejected you?
-
Unsu...
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 9:57 AMLol! Like it was a secret that Jackson wasn't the father of of those kids. Come on people is this really news? -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 10:04 AMTalk about self hate, I mean, I understand that sex with an adult women grossed him out, but he wouldn't even use his own sperm in vitro.
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:32 PM<<Lol! Like it was a secret that Jackson wasn't the father of of those kids. Come on people is this really news? >>
LOL! My thoughts exactly. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 1:34 PMI don't know jack about celebrities, its not usually my cup of tea. . .so it was a surprise to me. I am only getting interested in Michael Jackson now because this is a tale of Shakespearean dimensions. . -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 7:29 PMhow many men will suddenly claim that they donated the baby batter and want custody of the kids and a piece of the cake. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 8:18 PM<how many men will suddenly claim that they donated the baby batter and want custody of the kids and a piece of the cake. >
What cake? The man was living off credit, from what I understand.
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 7:56 PMyeah it really is a celebrity story that just keeps on giving.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 8:11 PMWell he DID sing that "the kid is not my son"... -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 8:20 PM<Well he DID sing that "the kid is not my son"... >
I thought it was "That chair is not my son" which made perfect sense at the time, after all who could father a chair? -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 8:56 PMJohn: What cake? The man was living off credit, from what I understand.
now that he is dead and (i asume) all recent sales ,which went through the roof ,and royalties will go to the kids.......and i doubt they will make the kids pay up MJ's dept. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 8:58 PM"and i doubt they will make the kids pay up MJ's dept. "
Yes, banks and creditors are known to be such understanding and caring entities -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 9:14 PM<"and i doubt they will make the kids pay up MJ's dept. "
Yes, banks and creditors are known to be such understanding and caring entities >
When you owe a few hundred or even few thousand, maybe, but when you owe millions?, you can bet the bank is the only one with a claim on any royalties, those poor little butt fucked kids are SOL! -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 9:36 PMI was being sarcastic -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 1:21 AMuh guys i'm pretty sure the world's most famous entertainer whose death has basically transfixed billions of people and caused a mad rush to buy his music will have a 400M debt wiped out pretty quick.
those kids will be rich as hell. his estate will out-earn elvis, bob marley, the beatles, etc. michael is THE most popular entertainer ever. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Fri, July 3, 2009 - 9:12 PM<uh guys i'm pretty sure the world's most famous entertainer whose death has basically transfixed billions of people and caused a mad rush to buy his music will have a 400M debt wiped out pretty quick.
those kids will be rich as hell. his estate will out-earn elvis, bob marley, the beatles, etc. michael is THE most popular entertainer ever. >
How the hell is he going to do that being dead? Elvis, Bob Marley and the beatles made music that changed that world, what did Michaels music do besides bring masturbation and pedophilia to a national discussion? There is no Michael Jackson estate, the creditors will divide that shit up and the kids will be sold the highest bidding pedophiles.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 10:20 PMHer being a surrogate sure makes a lot of sense. She certainly hasn't acted like a mother. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 8:39 PMJohn and Spig....
you guys forgot that for each released 12 song album/cd...there were twice or three times as many songs... recorded, which never were put on vinil, cd......or ever heard by the public.
who ever owns the right to these recordings could release a new album/cd every month for the next ...i guess.....a year.
can you say chaching. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 8:51 PMyeah its definitely going to produce a huge revenue stream.
also, once they turn neverland into a graceland type monument...its just going to be a money machine.
shit....i need to get in on it! where's jesse's business card when I need it...
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 9:33 PM<you guys forgot that for each released 12 song album/cd...there were twice or three times as many songs... recorded, which never were put on vinil, cd......or ever heard by the public. >
Not to mention the slew of alternate takes of all his hits that I imagine exist in Sony's vaults. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 11:22 PMMeanwhile, 12 of his fans have committed suicide! -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 11:46 PMNatural Selection: It works, bitches -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Thu, July 2, 2009 - 4:27 PMMaybe post-suicide was their natural default state and Michael Jackson was all that was keeping them from it. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Fri, July 3, 2009 - 9:14 PMI can't imagine anything sadder then having Michael Jackson as your sole reason for living. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 3:11 PMQuite.
In such cases, we might simply regard their 'suicides' a DIY euthanasia.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Fri, July 3, 2009 - 11:46 PM -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 5:23 PM>Do these look like Jackson's kids?<
Maybe white Michael Jackson's kids. Certainly not black Michael Jackson's. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Sat, July 4, 2009 - 7:33 PM<Maybe white Michael Jackson's kids. Certainly not black Michael Jackson's.>
Maybe he bleached his genes?
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 12:39 AMIs plastic surgery genetic?
Maybe Lamarck was right after all
-
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 12:40 AMJackson for a long time wouldn't let his kids go out without wearing masks. Though it could have been an effort to protect their anonymity, it could also have been an effort to keep people from noticing how much they didn't look like him. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 7:35 PMI am looking forward to " I used to be Michael Jacksons Blanket" a tell all by his children 20 years from now. Now that will bring some money to their estate. -
-
Re: Michael Jackson, not the father. .
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 9:31 PMmaybe they'll have a trio, the jackson 3 and sing "who's your daddy?"
-
-
-
