Advertisement
the 1994 world trade center bombing was professionally investigated and the perpetrators indicted, tried and convicted in absentia.
why not bin laden?
why not bin laden?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 4:25 PMYou mean in absentia? -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 5:05 PM<Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
You mean in absentia? >
to my sensibilities there is an UTTER lack of ambiguity in my post regarding your question. i see no possible way my post can be construed to mean other than in absentia. and as far as i know, osama IS still at large.
if there is such valid reasoning, i would be fascinated to hear it.
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 7:38 PMit's interesting to note that the FBI website does *not* list Bin Laden as responsible for 9-11
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 9:44 PMSimple question zoner. Quite obviously your emotions are more and more deteriorating what few rational faculties remaining that haven't been overwhelmed by your ideological agenda. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 9:56 PMThanks for the input, Ronqaeda. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 10:16 PMSean is in meltdown after he was outed for lying
-
-
-
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 10:01 PMwhy would they prosecute an intelligence asset?
didnt they learn that mistake with Possada?
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 10:29 PMBecause he took the credit, but the more I read the more I realize, it wasn't really the bin Laden's people that truly made the towers go down!
Who had the most to gain from the US turning the world against Arabs and Muslims? If you said "Israel" bingo!! Their enemy is now our enemy!
uspolitics.tribe.net/thread/...b9f942a2
Plus more links:
www.prisonplanet.com/article...rael.htm
infowars.com/articles/se..._mystery.htm
www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd162.htm
www.etherzone.com/2002/raim031502.shtml
www.likud.nl/extr214.html
www.amazon.com/tag/politics/forum
www.prisonplanet.com/massive..._11.html
newguards.us/brent/Isral...Attacks.html
www.churchoftrueisrael.com/nsfo....html
www.projectcensored.org/newsfl...11.html
nworeport.blogspot.com/2007/0...11.html
www.giwersworld.org/911/is-spies.phtml
www.commondreams.org/headlin...2-05.htm
mail.psychedelic-library.org/pip...html
pcapostate.blogspot.com/2007/0...is.html
www.antiwar.com/justin/j100402.html
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...hive.cgi
www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn-...cts.html
www.informationclearinghouse.info/a...tm
www.infowars.net/articles/...06Haas.htm
www.rense.com/general64/moss.htm
www.youtube.com/watch
www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp
www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp
www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn
www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 4:44 AMThank you for all of those links, Liver. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 5:17 AMI find this statement by the FBI most telling..
"He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”"
FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”
Global Research, June 10, 2006
Muckracker Report
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??Not enough evidence for an indictment but enough to start an entire war??
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 12:25 PMYour welcome, Stickboy.
Why are we still sending welfare to a country that has twice attacked and cost us American lives. First Israel attacked one our ships in 1967 pretending that they thought we were Russians, to get us involved in their war.
And now with 9-11; the only way they could have had pre-knowledge to have the cameras ready was if they were part of the planning and execution. Driving white vans, dressed as arabs, and carrying explosives is more than mere suspection! One doesn't drive around with explosives unless they are planning on blowing up something up and they don't dress like arabs unless they are trying to make it look like arabs did it.
Which is exactly what Americans think happened!
The families of the 9-11 victims are suing the wrong people! they should be suing Israel!
When are we going to stop letting Israel control our country? -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 1:52 PM"The families of the 9-11 victims are suing the wrong people! they should be suing Israel! "
hmmmm, Bin Laden seems to agree with you, this excerpt is from one of the few interviews with Usama Bin Laden after 911 that is certainly real..
UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?
Usama bin Laden:
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.
The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American-Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.
Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
www.serendipity.li/wot/obl_int.htm -
-
Unsu...
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 1:57 PMNo one, not Bush, Clinton anyone wants to catch Bin Laden, the worst thing that could happen is
for us to kill or capture him.
Sounds funny right? wrong. If we killed him he becomes a martyr, also a they'll need a new head of EK, or worse splinter
it completely. The unknown is worse that what we know...
No as long as we have him hiding in the hills he can do us no harm. The day we kill him, he will birth an Army.
Art Brut
-
-
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 8:50 PM
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 10:51 PMExcellent question. Perhaps Ron can answer it.
Oh, wait. Ron is busy right now changing the subject. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 11:23 PMChanging the subject? The only think I've asked directly addressed the OP. Are you drunk? -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 5:37 AM<<Changing the subject? The only think I've asked directly addressed the OP. Are you drunk?>>
The only think? The OP? And you ask me if I'm drunk?
And yes, you tried to change the subject. DZ asked a question about why OB was never indicted. You responded by chiding DZ for a nonexistent typo. Then you accused him of losing his rationality to overwhelming ideology-driven emotions. Then you accused Sean of being a liar (about what I know not).
Are you mental? Are you taking speedballs? Do you need to clean your spectacles? -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:34 PM"You responded by chiding DZ for a nonexistent typo."
You need to stop snorting your hairspray. I never chided him for any typo. I asked him a straightforward question and he responded with a snippy remark. Get back to me when the high wears off.
-
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 4:29 AM**********Oh, wait. Ron is busy right now changing the subject.***********
Subjects are like non radial tires they must be rotated. Look at what the leftists do to so many of my threads.
Pot - - - Kettle
You get the drill.
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 5:24 AM*******why not bin laden? ****************
I am guessing that it was because DOJ wanted the pomp and circumstance of a public trial with OBL on display for all to see.
I know I'd like that very much. So too just about everyone I know.
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 5:39 AM<<I am guessing that it was because DOJ wanted the pomp and circumstance of a public trial with OBL on display for all to see. >>
That's not rational Justice Dept policy. That's a circus for the masses -- which is what this depraved administration is all about. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 2:49 PMProbably because they ran out of money and time ferrying all of his relatives out of this country while air traffic was at a premium. They just couldn't wait for the discount flights.
They had to shortcut the investigation by 1/6 the value of Bill's penis, things are tight in America these days due to the freefall of the dollar and industry fleeing the country faster than you can say special Bin Laden Flights. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 3:23 PMYou really are fixated on Bill's penis -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 3:36 PMSometimes a metaphor comes up and you just have to grab hold of it and milk it for all it's worth. -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 3:38 PM<Sometimes a metaphor comes up and you just have to grab hold of it and milk it for all it's worth.>
lol.
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 4:09 PMIt's a powerful metaphor. Many people are intimidated by it.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 4:52 PMZoner, sorry I missed the word "absentia" in your OP. My question was therefore useless once I read your post correctly, but it was an innocent question -
-
Re: why was osama bin laden never indicted or tried for murder?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 2:20 PM<Zoner, sorry I missed the word "absentia" in your OP. My question was therefore useless once I read your post correctly, but it was an innocent question.>
acknowledged.
-